Quality and tyranny: competing discourses around a compulsory rubric

References

• Ajjawi, R., and D. Boud. 2017. “Researching Feedback Dialogue: An Interactional Analysis Approach.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 252–265. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford-Rowe, K., J. Herrington, and C. Brown. 2014. “Establishing the Critical Elements That Determine Authentic Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (2): 205–222. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.819566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. “Discourse in the novel.” In The dialogic imagination: Four essays, edited by M. Hoquist, 259–422. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2002. “Competing Discourses in the Classroom: A Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis of Girls’ and Boys’ Speech in Public Contexts.” Disclosure and Society 13 (6): 827–842. doi:10.1177/0957926502013006760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter, J. 2003. Positioning Gender in Discourse: A Feminist Methodology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bevitt, S. 2015. “Assessment Innovation and Student Experience: A New Assessment Challenge and Call for a Multi-Perspective Approach to Assessment Research.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 103–119. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.890170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. 2017. “Education, Measurement and the Professions: Reclaiming a Space for Democratic Professionality in Education.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (4): 315–330. doi:10.1080/00131857.2015.1048665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (1): 101–111. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAST. 2018. “About Universal Design for Learning.” CAST, Accessed 4 September. http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html#.W428mTl9iUk.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. 2019. The Good University. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, J. J., F. M. Van Der Kleij, and L. Adie. 2019. “Contesting Educational Assessment Policies in Australia.” Journal of Education Policy 34 (6):836–857. doi:10.1080/02680939.2019.1608375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. 2017. “Assessment Rubrics: Towards Clearer and More Replicable Design, Research and Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (3): 347–360. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin University. 2016. “Deakin University Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Higher Education Agenda 2016-2020.” Deakin University. Accessed 18 June. https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1099305/Deakin-Aboriginal-and-Torres-Strait-Islander-HEd-Agenda-2016-2020-update-Jun-1-2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin University. 2019a. “Assessing Learning.” Deakin University. Accessed 18 June. https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/teaching-and-learning/assessing-and-evaluating.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin University. 2019b. “Deakin Graduate Learning Outcomes.” Deakin University. Accessed 18 June. https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/teaching-and-learning/deakin-graduate-learning-outcomes.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin University. 2019c. “Deakin Policy Library: Academic Freedom Policy.” Deakin University. Accessed 20 June. https://policy.deakin.edu.au/view.current.php?id=00027.
   Google Scholar
• Desire2learn. 2019. “Easily Create and Use Rubrics in BrightSpace.” YouTube.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, A. M. 2011. “Governing Student Assessment: Administrative Rules, Silenced Academics and Performing Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (2): 213–223. doi:10.1080/02602930903277727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1970. “The Order of Discourse.” In Untying the Text: A Poststructuralist Reader, edited by R. Young, 51–78. Oxon: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976/1978. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books. doi:10.1086/ahr/84.4.1020.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1989. The Archaeology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1972. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 2006. “Academic Freedom under Fire.” College Literature 33 (4): 1–42. doi:10.1353/lit.2006.0051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 2010. “Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy.” Policy Futures in Education 8 (6): 715–721. doi:10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., and E. Care. 2015. “Preface.” In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, i–x. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., L. Earl, and M. Schmidt. 2002. “Perspectives on Alternative Assessment Reform.” American Educational Research Journal 39 (1): 69–95. doi:10.3102/00028312039001069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., T. Ryan, and M. Phillips. 2019. “The Challenges of Feedback in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1–16. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. 2006. “The Trouble with Rubrics.” English Journal 95 (4): 12–15. doi:10.2307/30047080.
   Google Scholar
• Jonsson, A., and G. Svingby. 2007. “The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences.” Educational Research Review 2 (2): 130–144. doi:. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, T. 2015. Developing Writing Teachers: Practical Ways for Teacher-Writers to Transform Their Classroom Practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malecka, B. 2019. “Assessment Shock: Chinese Students’ First Year Experiences in Australian Universities. CRADLE Seminar Series.” CRADLE News: Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning. Accessed 27 June. https://blogs.deakin.edu.au/cradle/2019/05/28/assessment-shock-chinese-students-first-year-experiences-in-australian-universities-cradle-seminar-series/.
   Google Scholar
• Matshedisho, K. R. 2019. “Straddling Rows and Columns: Students’ (Mis)Conceptions of an Assessment Rubric.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1–11. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1616671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, L. 2019. “The Life-Changing Magic of Marking: A post-Kondo Approach to Assessment in English.” IDIOM 55 (1):17–20.
   Google Scholar
• McKnight, L., and E. Charlton. 2018. “Pathways and Praxis: Designing Curriculum for Aspirational Programs.” In University Pathways Programs: Local Responses within a Growing Global Trend, edited by Eva B. and Cintia A. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miano, A. 2004. “Voices in Dialogue: Hybridity as Literacy, Literacy as Hybridity.” In Bahktinian Perspectives on Language, Literacy and Learning, edited by Arnetha B. and Sarah W, 307–314. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C. 2010a. “Defining academic freedom.” Inside Higher Education, December 12. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2010/12/21/defining-academic-freedom.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, C. 2010b. No University is an Island: Saving Academic Freedom. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paridies, Y. 2019. “Embedding Indigenous Knowledges and Perspectives.” In Master of Teaching Professional Learning Seminar. Melbourne: Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, C. J., D. Peach, C. Pocknee, F. Webb, M. Fletcher, and G. Pretto. 2008. “The WIL [Work Integrated Learning].” In Report: A National Scoping Study [Australian Teaching and Learning Council Final Report]. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 1997. “What’s Wrong- and What’s Right- with Rubrics.” Educational Leadership October:72–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2016. “Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia.” Critical Studies in Education 57 (2): 175–190. doi:10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaper, R. 2017. “Tracing Assessment Policy Discourses in Neoliberalised Higher Education Settings.” Journal of Education Policy 32 (3): 322–339. doi:10.1080/02680939.2016.1257160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2011. “Academic Freedom, Achievement Standards and Professional Identity.” Quality in Higher Education 17 (1): 85–100. doi:10.1080/13538322.2011.554639.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus, J. J. 2008. “Student Ratings in a Consumerist Academy: Leveraging Pedagogical Control and Authority.” Sociological Perspectives 51 (2): 397–422. doi:10.1525/sop.2008.51.2.397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1998. Recommendation concerning the Status of Higher-Education Teaching Personnel. Paris: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000113234.page=2.
   Google Scholar
• Villarroel, V., S. Bloxham, D. Bruna, C. Bruna, and C. Herrera-Seda. 2018. “Authentic Assessment: Creating a Blueprint for Course Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 840–854. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkerdine, V. 1990. Schoolgirl Fictions. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. 1990. “The Case for Authentic Assessment.” Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 2 (2): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2016. “Digital Education Governance: An Introduction.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 3–13. doi:10.1177/1474904115616630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. 2006. Re-Thinking Rubrics in Writing Assessment. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwend, K. E. 2009. “Dilemmas and Discourses of Learning to Write: Assessment as a Contested site.” NCTE Journal 86 (5): 341–351.
   Google Scholar
• Work Integrated Learning. 2019. “Good Practice Guide: Assessment.” Australian Collaborative Education Network. Accessed 18 June. http://acen.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Assessment-WIL-Good-Practice-Guides.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yunkaporta, T. 2009. “Aboriginal Pedagogies at the Cultural Interface.” PhD, James Cook University.
   Google Scholar