704
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Quantitative analysis of approaches to group marking

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abelson, M. A., and J. A. Babcock. 1986. “Peer Evaluation within Group Projects: A Suggested Mechanism and Process.” Organizational Behavior Teaching Review 10 (4): 98–100.
  • Barata, J., and M. Hussein. 2012. “The Moore–Penrose Pseudoinverse: A Tutorial Review of the Theory.” Brazilian Journal of Physics 42 (1–2): 146–165. doi: 10.1007/s13538-011-0052-z
  • Crosscombe, M., and J. Lawry. 2017. Exploiting Vagueness for Multi-Agent Consensus. In Multi-Agent and Complex Systems,67–78. Singapore: Springer.
  • Davies, W. M. 2009. “Groupwork as a Form of Assessment: Common Problems and Recommended Solutions.” Higher Education 58 (4): 563–584. doi: 10.1007/s10734-009-9216-y
  • Dijkstra, J., M. Latijnhouwers, A. Norbart, and R. A. Tio. 2016. “Assessing the I in Group Work Assessment: State of the Art and Recommendations for Practice.” Medical Teacher 38 (7): 675–682. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1170796.
  • Dyment, J. E., and T. S. O'Connell. 2011. “Assessing the Quality of Reflection in Student Journals: A Review of the Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 16 (1): 81–97. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507308
  • Fellenz, M. R. 2006. “Toward Fairness in Assessing Student Groupwork: A Protocol for Peer Evaluation of Individual Contributions.” Journal of Management Education 30 (4): 570–591. doi: 10.1177/1052562906286713
  • Freeman, M., and J. McKenzie. 2002. “SPARK, A Confidential Web-based Template for Self and Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Benefits of Evaluating Across Different Subjects.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5): 551–569. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00291.
  • Goldfinch, J. 1994. “Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 19 (1): 29–35. doi: 10.1080/0260293940190103.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16 (3): 235–266. doi: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
  • Jackel, B., J. Pearce, A. Radloff, and D. Edwards. 2017. “Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature for the Higher Education Academy. Higher Education Academy.
  • Ko, S. 2014. “Peer Assessment in Group Projects Accounting for Assessor Reliability by an Iterative Method.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (3): 301–314. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2013.860110.
  • Lejk, M., and M. Wyvill. 2001. “Peer Assessment of Contributions to a Group Project: A Comparison of Holistic and Category-Based Approaches.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 26 (1): 61–72. doi: 10.1080/02602930020022291.
  • Motegi, S., and N. Masuda. 2012. “A Network-Based Dynamical Ranking System for Competitive Sports.” Scientific Reports 2: 904. doi: 10.1038/srep00904
  • Page, L., S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd. 1999. The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Technical Report. Stanford InfoLab.
  • Park, J., and M. E. J. Newman. 2005. “A Network-Based Ranking System for US College Football.” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005 (10): P10014. doi: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/10/P10014.
  • Sharp, S. 2006. “Deriving Individual Student Marks from a Tutors Assessment of Group Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31 (3): 329–343. doi: 10.1080/02602930500352956.
  • Spatar, M., N. Penna, H. Mills, V. Kutija, and M. Cooke. 2015. “A Robust Approach for Mapping Group Marks to Individual Marks Using Peer Assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (3): 371–389. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.917270.
  • Suñol, J. J., G. Arbat, J. Pujol, L. Feliu, R. M. Fraguell, and A. Planas-Lladó. 2016. “Peer and Self-assessment Applied to Oral Presentations from A Multidisciplinary Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 622–637. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1037720.
  • Wu, C., E. Chanda, and J. Willison. 2014. “Implementation and Outcomes of Online Self and Peer Assessment on Group Based Honours Research Projects.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 21–37. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.779634.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.