Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments

References

• Alvarez, I., A. Espasa, and T. Guasch. 2012. “The Value of Feedback in Improving Collaborative Writing Assignments in an Online Learning Environment.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 387–400.10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashenafi, M. M. 2017. “Peer-Assessment in Higher Education – Twenty-first Century Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 226–251.10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton, S., and R. Davies. 2015. “Using Scaffolded Rubrics to Improve Peer Assessment in a MOOC Writing Course.” Distance Education 36 (3): 312–334.10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azarnoosh, M. 2013. “Peer Assessment in an EFL Context: Attitudes and Friendship Bias.” Language Testing in Asia 3 (11). Accessed http://languagetestingasia.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/2229-0443-3-11
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., and Y. J. Dori. 2005. “Enhancing Undergraduate Students’ Chemistry Understanding through Project-based Learning in an IT Environment.” Science Education 89 (1): 117–139.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., and S. Rafaeli. 2004. “Online Question-posing and Peer-assessment as Means for Web-Based Knowledge Sharing.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61 (1): 84–103.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., and A. Watted. 2017. “Project-based MOOC for Enhancing Scientists and Engineers Knowledge Construction and Motivation.” In Digital Tools and Solutions for Inquiry-Based STEM Learning, edited by I. Levin and D. Tsybulsky, 282–307. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/AETID
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., J. Harward, G. Kocur, and S. Lerman. 2007. “Transforming an Introductory Programming Course: From Lectures to Active Learning via Wireless Laptops.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (4): 325–336.10.1007/s10956-007-9055-5
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., A. Watted, and H. Haick. 2016. “Motivation to Learn in Massive Open Online Courses: Examining Aspects of Language and Social Engagement.” Computers & Education 94: 49–60.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., C. Harrison, C. Lee, B. Marshall, and D. William. 2003. Assessment for Learning: Putting It into Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and A. West. 2004. “Understanding the Rules of the Game: Making Peer Assessment as a Medium for Developing Students’ Conceptions of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 721–733.10.1080/0260293042000227254
   Google Scholar
• Breslow, L., D. E. Pritchard, J. DeBoer, G. S. Stump, A. D. Ho, and D. T. Seaton. 2013. “Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom: Research into edX’s First MOOC.” Research & Practice in Assessment 8 (1): 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, R. 1987. “Task-involving and Ego-involving Properties of Evaluation: Effects of Different Feedback Conditions on Motivational Perceptions, Interest, and Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 474–482.10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cederblom, D., and J. W. Lounsbury. 1980. “An Investigation of User Acceptance of Peer Evaluations.” Personnel Psychology 33 (3): 567–579.10.1111/peps.1980.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. H., and K. Cho. 2011. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.” Instructional Science 39 (5): 629–643.10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1968. “Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit.” Psychological Bulletin 70: 213–220.10.1037/h0026256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll, C., M. J. Rochera, and I. De Gispert. 2014. “Supporting Online Collaborative Learning in Small Groups: Teacher Feedback on Learning Content, Academic Task and Social Participation.” Computers & Education 75: 53–64.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2017. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347–360.10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley, S. J., and C. Bovill. 2017. “Staff Student Partnership in Assessment: Enhancing Assessment Literacy through Democratic Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 463–477.10.1080/02602938.2015.1126551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 1995. “Peer Feedback Marking: Developing Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education & Training International 32 (2): 175–187.10.1080/1355800950320212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education: A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Marks.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322.10.3102/00346543070003287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Toro, M., M. Truman, and M. Walker. 2013. “Are the Principles of Effective Feedback Transferable across Disciplines? A Comparative Study of Written Assignment Feedback in Languages and Technology.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 816–830.10.1080/02602938.2012.724381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formanek, M., M. C. Wenger, S. R. Buxner, C. D. Impey, and T. Sonam. 2017. “Insights about Large-scale Online Peer Assessment from an Analysis of an Astronomy MOOC.” Computers & Educations 113: 243–262.10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen, M., and B. D. De Wever. 2015. “Structuring Peer Assessment: Comparing the Impact of the Degree of Structure on Peer Feedback Content.” Computer in Human Behavior 52: 315–325.10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadim, H. A., and S. K. Esche. 2002. “Enhancing the Engineering Curriculum through Project-based Learning.” In Frontiers in Education, FIE 2002. 32nd Annual. Vol. 2, F3F–1. IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2002.1158200.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, J., and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students’ Views.” Higher Education Research and Development 20 (1): 53–70.10.1080/07294360123776
   Google Scholar
• Harland, T., N. Wald, and H. Randhawa. 2017. “Student Peer Review: Enhancing Formative Feedback with a Rebuttal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (5): 801–811.10.1080/02602938.2016.1194368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. 2011. “Peer Assessment in Large Undergraduate Classes: An Evaluation of a Procedure for Marking Laboratory Reports and a Review of Related Practices.” Advances in Physiology Education 35 (2): 178–187.10.1152/advan.00115.2010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and M. Gan. 2011. “Instruction Based on Feedback.” In Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, edited by P. Alexander and R. E. Mayer, 249–271. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaime, A., J. M. Blanco, C. Domı’nguez, A. Sa’nchez, J. Heras, and I. Usandiza. 2016. “Spiral and Project-based Learning with Peer Assessment in a Computer Science Project Management Course.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25: 439–449.10.1007/s10956-016-9604-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, S., T. Perkins, and S. Kennedy-Clark. 2016. “Using Self- and Peer-assessments for Summative Purposes: Analysing the Relative Validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) Model.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (6): 840–853.10.1080/02602938.2015.1039484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., K. McNeill, and B. Reiser. 2008. “Learning-goals-Driven Design Model: Developing Curriculum Materials that Align with National Standards and Incorporate Project-based Pedagogy.” Science Education 92 (1): 1–32.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, C., K. P. Wei, H. Le, D. Chia, K. Papadopoulos, J. Cheng, D. Koller, and S. Klemmer. 2013. “Peer and Self Assessment in Massive Online Classes.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20 (6): 1–31.10.1145/2562181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, C., R. Socher, M. Bernstein, and S. Klemmer. 2014. “Scaling Short-answer Grading by Combining Peer Assessment with Algorithmic Scoring.” Proceedings of ACM Learning at Scale, March, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., and F. Gao. 2016. “The Effect of Peer Assessment on Project Performance of Students at Different Learning Levels.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (6): 885–900.10.1080/02602938.2015.1048185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age: A Meta-analysis Comparing Peer and Teacher Ratings.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 245–264.10.1080/02602938.2014.999746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N. F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: the Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290.10.1080/13562510600680582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Pastor, V., and A. Sicilia-Camacho. 2017. “Formative and Shared Assessment in Higher Education. Lessons Learned and Challenges for the Future.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (1): 77–97.10.1080/02602938.2015.1083535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, R., and L. Bol. 2007. “A Comparison of Anonymous Versus Identifiable E-Peer Review on College Student Writing Performance and the Extent of Critical Feedback.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 (2): 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H., A. C. Robinson, and J. Y. Park. 2014. “Peer Grading in a MOOC: Reliability, Validity, and Perceived Effects.” Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 18 (2): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, S. E. M., L. Blakemore, and L. Marks. 2017. “Is Peer Review an Appropriate form of Assessment in a MOOC? Student Participation and Performance in Formative Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 1000–2013.10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miedijensky, S., and T. Tal. 2009. “Embedded Assessment in Project-based Science Courses for the Gifted: Insights to Inform Teaching all Students.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (18): 2411–2435.10.1080/09500690802389597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morahan-Martin, J. 1996. “Should Peers’ Evaluations be Used in Class Projects?: Questions regarding Reliability, Leniency, and Acceptance.” Psychological Report 78: 1243–1250.10.2466/pr0.1996.78.3c.1243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narciss, S. 2008. “Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. 3rd ed., edited by J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merriënboer and M. P. Driscoll, 125–143. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., and E. Good. 2006. “The Impact of Self- and Peer-grading on Student Learning.” Educational Assessment 11 (1): 1–31.10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1
   Google Scholar
• Snowball, J. D., and M. Mostert. 2013. “Dancing with the Devil: Formative Peer Assessment and Academic Performance.” Higher Education Research & Development 32 (4): 646–659.10.1080/07294360.2012.705262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Søndergaard, H., and R. A. Mulder. 2012. “Collaborative Learning through Formative Peer Review: Pedagogy, Programs and Potential.” Computer Science Education 22 (4): 343–367.10.1080/08993408.2012.728041
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. 1980. “The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry.” In Towards a Science of the Singular: Essays about Case Study in Educational Research and Evaluation, edited by H. Simons, 62–73. Norwich: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Strijbos, J. W., S. Narciss, and K. Dunnebier. 2010. “Peer Feedback Content and Sender’s Competence Level in Academic Writing Revision Tasks: Are they Critical for Feedback Perceptions and Efficiency?” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 291–303.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suñol, J. J., G. Arbat, J. Pujol, L. Feliu, R. M. Fraguell, and A. Planas-Lladó. 2016. “Peer and Self-assessment Applied to Oral Presentations from a Multidisciplinary Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 622–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2005. “Trends in Peer Learning.” Educational Psychology 25 (6): 631–645.10.1080/01443410500345172
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2013. “Peers as a Source of Formative and Summative Assessment.” In Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment, edited by J. H. McMillan, 395–412. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Voet, M., M. Gielen, R. Boelens, and B. De Wever. 2017. “Using Feedback Requests to Actively Involve Assessees in Peer Assessment: Effects on the Assessor’s Feedback Content and Assessee’s Agreement with Feedback.” European Journal of Psychology of Education: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M. 2015. “The Quality of Written Peer Feedback on Undergraduates’ Draft Answers to an Assignment, and the Use Made of the Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (2): 232–247.10.1080/02602938.2014.898737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wengrowicz, N., Y. J. Dori, and D. Dori. 2017. “Meta-assessment in a Project-based Systems Engineering Course.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 607–624.10.1080/02602938.2016.1173648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdinger, S., and M. Qureshi. 2015. “Enhancing College Students’ Life Skills through Project Based Learning.” Innovative Higher Education 40: 279–286.10.1007/s10755-014-9314-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar