Voices at the gate: Faculty members’ and students’ differing perspectives on the purposes of the PhD comprehensive examination

References

• Anderson, W. P., C. J. Krauskopf, M. E. Rogers, and G. W. Neal. 1984. “Reasons for Comprehensive Examinations: A Re-evaluation.” Teaching of Psychology 11(2): 78–82. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1102_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., S. S. E. Bengsten, L. del Pilar Gallego Castaño, B. Crossouard, J. M. Keefer, and K. Pyhältö. 2015. “Drivers and Interpretations of Doctoral Education Today: National Comparisons.” Frontline Learning Research, 3(3): 5–22.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Universities & Colleges of Canada. 2008. Momentum: The 2008 Report on University Research and Knowledge Mobilization. Ottawa, Canada: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Association of Graduate Students. (2014). The Completion of Graduate Studies in Canadian Universities. Ottawa, Canada
   Google Scholar
  : Canadian Association for Graduates Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. 2013. “Balancing and Not-Knowing: An Exploration of Doctoral Candidates' Performance of Researcher Selves in the Dissertation Defence.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39(3): 364–379. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.834876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, G. 2007. “Deconstructing the Skills Training Debate in Doctoral Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 26(4): 377–391. doi:10.1080/07294360701658591.
   Google Scholar
• DiPietro, J. C., W. Drexler, K. Kennedy, V. Buraphadeja, F. Liu, and K. Dawson. 2010. “Using Wikis to Collaboratively Prepare for Qualifying Examinations: An Example of Implementation in an Advanced Graduate Program.” TechTrends 54(1): 25–32. doi:10.1007/s11528-009-0360-0.
   Google Scholar
• Estrem, H., and B. E. Lucas. 2003. “Embedded Traditions, Uneven Reform: The Place of the Comprehensive Exam in Composition and Rhetoric PhD Programs.” Rhetoric Review 22(4): 396–416. doi:10.1207/S15327981RR2204_4.
   Google Scholar
• Fansler, A. G., N. K. Roberts, and J. B. Hecht. 1995. “Using Computers to Write Comprehensive Examinations: A Study of Doctoral Level Examinations in Educational Administration Departments.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrmann, C. N., D. G. Halme, P. S. O'Sullivan, and B. Lindstaedt. 2011. “Improving Graduate Education to Support a Branching Career Pipeline: Recommendations Based on a Survey of Doctoral Students in the Basic Biomedical Sciences.” CBE-Life Sciences Education 10: 239–249. doi:10.1187/cbe.11-02-0013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furstenberg, A., and A. Nichols-Casebolt. 2001. “Hurdle or Building Block.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 21(1/2): 19–37. doi:10.1300/J067v21n01_03.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, R., J. Balatti, P. Turner, and H. Whitehouse. 2004. “The Generic Skills Debate in Research Higher Degrees.” Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3): 375–388. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235454.
   Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., and T. M. Dore. 2001. At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Doctoral Students Reveal About Doctoral Education (www.phd-survey.org). Philadelphia, PA: The Pew Charitable Trusts.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., N. Marshall, and L. Leonardo. 2012. “The Impact of Research Training and Research Codes of Practice on Submission of Doctoral Degrees: An Exploratory Cohort Study.” Higher Education Quarterly, 66(1): 47–64. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00499.x.
   Google Scholar
• Khanna, P. and J. L. Khanna. 1972. “Current Status of the Comprehensive Examination: A Survey.” American Psychologist: 761–765. doi:10.1037/h0033241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. 2011. “Government Policy and Research Higher Degree Education. “Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(6): 629–640. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2011.621189.
   Google Scholar
• Kostohryz, K. 2011. “The Comprehensive Examination in Counselor Education Doctoral Programs: A Study of Faculty's Perceived Purposes.” PhD diss., Ohio University.
   Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., and J. Norton. 2006. “Reframing Our Approach to Doctoral Programs: An Integrative Framework for Action and Research.” Higher Education Research and Development 25(1): 3–17. doi:10.1080/07294360500453012.
   Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H. and M. Roach. 2012. “Science PhD Career Preferences: Levels, Changes, and Advisor Encouragement. “PLoS ONE 7(5): e36307. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and G. A. Jones. (2007). “Shifting Roles and Approaches: Government Coordination of Post-secondary Education in Canada, 1995–2006.” Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1): 31–43. doi:10.1080/07294360601166794.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thiry, H., S. L. Laursen, and H. G. Loshbaugh. 2015. “‘How Do I Get From Here to There?’ An Examination of Ph.D Science Students’ Career Preparation and Decision Making. “International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 237–256. doi:10.28945/2280.
   Google Scholar
• Thyer, B. A. 2003. “A Student Portfolio Approach to Conducting Doctoral Social Work Comprehensive Examinations.” Journal of Teaching in Social Work 23(3/4): 117–126. doi:10.1300/J067v23n03_10.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. E., C. M. Golde, L. Jones, A. C. Bueschel, and P. Hutchings. 2008. The Formation of Scholars: Rethinking Doctoral Education for the Twenty-First Century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar