Development of a formative peer observation protocol for STEM faculty reflection

References

• Amrein-Beardsley, A., and S. E. Osborn Popp. 2012. “Peer Observations among Faculty in a College of Education: Investigating the Summative and Formative Uses of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP).” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 24(1):5–24. doi:10.1007/s11092-011-9135-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, D. J. 2008. “Peer Review and Evaluation of the Intellectual Work of Teaching.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 40(2):48–51. doi:10.3200/CHNG.40.2.48-51.
   Google Scholar
• Brent, R., and R. M. Felder. 2004. “A Protocol for Peer Review of Teaching.” In Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cosh, J. 1999. “Peer Observation: A Reflective Model.” ELT Journal 53(1):22–27. doi:10.1093/elt/53.1.22.
   Google Scholar
• Dormant, D., and J. Lee. 2011. “The Chocolate Model of Change.” Lulu.com. https://books.google.com/books?id=HlhEAwAAQBAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, S., and C. Klopper. 2014. “Evaluating Faculty Pedagogic Practices to Inform Strategic Academic Professional Development: A Case of Cases.” Higher Education 67(3):349–367. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9657-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, S. L., M. Converse, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2015. “PORTAAL: A Classroom Observation Tool Assessing Evidence-Based Teaching Practices for Active Learning in Large Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Classes.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 47(2):ar23. doi:10.1187/cbe-14-06-0095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flick, L. B., P. Sadri, P. D. Morrell, C. Wainwright, and A. Schepige. 2009. “A Cross Discipline Study of Reformed Teaching by University Science and Mathematics Faculty.” School Science and Mathematics 109(4):197–211. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18258.x.
   Google Scholar
• Gormally, C., M. Evans, and P. Brickman. 2014. “Feedback about Teaching in Higher Ed: Neglected Opportunities to Promote Change.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 13(2):187–199. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G., and G. M. Gillmore. 1997. “No Pain, No Gain? The Importance of Measuring Course Workload in Student Ratings of Instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89(4):743–751. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, E. D., T. Kaufman, and D. Doty. 2014. “Rethinking Classroom Observation.” Educational Leadership 71(8):24–29. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2007.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C., A. Beach, and N. Finkelstein. 2011. “Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Instructional Practices: An Analytic Review of the Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(8):952–984. doi:10.1002/tea.20439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, H. C., C. Y. Charalambous, and M. A. Kraft. 2012. “When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough.” Educational Researcher 41(2):56–64. doi:10.3102/0013189X12437203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hora, M. T., A. Oleson, and J. J. Ferrare. 2013. “Teaching Dimensions Observation Protocol (TDOP).” https://one.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/research/pub/alcohol-laws/08History/1_introduction.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, A., J. Martin, J. Mitchele, and T. Newele. 2003. “A Concept Inventory for Heat Transfer.” In 33rd Annual Frontiers in Education, 2003 (FIE 2003), Vol. 1, T3D_12–T3D_16. IEEE. doi:10.1109/FIE.2003.1263338.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, E. S., and S. E. Harris. 2015. “A New Tool for Measuring Student Behavioral Engagement in Large University Classes.” Research and Teaching 44(6):83.
   Google Scholar
• Langen, J. M. 2011. “Evaluation of Adjunct Faculty in Higher Education Institutions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36(2):185–196. doi:10.1080/02602930903221501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, L., and G. Nicholls. 2005. “Enhancing Teaching Quality through Peer Review of Teaching.” Quality in Higher Education 11(2):137–149. doi:10.1080/13538320500175118.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, T. J., M. Pilarz, J. B. Velasco, D. Chakraverty, K. Rosploch, M. Undersander, and M. Stains. 2015. “The Best of Both Worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP Observation Protocols to Easily and Reliably Measure Various Levels of Reformed Instructional Practice.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 14(2):ar18. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-10-0168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, G. A., and J. M. Double. 1998. “Developing Higher Education Teaching Skills through Peer Observation and Collaborative Reflection.” Innovations in Education & Training International 35(2):161–170. doi:10.1080/1355800980350210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCartney, M. 2019. “Debunking an Active-Learning Myth.” Science 363(6425):361–362. doi:10.1126/science.363.6425.361-e.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, H. G. 1983. “Low-Inference Classroom Teaching Behaviors and Student Ratings of College Teaching Effectiveness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 75(1):138–149. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.75.1.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottis, K. E. K., M. J. Prince, and M. A. Vigeant. 2010. “Building an Understanding of Heat Transfer Concepts in Undergraduate Chemical Engineering Courses.” US-China Education Review 7(2):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Peel, D. 2005. “Peer Observation as a Transformatory Tool?” Teaching in Higher Education 10(4):489–504. doi:10.1080/13562510500239125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, V., C. James, H. E. Dillon, T. Prestholdt, S. Salomone, and E. Anctil. 2019. “Spreading Evidence-Based Instructional Practices: Modeling Change Using Peer Observation.” In The Annual Conference on Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Oklahoma City, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenfeld, A. H. 2013. “Classroom Observations in Theory and Practice.” ZDM 45(4):607–621. doi:10.1007/s11858-012-0483-1.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, P., M. Demonbrun, M. Borrego, C. J. Finelli, M. J. Prince, C. Henderson, and C. Waters. 2015. “Development of an Observation Protocol to Study Undergraduate Engineering Student Resistance to Active Learning.” International Journal of Engineering Education 31(2):597–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortland, S. 2010. “Feedback Within Peer Observation: Continuing Professional Development and Unexpected Consequences.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 47(3):295–304. doi:10.1080/14703297.2010.498181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., E. L. Vinson, J. A. Smith, J. D. Lewin, and M. R. Stetzer. 2014. “A Campus-Wide Study of STEM Courses: New Perspectives on Teaching Practices and Perceptions.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 13(4):624–635. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-06-0108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. K., F. H. M. Jones, S. L. Gilbert, and C. E. Wieman. 2013. “The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS): A New Instrument to Characterize University STEM Classroom Practices.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 12(4):618–627. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-08-0154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, J. M., M. V. DiVall, J. Barr, M. Gonyeau, J. A. Van Amburgh, S. J. Matthews, and D. Qualters. 2008. “Development of a Peer Teaching-Assessment Program and a Peer Observation and Evaluation Tool.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 72(6):147. doi:10.5688/aj7206147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tworek, H. 2014. “Writing a Student Evaluation Can Be Like Trolling the Internet.” The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/05/writing-a-student-evaluation-can-be-kind-of-like-trolling-a-comments-section/371240/.
   Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., C. A. White, and D. W. Gonzalez. 2017. “Meta-Analysis of Faculty’s Teaching Effectiveness: Student Evaluation of Teaching Ratings and Student Learning Are Not Related.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 54:22. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiman, C. 2015. “A Better Way to Evaluate Undergraduate Teaching.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning. http://www.changemag.org/Archives/BackIssues/2015/January-February2015/better-way-full.html.
   Google Scholar
• Weiman, C., and S. Gilbert. 2014. “The Teaching Practices Inventory: A New Tool for Characterizing College and University Teaching in Mathematics and Science.” CBE—Life Sciences Education 13:552–569. doi:10.1187/cbe.14-02-0023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. P., and J. McTighe. 2005. Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculumn Development.
   Google Scholar