Student satisfaction and online teaching

References

• Anderson, T. 2004. “Toward a Theory of Online Learning.”In Theory and Practice of Online Learning, edited by T. Anderson and F. Elloumi, 33–60. Athabasca, AB: Athabasca University.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J., and J. Pischke. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert, A. 2008. “The Development and Validation of the Student Evaluation of Online Teaching Effectiveness.” Computers in the Schools 25 (1–2): 25–47.10.1080/07380560802157717
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., and W. E. Cashin. 2012. “Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of Research and Literature.” IDEA Paper no. 50. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, S. L., R. Webster, A. Gross, and W. Pallett. 2010. “An Analysis of IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction in Traditional versus Online Courses.” IDEA Technical Report no. 15. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp, L. A., and J. C. Ory. 1994. Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A. 2009. Differences in Responses to the Student Instructional Report: Is it Bias?. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Centra, J. A., and N. B. Gaubatz. 2000. “Is There a Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?” The Journal of Higher Education 71 (1): 17–33.10.1080/00221546.2000.11780814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, K. A. 1993. “College Students’ Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part II-Evidence from Students’ Evaluations of Their Classroom Teachers.” Research in Higher Education 34 (2): 151–211.10.1007/BF00992161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaytan, J., and B. C. McEwen. 2007. “Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies.” American Journal of Distance Education 21 (3): 117–132.10.1080/08923640701341653
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C., K. Cagiltay, L. Byung-Ro, J. Craner, and T.M. Duffy. 2001, March/April. “Seven Principles of Effective Teaching: A Practical Lens for Evaluating Online Courses.” The Technology Source Archives, University of North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, D. P., and E. Lee. 2002a. “Basic Data for the Revised IDEA System.” IDEA Technical Report No. 12. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyt, D. P., and E. Lee. 2002b. “Disciplinary Differences in Student Ratings.” IDEA Technical Report No. 13. Manhattan, KS: The IDEA Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar: Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, F., and K. Xie. 2009. “Toward Deep Learning for Adult Students in Online Courses.” The Internet and Higher Education 12 (3–4): 136–145.10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K.-J., and C. J. Bonk. 2006. “The Future of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Survey Says.” Educause Quarterly 29 (4): 22–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmogorov, A. 1933.“Sulla Determinazioneempirica Di Unalegge Di Distribuzione.”Instituto Italiano degli Attuari, Giorni 4: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and J. Hattie. 2002. “The Relation between Research Productivity and Teaching Effectiveness.” Journal of Higher Education 73 (5): 603–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., and D. Hocevar. 1991. “Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: The Stability of Mean Ratings of the Same Teachers over a 13-Year Period.” Teaching and Teacher Education 7 (4): 303–314.10.1016/0742-051X(91)90001-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGhee, D. E., and N. Lowell. 2003. “Psychometric Properties of Student Ratings of Instruction in Online and on-Campus Courses.” In Online Student Ratings of Instruction: New Directions for Teaching and Learning, edited by T. D. Johnson and D. L. Sorenson, 39–48. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Nulty, D. 2007. “The Adequacy of Response Rates to Online and Paper Surveys: What Can Be Done?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (3): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palloff, R., and K. Pratt. 2007. Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, N. C. 2004. “Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism.” Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 7 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shevlin, M., P. Banyard, M. Davies, and M. Griffiths. 2000. “The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love Me, Love My Lectures?” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (4): 397–405.10.1080/713611436
   Google Scholar
• Smirnov, N. 1948. “Table for Estimating the Goodness of Fit of Empirical Distributions.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19 (2): 279–281.10.1214/aoms/1177730256
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. M., and G. R. Skanes. 1974. “Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching and the Characteristics of Successful Instructors.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66 (4): 584–590.10.1037/h0036929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. Y., and M. H. Newlin. 2000. “Characteristics of Students Who Enroll and Succeed in Psychology Web-Based Classes.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 137–143.10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48 (4): 817–838.10.2307/1912934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar