Advancing text-analysis to tap into the student voice: a proof-of-concept study

References

• Bird, S., E. Klein, and E. Loper. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1): 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2009. “From Traditional Accountability to Shared Responsibility: The Benefits and Challenges of Student Consultants Gathering Midcourse Feedback in College Classrooms.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34(2): 231–241. doi:10.1080/02602930801956042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgort, I., K. Lundqvist, J. McDonald, and A. C. M. Moskal. 2018. “Analysis of Student Discussion Posts in a MOOC: Proof of Concept.” In Companion Proceedings 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK18).
   Google Scholar
• Grebennikov, L., and M. Shah. 2013. “Student Voice: Using Qualitative Feedback from Students to Enhance Their University Experience.” Teaching in Higher Education 18(6): 606–618. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.774353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honnibal, M. 2017. “Spacy.” Accessed 29 May 2019. https://spacy.io/
   Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., and H. Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., and A. C. M. Moskal. 2017. “Quantext: Analysing Student Responses to Short-Answer Questions.” In Me, Us, IT! Proceedings ASCILITE2017: 34th International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education, edited by H. Partridge, K. Davis, and J. Thomas, 133–137.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., A. C. M. Moskal, I. Elgort, and C. Gunn. 2018. “Analysing Student Responses: Early Lessons from a Pilot Study.” In Companion Proceedings 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK18).
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, T., R. Xiao, and Y. Tono. 2006. Corpus-Based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. 2012. “Interrater Reliability: The Kappa Statistic.” Biochemia Medica 22(3): 276–282. doi:10.11613/BM.2012.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskal, A. C. M., S. J. Stein, and C. Golding. 2016. “Can You Increase Teacher Engagement with Evaluation Simply by Improving the Evaluation System?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41(2): 286–300. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1007838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion., O. Grisel, M. Blondel, P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, and J. Vanderplas. 2011. “Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 12: 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam, E., B. Lynch, and J. Jones. 2018. “Making Sense of Student Feedback Using Text Analysis: Adapting and Expanding a Common Lexicon.” Quality Assurance in Education: An International Perspective 26(1): 60–69. doi:10.1108/QAE-11-2016-0062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., B. Brockx, and D. Mortelmans. 2013. “On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art.” Review of Educational Research 83(4): 598–642. doi:10.3102/0034654313496870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler, S. 2001. “An Overview of Content Analysis.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 17(7): 137–146. Available online: http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17
   Google Scholar
• Stupans, I., T. McGuren, and A. M. Babey. 2016. “Student Evaluation of Teaching: A Study Exploring Student Rating Instrument Free-Form Text Comments.” Innovative Higher Education 41(1): 33–42. doi:10.1007/s10755-015-9328-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winchester, T. M., and M. K. Winchester. 2014. “A Longitudinal Investigation of the Impact of Faculty Reflective Practices on Students' Evaluations of Teaching.” British Journal of Educational Technology 45(1): 112–124. doi:10.1111/bjet.12019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar