Benchmarking Australian enabling programmes: assuring quality, comparability and transparency

References

• Australian Government. 2003. Higher Education Support Act 2003. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2019. Review of the Australian Qualifications Framework Final Report 2019. Canberra, October.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., and E. Irwin. 2015a. “Enabling Typology.” NAEEA. http://enablingeducators.org/enablingtypology/
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S., and E. Irwin. 2015b. “A National Audit of Academic Literacies Provision in Enabling Courses in Australian Higher Education (HE) Association for Academic Language and Learning.” Association for Academic Language and Learning. Accessed 1 November 2019. http://www.aall.org.au/sites/default/files/Baker-Irwin_AALL-rep
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. 1996. “Constructive Alignment in University Teaching.” Higher Education 32 (3): 347–364. doi:10.1007/BF00138871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. 2009. “Marking and Moderation in the UK: False Assumptions and Wasted Resources.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 209–220. doi:10.1080/02602930801955978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and P. Boyd. 2012. “Accountability in Grading Student Work: Securing Academic Standards in a Twenty-First Century Quality Assurance Context.” British Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 615–634. doi:10.1080/01411926.2011.569007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., J. Hudson, B. den Outer, and M. Price. 2015. “External Peer Review of Assessment: An Effective Approach to Verifying Standards?” Higher Education Research & Development 34 (6): 1069–1082. doi:10.1080/07294360.2015.1024629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., C. Hughes, and L. Adie. 2016. “What’s the Point of Moderation? A Discussion of the Purposes Achieved through Contemporary Moderation Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 638–653. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1039932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S., and M. Price. 2015. “External Examining: Fit for Purpose?” Studies in Higher Education 40 (2): 195–211. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.823931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, S., J. Beckett, and C. Saunders. 2016. “Peer Review of Assessment Network: Supporting Comparability of Standards.” Quality Assurance in Education 24 (2): 194–210. doi:10.1108/QAE-01-2015-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, S., A. Melano, H. Sainsbury, and L. Woodley. 2011. “Articulating and Comparing Standards through Benchmarking of Assessment.” In The 20th Annual Australian Quality Forum (AUQF), pp 38–47. Melbourne: AUQA.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, D., P. Noonan, H. Nugent, and B. Scales. 2008. Review of Australian Higher Education: Final Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J. 2018. “Large Class Teaching: How Does One Go about the Task of Moderating Large Volumes of Assessment?” Active Learning in Higher Education 19 (2): 173–185. doi:10.1177/1469787417721360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesters, J., and L. Watson. 2016. “Staying Power: The Effect of Pathway into University on Student Achievement and Attrition.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 56 (2): 225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H. 2010. “Defining and Monitoring Academic Standards in Australian Higher Education.” Higher Education Management and Policy 22 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1787/hemp-v22-art2-en.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe, S., K. Cresswell, A. Robertson, G. Huby, A. Avery, and A. Sheikh. 2011. “The Case Study Approach.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 11: 100–109. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/100. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Skills and Employment. 2019a. “uCube – Higher Education Statistics.” http://highereducationstatistics.education.gov.au/
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Skills and Employment. 2019b. “Consultation Paper on the Reallocation of Commonwealth Supported Places for Enabling, Sub Bachelor and Postgraduate Courses.” https://docs.education.gov.au/node/51631
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, M. 2013. “Bridging Socio-Cultural Incongruity: Conceptualising the Success of Students from Low Socio-Economic Status Backgrounds in Australian Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 38 (6): 939–949. doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.613991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epper, R. M. 1999. “Applying Benchmarking to Higher Education: Some Lessons from Experience.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 31 (6): 24–31. doi:10.1080/00091389909604230.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., K. Purnell, and R. Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality through Substantive Conversations between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1080/02602930601125681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habel, C., K. Whitman, and J. Stokes. 2016. Exploring the Experience of Low-SES Students via Enabling Pathways. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), Curtin University.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, M. E., and B. M. Kleiner. 2000. “12 Steps to Better Benchmarking.” Industrial Management 42 (2): 20–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmundt, S., and D. Baker. 2017. “Encouraging Engagement in Enabling Programmes: The Students’ Perspective.” Student Success 8 (1): 25–33. doi:10.5204/ssj.v8i1.357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellmundt, S., and J. Doyle. 2016. “Enabling Programme-Active Involvement of both Students and Tutors in Assuring Assessment Quality.” http://flipcurric.edu.au/articles/type-of-powerful-assessment-other
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, B., T. Bedford, J. Hartley, C. Klinger, N. Murray, J. O’Rourke, and N. Schofield. 2013. Enabling Retention: Processes and Strategies for Improving Student Retention in University-Based Enabling Programmes: Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, E., S. Baker, and B. Carter. 2018. “What ‘Counts’ as Numeracy Preparation in Enabling Education Programmes? Results of a National Audit.” Journal of Academic Language and Learning 12 (1): A141–A155. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. 2000. “Benchmarking Educational Processes and Outcomes.” In Benchmarking for Higher Education, edited by N. Jackson and H. Lund, 30–41. Florence, KY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kahu, E. R., and K. Nelson. 2018. “Student Engagement in the Educational Interface: Understanding the Mechanisms of Student Success.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (1): 58–71. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kift, S. 2009. Articulating a Transition Pedagogy to Scaffold and to Enhance the First Year Student Learning Experience in Australian Higher Education: Final Report for ALTC Senior Fellowship Program. Strawberry Hills, NSW: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K., G. Scott, K. Aubin, H. Alexander, T. Angelo, S. Campbell, M. Carroll, et al. 2014. Assuring Learning and Teaching Standards through Inter-Institutional Peer Review and Moderation: Final Report of the Project. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• May, J., J. Delahunty, S. O’Shea, and C. Stone. 2016. “Seeking the Passionate Career: First‐in‐Family Enabling Students and the Idea of the Australian University.” Higher Education Quarterly 70 (4): 384–399. doi:10.1111/hequ.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, J., M. Devlin. 2014. “‘Uni Has a Different Language… to the Real World’: Demystifying Academic Culture and Discourse for Students from Low Socioeconomic Backgrounds.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (5): 949–961. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.890570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, K. R., D. Davis, and S. H. Walker. 2000. Benchmarking: A Manual for Australian Universities. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Higher Education Division.
   Google Scholar
• Meade, P. H. 1998. A Guide to Benchmarking. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, C., and J. A. Taylor. 2013. “Benchmarking as a Catalyst for Institutional Change in Student Assessment.” In Marking Time: Leading and Managing the Development of Assessment in Higher Education, edited by K. Coleman and A. Flood, 25–39. Champaign, IL: Common Ground Research Networks. doi:10.18848/978-1-61229-123-9/CGP.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. J., J. A. Clarke, S. M. Kift, and T. A. Creagh. 2011. “Trends in Policies, Programmes and Practices in the Australasian First Year Experience Literature 2000-2010.” The First Year in Higher Education Research Series on Evidence-Based Practice. Number 1. http://fyhe.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/FYHE_Research-Series_No-1_FIN_eBook_2012WM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, B., P. De Lange, M. Freeman, P. Hancock, A. Abraham, B. Howieson, and K. Watty. 2016. “Does Calibration Reduce Variability in the Assessment of Accounting Learning Outcomes?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (3): 331–349. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, J., B. Relf, N. Crawford, and S. Sharp. 2020. “Are We All on Course? A Curriculum Mapping Comparison of Three Australian University Open-Access Enabling Programs.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 59 (1): 7–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman, T., S. Trinidad, M. Devlin, A. Harvey, M. Brett, and J. McKay. 2016. Pathways to Higher Education: The Efficacy of Enabling and Sub-Bachelor Pathways for Disadvantaged Students. Perth: National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. 2005. “Assessment Standards: The Role of Communities of Practice and the Scholarship of Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 215–230.
   Google Scholar
• Relf, B., N. Crawford, J. O’Rourke, S. Sharp, B. Hodges, M. Shah, and R. K. Barnes. 2017. “Lighting the Path (Way): Articulating Curriculum Design Principles for Open Access Enabling Programmes.” Sydney: Office of Learning and Teaching, Department of Education. https://ltr.edu.au/resources/SD15-5063_NEWC_Relf_Final%20Report_2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roche, T. 2018. “Benchmarking Australian University Direct-Entry Programmes: Externally Referencing EAP Assessment Outcomes.” Paper presented to Applied Linguistics Association of Australia Conference, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, November 26–28, unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, T., and S. Booth. 2019. “External Referencing of ELICOS Direct Entry Programme Standards: UECA National Report 2019.” UECA. https://ueca.edu.au/initiatives/
   Google Scholar
• Roche, T., and S. Syme. 2018. “Enabling Future Directions: NAEEA Invited Panel.” Student Success 9 (1): 1–7. doi:10.5204/ssj.v9i1.428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, C., B. O’Donovan, and M. Price. 2005. “A Social Constructivist Assessment Process Model: How the Research Literature Shows Us This Could Be Best Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Assuring Academic Achievement Standards at Griffith University.” 1–7. Griffith University: Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2013. “Assuring Academic Achievement Standards: From Moderation to Calibration.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 20 (1): 5–19. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. n.d. “Benchmarking: A Literature Review.” Western Australia: Edith Cowan University. https://intranet.ecu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/357193/Benchmarking-Literature-Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sefcik, L., S. Bedford, P. Czech, J. Smith, and J. Yorke. 2018. “Embedding External Referencing of Standards into Higher Education: Collaborative Relationships Are the Key.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (1): 45–57. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1278584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, M., and R. Whannell. 2017. “Open Access Enabling Courses: Risking Academic Standards or Meeting Equity Aspirations.” Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 21 (2-3): 51–62. doi:10.1080/13603108.2016.1203370.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. 2004. “The Assessment of Complex Performance: A Socially Situated Interpretive Act.” Harvard Educational Review 74 (3): 307–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella, A., and D. Woodhouse. 2007. Benchmarking in Australian Higher Education: A Thematic Analysis of AUQA Audit Reports. Melbourne, VIC: Australian Universities Quality Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. A., and C. Morgan. 2011. Excellence in Assessment Project: Final Report. Lismore, NSW: Teaching and Learning Centre: Southern Cross University.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. A., T. van Eyk, and S. Syme. 2020. “Enabling Success at University: The Impact of an Australian Programme to Provide Access to University.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 44 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2018.1504011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEQSA. 2019a. “Guidance Note: ELICOS Pathway Entry.” Canberra: Australian Government. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/latest-news/publications/guidance-note-elicos-direct-entry
   Google Scholar
• TEQSA. 2019b. “Guidance Note: External Referencing (including Benchmarking).” Canberra: Australian Government. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/sites/default/files/guidance-note-external-referencing-v2-5.pdf?v=1555376082
   Google Scholar
• Watty, K., M. Freeman, B. Howieson, P. Hancock, B. O’Connell, P. De Lange, and A. Abraham. 2014. “Social Moderation, Assessment and Assuring Standards for Accounting Graduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (4): 461–478. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.848336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 1982. “Studying Phenomenon and Context across Sites.” American Behavioral Scientist 26 (1): 84–100. doi:10.1177/000276482026001007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., P. Bridges, and H. Woolf. 2000. “Mark Distributions and Marking Practices in UK Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 1 (1): 7–27. doi:10.1177/1469787400001001002.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. 1999. “Benchmarking Academic Standards in the UK.” Tertiary Education and Management 5 (1): 79–94. doi:10.1023/A:1018753222965.
   Google Scholar
• Zahra, D., I. Robinson, M. Roberts, L. Coombes, J. Cockerill, and S. Burr. 2017. “Rigour in Moderation Processes Is More Important than the Choice of Method.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1159–1167. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1236183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar