Curtailing marking variation and enhancing feedback in large scale undergraduate chemistry courses through reducing academic judgement: a case study

References

• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2):252–265. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2018. “Examining the Nature and Effects of Feedback Dialogue.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (7):1106–1119. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlett, J. E., J. W. Kotrlik, and C. C. Higgins. 2001. “Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research.” Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal 19 (1):43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., R. Mladenovic, and M. Price. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of the Usefulness of Marking Guides, Grade Descriptors and Annotated Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7):769–788. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.714738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. C. 1980. “Problems in Improving the Reliability of Essay Marks.” Assessment in Higher Education 5 (3):254–263. doi: 10.1080/0260293800050303.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, F. L., and R. Yucel. 2013. “Improving Marking Reliability of Scientific Writing with the Developing Understanding of Assessment for Learning Programme.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (5):536–553. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.658155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. 2009. “Marking and Moderation in the UK: false Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2):209–220. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., B. den-Outer, J. Hudson, and M. Price. 2016. “Let’s Stop the Pretence of Consistent Marking: Exploring the Multiple Limitations of Assessment Criteria.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3):466–481. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1024607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges, P., B. Bourdillon, D. Collymore, A. Cooper, W. Fox, C. Haines, D. Turner, H. Woolf, and M. Yorke. 1999. “Discipline‐Related Marking Behaviour Using Percentages: A Potential Cause of Inequity in Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (3):285–300. doi: 10.1080/0260293990240303.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, C. 1980. “Tutor Marked Assignments at the Open University: A Question of Reliability.” Assessment in Higher Education 5 (2):150–167. doi: 10.1080/0260293800050203.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. 2005. “Application of ICT and Rubrics to the Assessment Process Where Professional Judgement Is Involved: The Features of an e‐Marking Tool.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (5):529–537. doi: 10.1080/02602930500187055.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-Winning Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, M. 1986. “A Specific Investigation of Relative Performance of Examination Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 11 (2):130–137. doi: 10.1080/0260293860110204.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. 2007. “Is It Worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5):571–581. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116912.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. 1979. “A Study of the Reliability of Tutor Marked Assignments at the Open University.” Assessment in Higher Education 5 (1):16–44. doi: 10.1080/0260293790050102.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, C. O., P. E. Morris, and J. J. Richler. 2012. “Effect Size Estimates: Current Use, Calculations, and Interpretation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (1):2–18. doi: 10.1037/a0024338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George-Williams, S. R., A. L. Ziebell, R. R. A. Kitson, P. Coppo, C. D. Thompson, and T. L. Overton. 2018. “What Do You Think the Aims of Doing a Practical Chemistry Course Are? A Comparison of the Views of Students and Teaching Staff across Three Universities.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 19 (2):463–473. doi: 10.1039/C7RP00177K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. G. W., and N. D. Daglish. 1982. “Length and Quality: An Exploratory Study of Inter‐Marker Reliability.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 7 (2):186–191. doi: 10.1080/0260293820070209.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. 2008. Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, E., J. Milne, A. Ramsay, and D. Morrison. 2009. “Recommendations for the Use of e‐Tools for Improvements around Assignment Marking Quality.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (4):469–479. doi: 10.1080/02602930802071122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, K., and P. Docherty. 2011. “Reducing Variation in the Assessment of Student Writing.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1):109–124. doi: 10.1080/02602930903215842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal Filho, W., and P. Pace. 2016. Teaching education for sustainable development at university level. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., and A. Lenhard. 2016. Calculation of effect sizes. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, T., and J. Curran. 2010. “Are You Listening Please? The Advantages of Electronic Audio Feedback Compared to Written Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (7):759–769. doi: 10.1080/02602930902977772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E., and K. Coombe. 2006. “Quality and Qualms in the Marking of University Assignments by Sessional Staff: An Exploratory Study.” Higher Education 51 (1):45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopina, E., and R. McNeill. 2015. “Investigating the Relationship between Quality, Format and Delivery of Feedback for Written Assignments in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (5):666–680. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.945072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, S., C. Simpson, C. McKillop, and V. Nunn. 2002. “Electronic Course Surveys: Does Automating Feedback and Reporting Give Better Results?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (4):325–337. doi: 10.1080/0260293022000001346.
   Google Scholar