The challenges of feedback in higher education

References

• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2):252–265. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, N., L. Ahmed, and S. Rose. 2018. “Identifying Predictors of Students’ Perception of and Engagement with Assessment Feedback.” Active Learning in Higher Education 19 (3): 239–251. doi: 10.1177/1469787417735609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Government Department of Education and Training 2018. 2017 full year higher education statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., P. Dawson, D. Boud, S. Bennett, M. Hall, and E. Molloy. 2016. “Support for Assessment Practice: Developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (5):545–556. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6):698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. 1977. “Toward an Experimental Ecology of Human Development.” American Psychologist 32 (7):513–531. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.32.7.513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. Trust and its role in facilitating dialogic feedback. In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8):1315–1325. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4):395–407. doi: 10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. 2014. Graduate Course Experince 2013: A Report on the Course Experience Perceptions of Recent Graduates. Melbourne: Graduate Careers Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, N., A. B.Watson, M. A. Bakerson, E. E. Williams, F. X. McGoron, and B. Spitzer. 2012. “Electronic Feedback or Handwritten Feedback: What Do Undergraduate Students Prefer and Why?” Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology 1 (1):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. 2007. “Is It Worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5):571–581. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116912.
   Google Scholar
• Crook, C.,. H. Gross, and R. Dymott. 2006. “Assessment Relationships in Higher Education: The Tension of Process and Practice.” British Educational Research Journal 32 (1):95–114. doi: 10.1080/01411920500402037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossman, J. 2007. “The Role of Relationships and Emotions in Student Perceptions of Learning and Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (3):313–327. doi: 10.1080/07294360701494328.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., M. Henderson, P. Mahoney, M. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. 2019. “What Makes for Effective Feedback: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1):25–36. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2018.1467877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepwell, F., and G. Benfield. 2012. Evaluating assessment practices: The academic staff perspective. In Improving Student Engagement and Development through Assessment: Theory and Practice in Higher Education., eds Clouder, L, Brougham, C, Jewell, S and Steventon, G, 59–72. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. 2007. “Feed-Forward’: Improving Students' Use of Tutors' Comments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (3):271. doi: 10.1080/02602930600896498.
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 1995. Improving feedback to and from students. In Assessment for Learning in Higher Education., ed. Knight, P. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G., and C. Simpson. 2004. “Conditions under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning.” Learning and Teaching in Higher Education 1 (1):3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, C., and E. Brown. 2006. “Written Feedback for Students: Too Much, Too Detailed or Too Incomprehensible to Be Effective?” Bioscience Education 7 (1):1–16. doi: 10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., and K. Chesworth. 2000. “Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Research on Essay Writing: No One Way.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 24 (1):15–24. doi: 10.1080/030987700112282.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1):81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., and M. Phillips. 2015. “Video-Based Feedback on Student Assessment: Scarily Personal.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (1):51–66. doi: 10.14742/ajet.187810.14742/ajet.1878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higher Education Funding Council for England 2014. UK Review of the Provision of Information about Higher Education: National Student Survey Results and Trends Analysis 2005-2013. Bristol, UK: HEFCE.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D., V. Mccune, J. Hounsell, and J. Litjens. 2008. “The Quality of Guidance and Feedback to Students.” Higher Education Research & Development 27 (1):55–67. doi: 10.1080/07294360701658765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, M. 2007. “Fast and Effective Feedback: Are Model Answers the Answer?.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (6):601–611. doi: 10.1080/02602930601116946.
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. “Teaching Mixed Methods Research: Using a Socio-Ecological Framework as a Pedagogical Approach for Addressing the Complexity of the Field.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21 (4):409–424. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1427604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladonna, K. A., T. Taylor, and L. Lingard. 2018. “Why Open-Ended Survey Questions Are Unlikely to Support Rigorous Qualitative Insights.” Academic Medicine 93 (3):347–349. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, P., S. Macfarlane, and R. Ajjawi. 2019. “A Qualitative Synthesis of Video Feedback in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 24 (2):157-179. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., F. Borrell-Carrio, and R. Epstein. 2013. The impact of emotions in feedback. In Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well. eds Boud, D and Molloy, E, 50–71. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. 2009. “Assessment for Learner Self‐Regulation: enhancing Achievement in the First Year Using Learning Technologies.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (3):335–352. doi: 10.1080/02602930802255139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1):102–122. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 2011. “Feedback Alignment: Effective and Ineffective Links between Tutors’ and Students’ Understanding of Coursework Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2):125–136. doi: 10.1080/02602930903201651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, A., J. Jovanovic, S. Dawson, D. Gašević, and N. Mirriahi. 2017. “Using Learning Analytics to Scale the Provision of Personalised Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (1): 128–138. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, M., M. Henderson, and T. Ryan. 2016. Multimodal feedback is not always clearer, more useful or satisfying. In ASCILITE Conference 2016, eds Baker, S, Dawson, S, Pardo, A and Colvin, C, 514–522. Adelaide. http://2016conference.ascilite.org/wp-content/uploads/ascilite2016_phillips_full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Price, M., J. Carroll, B. O’Donovan, and C. Rust. 2011. “If I Was Going There I Wouldn’t Start from Here: A Critical Commentary on Current Assessment Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (4):479–492. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, A. D., J. Fitness, and L. N. Wood. 2014. “The Role and Functionality of Emotions in Feedback at University: A Qualitative Study.” The Australian Educational Researcher 41 (3):283–309. doi: 10.1007/s13384-013-0135-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C. 2007. “Towards a Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (2):229–237. doi: 10.1080/02602930600805192.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., and M. Henderson. 2018. “Feeling Feedback: Students Emotional Responses to Educator Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6):880–892. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2017.1416456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2017. Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. “It'd Be Useful, but i Wouldn't Use It': Barriers to University Students' Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11):2026–2041. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., and K. A. Frank. 2003. “Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective.” American Educational Research Journal 40 40 (4):807. doi: 10.3102/00028312040004807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar