You don’t always get what you pay for: User experiences of engaging with contract cheating sites

References

• Baird, M., and J. Clare. 2017. “Removing the Opportunity for Contract Cheating in Business Capstones: A Crime Prevention Case Study.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 13 (1):6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretag, T., R. Harper, M. Burton, C. Ellis, P. Newton, P. Rozenberg, S. Saddiqui, and K. van Haeringen. 2018. “Contract Cheating: a Survey of Australian University Students.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, G., and J. Clare. 2017. “How Prevalent Is Contract Cheating and to What Extent Are Students Repeat Offenders?” Journal of Academic Ethics 15 (2):115–24. doi:10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., and W. Sutherland-Smith. 2018a. “Can Markers Detect Contract Cheating? Results from a Pilot Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2):286–93. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1336746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., and W. Sutherland-Smith. 2018b. “Can Training Improve Marker Accuracy at Detecting Contract Cheating?: a Multi-disciplinary Pre-post Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, E., and C. Koutra. 2013. “Evaluation of the Persuasive Features of Hotel Chains Websites: A Latent Class Segmentation Analysis.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 34:338–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union 2018. Data Protection in the EU. Accessed 23 December 2018 https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/data-protection-eu_en
   Google Scholar
• Harper, R., T. Bretag, C. Ellis, P. Newton, P. Rozenberg, S. Saddiqui, and K. van Haeringen. 2018. “Contract Cheating: A Survey of Australian University Staff.” Studies in Higher Education :1. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1462789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., and D. R. Fesenmaier. 2008. “Persuasive Design of Destination Web Sites: An Analysis of First Impression.” Journal of Travel Research 47 (1):3–13. doi:10.1177/0047287507312405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, T., and R. Clarke. 2007. ‘The phenomena of contract cheating.’ In Student plagiarism in an online world: Problems and solutions. London: Idea Group Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Loussikian, K. 2015. ‘An international investigation shows the difficulty of monitoring and stopping academic ghostwriting.’ Inside Higher Education. Accessed 23 February 2018. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/18/international-network-shows-difficulty-detecting-student-ghostwriting
   Google Scholar
• Malesky, L., J. Baley, and R. Crow. 2016. “Academic Dishonesty: Assessing the Threat of Cheating Companies to Online Education.” College Teaching 64 (4):178–83. doi:10.1080/87567555.2015.1133558.
   Google Scholar
• Medway, D., S. Roper, and L. Gillooly. 2018. “Contract Cheating in UK Higher Education: A Covert Investigation of Essay Mills.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (3):393–418. doi:10.1002/berj.3335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency 2016. Plagiarism in Higher Education: Custom essay writing services an exploration of the next steps for UK Higher Education. Accessed 1 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency 2017. Contracting to cheat in Higher Education: How to address contract cheating, the use of third parties and essay mills. Accessed I January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Quality Assurance Agency (QAA) 2018. QAA Viewpoint: Tackling academic misconduct in higher education. Accessed 2 September 2018. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/about-us/what-we-do/policy-and-research/qaa-viewpoint
   Google Scholar
• Rogerson, A. 2017. “Detecting Contract Cheating in Essay and Report Submissions: Process, patterns, clues and Conversations.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 13 (1):10.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, S., C. Slade, K.-S. Wong, and B. Whiting. 2018. “Just Turn to Us’: the Persuasive Features of Contract Cheating Websites.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (4):652–65. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1391948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivasubramaniam, S.,. K. Kostelidou, and S. Ramachandran. 2016. “A Close Encounter with Ghost-writers: An Initial Exploration Study on Background.” Strategies and Attitudes of Independent Essay Providers.’ International Journal of Educational Integrity 12 (1). doi:10.1007/s40979-016-0007-9.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. 2015. “Students at Sydney University Use Impersonators to Sit Their Exams.” The Sydney Morning Herald 11 August 2015. Accessed October 13, 2016. http://www.smh.com.au
   Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency 2016. Report on student academic integrity and allegations of contract cheating by university students. Canberra: TEQSA. Accessed 31 August 2018. http://www.teqsa.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency 2017. Good Practice Note: Addressing contract cheating to safeguard academic integrity. Accessed 16 September 2018 http://www.teqsa.gov.au
   Google Scholar
• Tomar, D. 2012. The shadow scholar: How I made a living helping college kids cheat. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Visentin, L. 2015. “MyMaster Essay Cheating Scandal: More than 70 University Students Face Suspension.” Sydney Morning Herald 19 March, 2015. Accessed 13 February 2017. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/mymaster-essay-cheating-scandal-more-than-70-university-students-face-suspension-20150312-1425oe.html
   Google Scholar
• Walker, M., and C. Townley. 2012. “Contract Cheating: A New Challenge for Academic Honesty?” Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (1):27–44. doi:10.1007/s10805-012-9150y.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, M., and P. Newton. 2014. “Turnaround Time and Market Capacity in Contract Cheating.” Educational Studies 40 (2):233–6. doi:10.1080/03055698.2014.889597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolverton, B. 2016. “The New Cheating Economy.” The Chronicle of Higher Education 47 (43):26–8.
   Google Scholar