Using students’ feedback for teacher education: measurement invariance across pre-service teacher-rated and student-rated aspects of quality of teaching

References

• Caena, F. 2011. “Literature Review Quality in Teachers’ Continuing Professional Development.” Education and Training 2020:2–20.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. 2008. “What Happens if we Compare Chopsticks with Forks? the Impact of Making Inappropriate Comparisons in Cross-Cultural Research.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95 (5):1005–18. doi:10.1037/a0013193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., and R. B. Rensvold. 2002. “Evaluating Goodness of Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modelling 9 (2):233–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, C. 2012. Entwicklung von Professionalität in der Lehrerbildung. Empirische Befunde zu Eingangsbedingungen, Prozessmerkmalen und Ausbildungserfahrungen Lehramtsstudierender [Professional development in teacher education. Empirical evidence regarding entry conditions, process characteristics and educational experience of teacher education students]. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2000. “Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of State.” Education Policy Analysis Archives 8:1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and A. Lieberman. 2012. Teacher Education Around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., T. Bergen, and M. Brekelmans. 2006a. “Convergence and Divergence Between Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions of Instructional Behaviour in Dutch Secondary Education.” In Contemporary Approaches to Research on Learning Environments: World Views, edited by D. L. Fischer, and M. S. Khine, 125–60. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• den Brok, P., M. Brekelmans, and T. Wubbels. 2006b. “Multilevel Issues in Research Using Students’ Perceptions of Learning Environments: The Case of the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction.” Learning Environments Research 9 (3):199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ditton, H. 2002. “Lehrkräfte Und Unterricht Aus Schülersicht. Ergebnisse Einer Untersuchung im Fach Mathematik [Teachers and Instructions from the Students‘Perspective. Results from a Study in the Subject Mathematics.].” Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 48:262–86.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. J. 1998. “Science Learning Environments: Assessment, Effects and Determinants.” In The International Handbook of Science Education, edited by B. J. Fraser, and K. G. Tobin, 527–64. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. 1997. “Validity Concerns and Usefulness of Student Ratings of Instruction.” The American Psychologist 52 (11):1182–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greimel-Fuhrmann, B., and A. Geyer. 2003. “Students’ Evaluation of Teachers and Instructional Quality - Analysis of Relevant Factors Based on Empirical Evaluation Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (3):229–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hascher, T. 2012. “Lernfeld Praktikum – Evidenzbasierte Entwicklungen in Der Lehrer/Innenbildung [Learning Setting Student Teaching—Evidence Based Developments in Teacher Education].” Zeitschrift Für Bildungsforschung 2 (2):109–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hascher, T. 2014. “Forschung zur Wirksamkeit der Lehrerbildung [Research on the effectiveness of teacher education].” In Handbuch der Forschung zum Lehrerberuf [Research Handbook for the Teaching Profession]. 2. überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, edited by E. Terhart, H. Bennewitz, and M. Rothland, 542–71. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Hascher, T., J. Baillod, and S. Wehr. 2004. “Feedback from Pupils as a Source for the Learning Process during the Practical Training of Students of the Teaching Profession.” Zeitschrift Für Pädagogik 50:223–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2009. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, P., and B. Pflanzl. 2016. “Berufswahlmotive Und Pädagogisches Handeln in Schulpraktischen Studien [Motiviations for Becoming a Teacher and Instructional Quality in Teachers‘Practical Education.].” Erziehung Und Unterricht 5/6:489–97.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J., C. J. M. Maas, and M. J. S. Brinkhuis. 2010. “The Effect of Estimation Method and Sample Size in Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling.” Statistica Neerlandica 64 (2):157–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, J., and B. Pflanzl. 2016. “Is Teacher Knowledge Associated with Performance? on the Relationship between Teachers’ General Pedagogical Knowledge and Instructional Quality.” European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (4):419–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., and J. Baumert. 2006. “Who Is the Expert? Construct and Criteria Validity of Student and Teacher Ratings of Instruction.” Learning Environments Research 9 (3):231–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., U. Klusmann, J. Baumert, D. Richter, T. Voss, and A. Hachfeld. 2013. “Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development.” Journal of Educational Psychology 105 (3):805–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenske, G., and J. Mayr. 2015. “Das Linzer Konzept der Klassenführung (LKK). Grundlagen, Prinzipien und Umsetzung in der Lehrerbildung [The LKK. Basis, principles and application in teacher education].” In Jahrbuch für Allgemeine Didaktik 2015. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and B. D. Zumbo. 2009. “Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Subsequent Statistical Conclusions.” Psicológica 30: 343–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, O., U. Trautwein, I. Schnyder, and A. Niggli. 2007. “Simultane Analysen Auf Schüler- Und Klassenebene [Simultaneous Analyses at Student and Class Level: A Demonstration of Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Student Perceptions of Homework Assignment].” Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie 39 (1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., K.-T. Hau, and Z. Wen. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers in Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) Findings.” Structural Equation Modeling 11 (3):320–483. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. 2000. A New Era of School Reform: Going where the Research Takes Us. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, J. 2006. “Klassenführung Auf Der Sekundarstufe II: Strategien Und Muster Erfolgreichen Lehrerhandelns [Classroom Management in Secondary Education: strategies and Approaches of Successful Teachers].” Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Bildungswissenschaften 28:227–42.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, J. 2008. “Klassen Kompetent Führen. Ergebnisse Aus Der Forschung Und Anregungen Für Die Lehrerbildung [Managing Classes Effectively. Results of Research and Suggestions on Teacher Education].” Seminar 14:76–87.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, J., F. Eder, W. Fartacek, and G. Lenske. 2013. Linzer Diagnosebogen zur Klassenführung (LDK). Accessed March 29 2018. https://ldk.aau.at/pages/versionen.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, A. W., E. C. Johnson, and P. W. Braddy. 2008. “Power and Sensitivity of Alternative Fit Indices in Tests of Measurement Invariance.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 93:568–92. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2006.27182124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, W. 1993. “Measurement Invariance, Factor-Analysis and Factorial Invariance.” Psychometrika 58 (4):525–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millsap, R. E. 2011. Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., G. Haertel, B. H. Cheng, L. Ructtinger, A. DeBarger, E. Murray, D. Rose, J. Gravel, A. M. Colker, D. Rutstein, and T. Vendlinski 2013. “A “Conditional” Sense of Fairness in Assessment.” Educational Research and Evaluation 19 (2-3):121–40.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O. 1994. “Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research 22 (3):376–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B. O., and A. Satorra. 1995. “Complex Sample Data in Structural Equation Modeling.” Sociological Methodology 25:267–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998-2017. Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén
   Google Scholar
• Pflanzl, B., and G. Krammer. 2017. “Berufliche Interessen Von Lehrkräften an Berufsschulen [Vocational Interests of Vocational School Teachers].” R&E-SOURCE 8:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Pflanzl, B., G. Krammer, and P. Hecht. 2015. “Klassenführungsstrategien Angehender LehrerInnen [Instructional Quality of Aspiring Teachers.]” . Journal Für LehrerInnenbildung 15:48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pflanzl, B., A. Thomas, and M. Matischek-Jauk. 2013. “Pädagogisches Wissen Und Pädagogische Handlungskompetenz [Pedagogical Knowledge and Instructional Quality].” Erziehung & Unterricht 163:40–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pflanzl, B., A. Thomas, G. Krammer, and M. Matischek-Jauk. 2015. “Pädagogisches Handeln Von Berufsschullehrenden Als Determinante Für Das Verhalten Von Lehrlingen in Schulklassen [Instructional Quality of Vocational School Teachers as Determinant for the Behaviour of Their Students in Class].” Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, Sonderausgabe 2015:45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pianta, R. C. 2006. “Classroom Management and Relationships Between Children and Teachers: Implications for Research and Practice.” In Handbook of Classroom Management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, edited by C. M. Evertson, and C. S. Weinstein, 685–710. Malwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., G. A. Marcoulides, and C.-H. Li. 2012. “Measurement Invariance for Latent Constructs in Multiple Populations: A Critical View and Refocus.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 72 (6):954–74. doi:10.1177/0013164412441607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seethaler, E. 2017. “Lehrer-/Selbstwirksamkeit Und Klassenführung – Eine Längsschnittstudie. Sind Lehrer-/Selbstwirksame Lehramtsstudierende Erfolgreicher in Ihrem Pädagogischen Handeln?” Lehrerbildung Auf Dem Prüfstand 10:133–51.
   Google Scholar
• Seethaler, E. (in press). Befunde zur prädiktiven Validität eines Aufnahmeverfahrens für Lehramtsstudierende. Zeitschrift für empirische Hochschulforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., and R. J. Shavelson. 2007. “Teaching Effectiveness Research in the past Decade: The Role of Theory and Research Design in Disentangling Meta-Analysis Results.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4):454–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, R. J., and C. E. Lance. 2000. “A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 3 (1):4–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., R. Göllner, A. Helmke, U. Trautwein, and O. Lüdtke. 2013. “Construct Validity of Student Perceptions of Instructional Quality is High, but Not Perfect: Dimensionality and Generalizability of Domain-Independent Assessments.” Learning and Instruction 28:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M. C., G. D. Haertel, and H. J. Walberg. 1993. “Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning.” Review of Educational Research 63 (3):249–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widaman, K. F., and S. P. Reise. 1997. “Exploring the Measurement Invariance of Psychological Instruments: Applications in the Substance Use Domain.” In The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research. K. J. Bryant, M. Windle, and S. G. West, 281–324. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., and M. Brekelmans. 2005. “Two Decades of Research on Teacher-Student Relationships in Class.” International Journal of Educational Research 43 (1-2):6–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., M. Brekelmans, and H. P. Hooymayers. 1992. “Do Teacher Ideals Distort the Self-Reports of Their Interpersonal Behavior?.” Teaching and Teacher Education 8 (1):47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K.-H., and P. M. Bentler. 1998. “Robust Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 51 (1):63–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K., and S. Noffke. 2001. “Practitioner Research.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching. 4th ed., edited by V. Richardson, 298–330. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar