What matters in design? Cultivating undergraduates’ critical thinking through online peer assessment in a Confucian heritage context

References

• Anderson, T., C. Howe, R. Soden, J. Halliday, and J. Low. 2001. “Peer Interaction and the Learning of Critical Thinking Skills in Further Education Students.” Instructional Science 29 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1023/A:1026471702353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. 1997. “A Critical Approach to Critical Thinking in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 31 (1): 71–94. doi:10.2307/3587975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azungah, T. 2018. “Qualitative Research: Deductive and Inductive Approaches to Data Analysis.” Qualitative Research Journal 18 (4): 383–400. doi:10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbear, J. 2003. “Essential Elements of Lessons Designed to Promote Critical Thinking.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 3 (3): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bruning, R. H., G. J. Schraw, M. N. Norby, and R. R. Ronning. 2004. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, A. S. 2013. Critical Academic Writing and Multilingual Students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2011. From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dominguez, C., Nascimento, M. M. R. Payan-Carreira, G. Cruz, H. Silva, H. J. Lopes, M. F. A. Morais, and E. Morais. 2015. “Adding Value to the Learning Process by Online Peer Review Activities: Towards the Elaboration of a Methodology to Promote Critical Thinking in Future Engineers.” European Journal of Engineering Education 40 (5): 573–591. doi:10.1080/03043797.2014.987649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filius, R. M., R. A. de Kleijn, S. G. Uijl, F. J. Prins, H. V. van Rijen, and D. E. Grobbee. 2018. “Strengthening Dialogic Peer Feedback Aiming for Deep Learning in SPOCs.” Computers & Education 125: 86–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrill, E. 2006. Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Improving the Quality of Judgments and Decisions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gikandi, J. W., and D. Morrow. 2016. “Designing and Implementing Peer Formative Feedback within Online Learning Environments.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 (2): 153–170. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiller, J., A. Durndell, and A. Ross. 2008. “Peer Interaction and Critical Thinking: Face-to-Face or Online Discussion?” Learning and Instruction 18 (2): 187–200. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. 2001. “Assessing Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction.” The Journal of General Education 50 (4): 270–286. doi:10.1353/jge.2001.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F. 2013. Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, G., and D. Hughes. 1995. Research and the Teacher. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ivie, S. D. 2001. “Metaphor: A Model for Teaching Critical Thinking.” Contemporary Education 72 (1): 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, A. E., J. Hardy, and R. K. Galloway. 2018. “Learning from Peer Feedback on Student-Generated Multiple Choice Questions: Views of Introductory Physics Students.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 14 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. B., D. M. McInerney, and D. A. Watkins. 2013. “Examining the Role of Social Goals in School: A Study in Two Collectivist Cultures.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 28 (4): 1505–1523. doi:10.1007/s10212-013-0179-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, C. V. Hunter, X. Guo, and R. Tywoniw. 2020. “Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning? a Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., X. Liu, and Y. Zhou. 2012. “Give and Take: A Re‐Analysis of Assessor and Assessee's Roles in Technology‐Facilitated Peer Assessment.” British Journal of Educational Technology 43 (3): 376–384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01180.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., A. Steckelberg, and S. Srinivasan. 2008. “Utilizing Peer Interactions to Promote Learning through a Web-Based Peer Assessment System.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 34 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, G. Y. 2018. “Anonymous versus Identified Peer Assessment via a Facebook-Based Learning Application: Effects on Quality of Peer Feedback, Perceived Learning, Perceived Fairness, and Attitude toward the System.” Computers & Education 116: 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., L. Frankel, and K. C. Roohr. 2014. “Assessing Critical Thinking in Higher Education: Current State and Directions for Next‐Generation Assessment.” ETS Research Report Series 1: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Li, and Z. Zhang. 2018. “Small Group Discussion as a Key Component in Online Assessment Training for Enhanced Student Learning in Web-Based Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 207–222. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, V. L., and I. V. Ashby. 2018. “Supporting the Development of Collaboration and Feedback Skills in Instructional Designers.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 (1): 72–92. doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, L. M., and D. F. Halpern. 2011. “Pedagogy for Developing Critical Thinking in Adolescents: Explicit Instruction Produces Greatest Gains.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 6 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, S. E., L. Blakemore, and L. Marks. 2017. “Is Peer Review an Appropriate Form of Assessment in a MOOC? Student Participation and Performance in Formative Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 1000–1013. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1221052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostert, M., and J. D. Snowball. 2013. “Where Angels Fear to Tread: Online Peer-Assessment in a Large First-Year Class.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 674–686. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.683770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, L., L. S. Behar-Horenstein, and C. W. Garvan. 2013. “Do Instructional Interventions Influence College Students’ Critical Thinking Skills? a Meta-Analysis.” Educational Research Review 9: 114–128. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., H. Biemans, and M. Mulder. 2016. “Relations between Scripted Online Peer Feedback Processes and Quality of Written Argumentative Essay.” The Internet and Higher Education 31: 20–31. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novakovich, J. 2016. “Fostering Critical Thinking and Reflection through Blog‐Mediated Peer Feedback.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32 (1): 16–30. doi:10.1111/jcal.12114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., and M. Alqassab. 2019. “An Empirical Review of Anonymity Effects in Peer Assessment, Peer Feedback, Peer Review, Peer Evaluation and Peer Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1253–1278. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pithers, R. T., and R. Soden. 2000. “Critical Thinking in Education: A Review.” Educational Research 42 (3): 237–249. doi:10.1080/001318800440579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretorius, L., G. P. van Mourik, and C. Barratt. 2017. “Student Choice and Higher-Order Thinking: Using a Novel Flexible Assessment Regime Combined with Critical Thinking Activities to Encourage the Development of Higher Order Thinking.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 29 (2): 389–401.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, F. J., D. M. Sluijsmans, P. P. A. Kirschner, and J. W. Strijbos. 2005. “Formative Peer Assessment in a CSCL Environment: A Case Study.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (4): 417–444. doi:10.1080/02602930500099219.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio‐Cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig, B., P. Blanco-Anaya, I. M. Bargiela, and B. Crujeiras-Pérez. 2019. “A Systematic Review on Critical Thinking Intervention Studies in Higher Education across Professional Fields.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (5): 860–869. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1586333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. L., P. B. Lowry, and P. D. Sweeney. 2006. “An Evaluation of the Impact of Social Presence through Group Size and the Use of Collaborative Software on Group Member" Voice" in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Task Groups.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49 (1): 28–43. doi:10.1109/TPC.2006.870460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, R. S. 2006. “The Academic Journal Review Process as a Framework for Student Developmental Peer Feedback.” Journal of Management Education 30 (2): 378–398. doi:10.1177/1052562905277185.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. 2017. “An Exploration of Asynchronous and Synchronous Feedback Modes in EFL Writing.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 29 (3): 496–513. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. 2016. “The Comprehensive Assessment of Rational Thinking.” Educational Psychologist 51 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1080/00461520.2015.1125787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupple, E. J., F. A. Maratos, J. Elander, T. E. Hunt, K. Y. Cheung, and A. V. Aubeeluck. 2017. “Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a Measure of Student Attitudes and Beliefs about Critical Thinking.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 23: 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., and G. D. Low. 2011. “Critical Thinking and Chinese University Students: A Review of the Evidence.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 24 (1): 61–76. doi:10.1080/07908318.2010.546400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, A., A. Avery, and P. Lai. 2003. “Critical Thinking Disposition of Hong Kong Chinese and Australian Nursing Students.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 44 (3): 298–307. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02805.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., and Q. Li. 2013. “The Confucian Value of Harmony and Its Influence on Chinese Social Interaction.” Cross-Cultural Communication 9 (1): 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., and C. Kim. 2018. “The Effects of Autonomy Support on Student Engagement in Peer Assessment.” Educational Technology Research and Development 66 (1): 25–52. doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y., and Z. H. Wan. 2016. “Appreciated but Constrained: Reflective Practice of Student Teachers in Learning Communities in a Confucian Heritage Culture.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (6): 669–685. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1183622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y. 2019. “Conventional or Sustainable? Chinese University Students’ Thinking about Feedback Used in Their English Lessons.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (7): 973–986. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, Y. 2020. “Motivated or Informed? Chinese Undergraduates’ Beliefs about the Functions of Continuous Assessment in Their College English Course.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (5): 1055–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., W. Song, S. Shen, and R. Huang. 2014. “The Effects of Blog-Mediated Peer Feedback on Learners’ Motivation, Collaboration, and Course Satisfaction in a Second Language Writing Course.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 30 (6): 670–685. doi:10.14742/ajet.860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, L., P. Cui, X. Li, and R. Huang. 2018. “Synchronous Discussion between Assessors and Assessees in Web-Based Peer Assessment: Impact on Writing Performance, Feedback Quality, Meta-Cognitive Awareness and Self-Efficacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (3): 500–514. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar