Patterns in the form of formative feedback and student response

References

• Bastian, M., S. Heymann, and M. Jacomy. 2009. “Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks.” In Proceeding of the Third International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, edited by Eytan Adar, Matthew Hurst, Tim Finin, Natalie Glance, Nicolas Nicolov and Belle Tseng, 361–362. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. 1998. “Formative Assessment: Raising Standards inside the Classroom.” School Science Review 80 (291): 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P. 2015. “Formative Assessment – An Optimistic but Incomplete Vision.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22 (1): 161–177. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. Wiliam. 2004. “Working Inside the Black Box: Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.” Phi Delta Kappan 86 (1): 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brousseau, G. 1997. Theory of Didactical Situations in Mathematics: Didactique Des Mathématiques, 1970–1990. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, J. 2012. ”Networks in Physics Education Research: A Theoretical, Methodological, and Didactical Explorative Study.” PhD diss., University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Bruun, J. 2016. “Networks as Integrated in Research Methodologies in pER.” In 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, edited by Dyan L. Jones, Lin Ding and Adrienne L. Traxler, 11–17. College Park: American Association of Physics Teachers. doi:10.1119/perc.2016.plenary.002.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., A. Trauth-Nare, and J. Kaftan. 2010. “Making Formative Assessment Discernable to Pre-Service Teachers of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 402–421. doi:10.1002/tea.20344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., P. Black, W. Harlen, and A. Tiberghien. 2018. “Exploring Relations between Summative and Formative Assessment.” In Transforming Assessment: Through Interplay between Practice, Research and Policy, edited by Jens Dolin and Robert Evans. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol. 4. 53–80. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_3.
   Google Scholar
• Dolin, J., J. Bruun, S. S. Nielsen, S. B. Jensen, and P. Niemenen. 2018. “The Structured Assessment Dialogue.” In Transforming Assessment: Through Interplay between Practice, Research and Policy, edited by Jens Dolin and Robert Evans. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol. 4. 109–140. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe, O. 1996. “The Multivoiced Classroom: Interactions of Writing and Classroom Discourse.” Written Communication 13 (3): 385–425. doi:10.1177/0741088396013003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmeskov, D. C., J. Bruun, and J. A. Nielsen. 2015. “Evaluering af bioteknologi A som forsøgsfag i stx og htx.” [Evaluation of Biotechnology A as Trial-Subject in the Gymnasium and the Higher Technical Examination Programme.] MONA Forskningsrapportserie Nr. 1. Copenhagen: Department of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2013. Assessment & Inquiry-Based Science Education: Issues in Policy and Practice. Trieste: Global Network of Science Academies (IAP) Science Education Programme (SEP).
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (2): 269–274. doi:10.1080/13562510120045230.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. 2005. “Efficient, High-Quality Force-Directed Graph Drawing.” The Mathematica Journal 10 (1): 37–71.
   Google Scholar
• Maslov, S., K. Sneppen, and A. Zaliznyak. 2004. “Detection of Topological Patterns in Complex Networks: Correlation Profile of the Internet.” Physica a: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications 333: 529–540. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2003.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, R. 2001. “Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 8 (4): 297–308. doi:10.1207/S15327884MCA0804_03.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. Merry, and K. Reiling. 2005. “Biology Students’ Utilization of Tutors’ Formative Feedback: A Qualitative Interview Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1080/02602930500099177.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., D. B. Young, C. C. Ayala, Paul R. Brandon, E. M. Furtak, M. A. Ruiz-Primo, M. K. Tomita, and Y. Yin. 2008. “On the Impact of Curriculum-Embedded Formative Assessment on Learning: A Collaboration between Curriculum and Assessment Developers.” Applied Measurement in Education 21 (4): 295–314. doi:10.1080/08957340802347647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shute, V. 2008. “Focus on Formative Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 78 (1): 153–189. doi:10.3102/0034654307313795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2011. “What is Assessment for Learning?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 37 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Windsløw, C. 2006. Didaktiske elementer [Didactical elements]. Frederiksberg: Biofolia.
   Google Scholar