Biased grades? Changes in grading after a blinding of examinations reform

References

• Batruch, A. 2018. Reproduction of Social Class Inequalities at School: Experimental Study of Structural Barriers to Educational Equality. Lausanne: University of Lausanne.
   Google Scholar
• Behaghel, L., B. Crépon, and T. Le Barbanchon. 2015. “Unintended Effects of Anonymous Résumés.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 7(3):1–27. doi:10.1257/app.20140185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J., M. Fisek, R. Norman, and M. Zelditch. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J. 2011. “Sexism and Gender Inequality across 57 Societies.” Psychological Science 22(11):1413–1418. Volym doi:10.1177/0956797611420445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda, T., and S. T. Ly. 2012. Do Professors Really Perpetuate the Gender Gap in Science? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in a French Higher Education Institution., London: Centre for the Economics of Education. London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, D. J. 2008. “University Student Anonymity in the Summative Assessment of Written Work.” Higher Education Research & Development 27(1):43–54. doi:10.1080/07294360701658724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brylla, E. 2011. Scandinavian Surname Geography: East Scandinavia. In: R. Heuser, D. Nübling & M. Schmuck, eds. Familiennamengeographie: Ergebnisse Und Perspektiven Europäischer Forschung. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, S., and E. Greaves. 2013. “Test Scores, Subjective Assessment, and Stereotyping of Ethnic Minorities.” Journal of Labor Economics 31(3):535–576. Volume doi:10.1086/669340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceobanu, A. M., and X. Escandell. 2010. “Comparative Analyses of Public Attitudes toward Immigrants and Immigration Using Multinational Survey Data: A Review of Theories and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 36(1):309–328. Volume doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell, C.,. D. B. Mustard, and J. Van Parys. 2013. “Noncognitive Skills and the Gender Disparities in Test Scores and Teacher Assessments: Evidence from Primary School.” The Journal of Human Resources 48(1):236–264. Volume doi:10.1353/jhr.2013.0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. 2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review 69(1):93–113. doi:10.1177/000312240406900106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J, Benard, S. 2006. Biased Estimators? Comparing Status and Statistical Theories of Gender Discrimination. In: S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler, eds. Social Psychology of the Workplace, Vol 23, Advances in Group Processes. New York: Elsevier, pp. 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, W. A., et al. 2004. “Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces.” Psychological Science 15:806–816. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x.
   Google Scholar
• Feagin, J. R., and D. L. Eckberg. 1980. “Discrimination: Motivation, Action, Effects, and Context.” Annual Review of Sociology 6(1):1–20. Volume doi:10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59(3):237–254. doi:10.2307/2787021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorodzeisky, A., and M. Semyonov. 2016. “Not Only Competitive Threat but Also Racial Prejudice: Sources of anti-Immigrant Attitudes in European Societies.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 28(3):331–354. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., and M. J. Hiscox. 2007. “Educated Preferences: Explaining Attitudes toward Immigration in Europe.” International Organization 61(02):399–442. doi:10.1017/S0020818307070142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, R. N., and L. L. Linden. 2012. “Discrimination in Grading.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4(4):146–168. doi:10.1257/pol.4.4.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnerich, B. T., E. Höglin, and M. Johannesson. 2011. “Are Boys Discriminated in Swedish High Schools?” Economics of Education Review 30(4):682–690. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinnerich, B. T., E. Höglin, and M. Johannesson. 2015. “Discrimination against Students with Foreign Backgrounds: Evidence from Grading in Swedish Public High Schools.” Education Economics 23(6):660–676. Volume doi:10.1080/09645292.2014.899562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, D. P., and H. Higson. 2017. “A Large-Scale Examination of the Effectiveness of Anonymous Marking in Reducing Group Performance Differences in Higher Education Assessment.” PLoS ONE 12(8):e0182711. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0182711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., and P. Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, D. B., and C. Stern. 2005. “Professors and Their Politics: The Policy Views of Social Scientists.” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17(3-4):257–303. doi:10.1080/08913810508443640.
   Google Scholar
• Krawczyk, M. 2018. “Do Gender and Physical Attractiveness Affect Grades?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(1):151–161. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1307320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavy, V. 2008. “Do Gender Stereotypes Reduce Girls' or Boys' Human Capital Outcomes? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Public Economics 92(10-11):2083–2105. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, C., and R. Szulkin. 2002. “Permanent Disadvantage or Gradual Integration: Explaining the Immigrant–Native Earnings Gap in Sweden.” Labour 16(1):37–64. doi:10.1111/1467-9914.00186.
   Google Scholar
• Malouff, J. M., and E. B. Thorsteinsson. 2016. “Bias in Grading: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Findings.” Australian Journal of Education 60(3):245–256. doi:10.1177/0004944116664618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1973. [1942]. The Normative Structure of Science. In: The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pager, D., and H. Shepherd. 2008. “The Sociology of Discrimination: Racial Discrimination in Employment, Housing, Credit, and Consumer Markets.” Annual Review of Sociology 34(1):181–209. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., and N. Winstone. 2018. “The Impact of Anonymous Marking on Students' Perceptions of Fairness, Feedback and Relationships with Lecturers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(7):1183–1193. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1437594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., and L. Smith-Lovin. 1999. “The Gender System and Interaction.” Annual Review of Sociology 25(1):191–216. Volume doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. P., and S. T. Lubienski. 2011. “The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading during Elementary and Middle School.” American Educational Research Journal 48(2):268–302. Volume doi:10.3102/0002831210372249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprietsma, M. 2013. “Discrimination in Grading: Experimental Evidence from Primary School Teachers.” Empirical Economics 45(1):523–538. Volume doi:10.1007/s00181-012-0609-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C. 2003. Stereotype Threat and African-American Student Achievement. In: Young, Gifted and Black: Promoting High Achievement among African-American Students. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 109–177.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, D. G., and J. Berger. 1997. “Gender and Interpersonal Task Behaviors: Status Expectation Accounts.” Sociological Perspectives 40(1):1–32. doi:10.2307/1389491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ewijk, R. 2011. “Same Work, Lower Grade? Student Ethnicity and Teachers’ Subjective Assessments.” Economics of Education Review 30(5):1045–1058. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar