‘It has a purpose beyond justifying a mark’: examining the alignment between the purpose and practice of feedback

References

• Bharuthram, S., and S. McKenna. 2006. “A Writer-Respondent Intervention as a Means of Developing Academic Literacy.” Teaching in Higher Education 11(4):495–507. doi:10.1080/13562510600874300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38(6):698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E., and C. Glover. 2006. “Evaluating Written Feedback.” In Innovative Assessment in Higher Education, edited by C. Bryan and K. Clegg, 81–91. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E., C. Glover, S. Freake, and V. Stevens. 2004. “Evaluating the Effectiveness of Written Feedback as an Element of Formative Assessment in Science.” Paper presented at 12th Improving Student Learning Symposium, Birmingham, England, September 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D. 2009. “Strategies for Using Feedback Students Bring to Higher Education.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 34(1):41–50. doi:10.1080/02602930801895711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, D., and J. Pieterick. 2010. Giving Students Effective Written Feedback. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31(2):219–233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36(4):395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, N. L. 2009. “Unpacking a Signature Pedagogy in Literary Studies.” In Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind, edited by R.A.R. Gurung, N. L. Chick and A. Haynie, 36–55. Virginia: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2016. “Secondary School English Literary Studies: Cultivating a Knower Code.” In Knowledge Building: Educational Studies in Legitimation Code Theory, edited by K. Maton, S. Hood and S. Shay, 158–175. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cromwell, L. 2005. “Reading and Responding to Literature: Developing Critical Perspectives.” In Disciplines as Frameworks for Learning: Teaching the Practice of the Disciplines, edited by T. Riordan and J. Roth, 77–93. Virginia: Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Department of English Studies Student Handbook. 2016. English Department: Bellville, University of the Western Cape (unpublished).
   Google Scholar
• Dowden, T., S. Pittaway, H. Yost, and R. McCarthy. 2013. “Students’ Perceptions of Written Feedback in Teacher Education: Ideally Feedback Is a Continuing Two-Way Communication That Encourages Progress.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38(3):349–362. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.632676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, N. 2007. “Feed-Forward’: Improving Students’ Use of Tutors’ Comments.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 32(3):271–283. doi:10.1080/02602930600896498.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. 2011. “Student Perceptions of Quality Feedback in Teacher Education.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 36(1):51–62. doi:10.1080/02602930903197883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2012. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. 4th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gooder, R. D. 2005. “What English Was.” The Cambridge Quarterly 34(3):297–311. doi:10.1093/camqtly/bfi033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, D. J., and R. Osman. 2014. “Massification in Higher Education: Large Classes and Student Learning.” Higher Education 67(6):711–719. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9733-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R. 2000. “‘Be More Critical’: Rethinking Assessment Feedback.” Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference. Cardiff University, September 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, R., P. Hartley, and A. Skelton. 2001. “Getting the Message across: The Problem of Communicating Assessment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 6(2):269–274. doi:10.1080/13562510120045230.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. F. 2005. “Yes, a Very Good Point!’: A Critical Genre Analysis of a Corpus of Feedback Commentaries on Master of Education Assignments.” Teaching in Higher Education 10(3):339–353. doi:10.1080/13562510500122222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanič, R., R. Clark, and R. Rimmershaw. 2000. “What am I Supposed to Make of This? The Messages Conveyed to Students by Tutors’ Written Comments.” In Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts, edited by M. R. Lea and B. Stierer, 47–65. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kajee, L., and R. Balfour. 2011. “Students’ Access to Digital Literacy at a South African University: Privilege and Marginalisation.” South African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 92(3):185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, R., and B. Bangeni. 2005. “‘I Was Just Never Exposed to This Argument Thing’: Using a Genre Approach to Teach Academic Writing to ESL Students in the Humanities.” In Genre across the Curriculum, edited by A. Herrington, and C. Moran, 109–125. Utah: Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M. 2001. Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A., and K. Wilson. 2008. “Feedback on Assessment: Students’ Perceptions of Quality and Effectiveness.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 33(3):263–275. doi:10.1080/02602930701292548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckett, K., and A. Hunma. 2014. “Making Gazes Explicit: Facilitating Epistemic Access in the Humanities.” Higher Education 62(3):183–198. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9651-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. 2011. “Building a Knowledge Structure for English: Reflecting on the Challenges of Coherence, Cumulative Learning, Portability and Face Validity.” Australian Journal of Education 55(3):197–213. doi:10.1177/000494411105500303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maton, K. 2010. “Analysing Knowledge Claims and Practices: Languages of Legitimation.” In Social Realism, Knowledge and the Sociology of Education: Coalitions of the Mind, edited by K. Maton, and R. Moore, 35–59. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. 2014. Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a Realist Sociology of Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K. 2016. “Legitimation Code Theory: Building Knowledge about Knowledge-Building.” In Knowledge Building: Educational Studies in Legitimation Code Theory, edited by K. Maton, S. Hood, and S. Shay, 1–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maton, K., and R. T. Chen. 2016. “LCT and Qualitative Research: Creating a Language of Description to Study Constructivist Pedagogy.” In Knowledge Building: Educational Studies in Legitimation Code Theory, edited by K. Maton, S. Hood, and S. Shay, 27–48. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh, L., and N. Baker. 2009. “Feedback to Feed Forward: Student Response to Tutors’ Written Comments on Assignments.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 3(1):20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, J. 2009. “Computer Skills of First-Year Students at a South African University.” Paper presented at the South African Computer Lecturers Association Annual conference, Mpekwane Beach Resort, South Africa, 29 June–1 July.
   Google Scholar
• Orsmond, P., S. J. Maw, J. R. Park, S. Gomez, and A. C. Crook. 2013. “Moving Feedback Forward: Theory to Practice.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 38(2):240–252. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, H. J., S. Hepplestone, G. Holden, B. Irwin, and L. Thorpe. 2012. “A Role for Technology in Enhancing Students’ Engagement with Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 37(8):963–973. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.592934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokorny, H., and P. Pickford. 2010. “Complexity, Cues and Relationships: Student Perceptions of Feedback.” Active Learning in Higher Education 11(1):21–30. doi:10.1177/1469787409355872.
   Google Scholar
• van Heerden, M. 2018. “What Lies Beneath Tutors’ Feedback? Examining the Role of Feedback in Developing ‘Knowers’ in English Studies.” PhD diss., University of the Western Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. R. 2006. “Do Students Value Feedback? Student Perceptions of Tutors’ Written Responses.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 31(3):379–394. doi:10.1080/02602930500353061.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtas, O. 1998. “Feedback? No Just Give Us the Answers.” Times Higher Education Supplement, 25 September 1998.
   Google Scholar