Crisis? What crisis? Interpreting student feedback on assessment

References

• Anseel, F., and F. Lievens. 2009. “The Mediating Role of Feedback Acceptance in the Relationship between Feedback and Attitudinal and Performance Outcomes.” International Journal of Selection and Assessment 17 (4): 362–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashby, A., J. Richardson, and A. Woodley. 2011. “National Student Feedback Surveys in Distance Education: An Investigation at the UK Open University.” Open Learning 26 (1): 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. 1998. Emotion, Social Theory, and Social Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Barbalet, J. 2002. Emotions and Sociology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• BBC News. 2007. Students Bemoan Lack of Feedback. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/6990022.stm
   Google Scholar
• Boehler, M. L., D. A. Rogers, C. J. Schwind, R. Mayforth, J. Quin, R. G. Williams, and G. Dunnington. 2006. “An Investigation of Medical Student Reactions to Feedback: A Randomised Controlled Trial.” Medical Education 40 (8): 746–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, L., D. Hacker, P. O'Shea, and D. Allen. 2005. “The Influence of Overt Practice, Achievement Level, and Explanatory Style on Calibration Accuracy and Performance.” The Journal of Experimental Education 73 (4): 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boring, A., K. Ottoboni, and P. Stark. 2016. “Student Evaluations of Teaching (Mostly) Do Not Measure Teaching Effectiveness.” ScienceOpen Research.
   Google Scholar
• Boysen, G. 2017. “Statistical Knowledge and the Over-Interpretation of Student Evaluations of Teaching.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1095–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boysen, G., T. Kelly, H. Raesly, and R. Casner. 2014. “The (Mis)Interpretation of Teaching Evaluations by College Faculty and Administrators.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (6): 641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, A. 2012. Making It Count: Reflecting on the National Student Survey in the Process of Enhancement. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/resources/making_it_count.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Callendar, C., P. Ramsden, and J. Griggs. 2014. Review of the National Student Survey. Bristol: HEFCE. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce/content/pubs/indirreports/2014/Review,of,the,NSS/2014_nssreview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2006. “Differing Perceptions in the Feedback Process.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J., and H. Marsh. 2010. “National Student Survey: Are Differences between Universities and Courses Reliable and Meaningful?” Oxford Review of Education 36 (6): 693–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossman, J. 2007. “The Role of Relationships and Emotions in Student Perceptions of Learning and Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 26 (3): 313–327.
   Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. 2009. “Inference by Eye: Reading the Overlap of Independent Confidence Intervals.” Statistics in Medicine 28 (2): 205–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G., and S. Finch. 2005. “Inference by Eye: Confidence Intervals and How to Read Pictures of Data.” The American Psychologist 60 (2): 170–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., H. Henderson, P. Mahoney, P. Phillips, T. Ryan, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. 2019. “What Makes for Effective Feedback: Staff and Student Perspectives.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipboye, R., and R. de Pontbriand. 1981. “Correlates of Employee Reactions to Performance Appraisals and Appraisal Systems.” Journal of Applied Psychology 66 (2): 248–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, N., C. Was, J. Dunlosky, and R. Isaacson. 2017. “Even after Thirteen Class Exams, Students Are Still Overconfident: The Role of Memory for past Exam Performance in Student Predictions.” Metacognition and Learning 12 (1): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 2010. Dimensions of Quality. York: HEA. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/evidence_informed_practice/Dimensions_of_Quality.Pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. 2012. Implications of ‘Dimensions of Quality’ in a Market Environment. York: HEA. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/evidence_informed_practice/HEA_Dimensions_of_Quality_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A., and G. Gillmore. 1997. “Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings.” The American Psychologist 52 (11): 1209–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, B. 2004. “Grading Leniency, Grade Discrepancy, and Student Ratings of Instruction.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 29 (4): 410–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, H., A. McLean, R. Wass, E. Miller, and K. N. Sim. 2015. “An Assessment Arms Race and Its Fallout: High-Stakes Grading and the Case for Slow Scholarship.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (4): 528–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEFCE. 2014. UK Review of the Provision of Information about Higher Education. National Student Survey: Results and Trends Analysis 2005–2013. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/20480/.
   Google Scholar
• Ingleton, C. 1999. “Emotion in Learning: A Neglected Dynamic.” Proceedings of the HERDSA Annual International Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jawahar, I. 2006. “Correlates of Satisfaction with Performance Appraisal Feedback.” Journal of Labor Research 27 (2): 213–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahu, E., C. Stephens, L. Leach, and N. Zepke. 2015. “Linking Academic Emotions and Student Engagement: Mature-Aged Distance Students’ Transition to University.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 39 (4): 481–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandiko Howson, C., and A. Buckley. 2020. “Quantifying Learning: Measuring Student Outcomes in Higher Education in England.” Politics and Governance 8 (2): 6–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper, T. 1978. A Social Interactional Theory of Emotions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., and D. Dunning. 1999. “Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One’s Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 (6): 1121–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krzywinski, M., and N. Altman. 2013. “Points of Significance: Error Bars.” Nature Methods 10 (10): 921–922. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, M., P. Dunleavy, and A. Fielding. 2013. “Applying Models to National Surveys of Undergraduate Science Students: What Affects Ratings of Satisfaction?” Education Sciences 3 (2): 193–207.
   Google Scholar
• Lanzante, J. 2005. “A Cautionary Note on the Use of Error Bars.” Journal of Climate 18 (17): 3699–3703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, L. 2016. “Exploring Discipline Differences in Student Engagement in One Institution.” Higher Education Research & Development 35 (4): 772–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenton, P. 2015. “Determining Student Satisfaction: An Economic Analysis of the National Student Survey.” Economics of Education Review 47: 118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, G. M., and P. F. Buller. 1987. “User Acceptance of Peer Appraisals in an Industrial Setting.” Personnel Psychology 40 (4): 785–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H., and L. Roche. 2000. “Effects of Grading Leniency and Low Workload on Students' Evaluations of Teaching: Popular Myth, Bias, Validity, or Innocent Bystanders?” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (1): 202–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, N., and J. Lopus. 1994. “The Lake Wobegon Effect in Student Self-Reported Data.” The American Economic Review 84 (2): 201–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengel, F., J. Sauermann, and U. Zölitz. 2019. “Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations.” Journal of the European Economic Association 17 (2): 535–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivares, O. 2001. “Student Interest, Grading Leniency, and Teacher Ratings: A Conceptual Analysis.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 26 (3): 382–399. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. 1991. “A Performance Indicator of Teaching Quality in Higher Education: The Course Experience Questionnaire.” Studies in Higher Education 16 (2): 129–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P., and C. Callender. 2014. Review of the National Student Survey. Appendix A: Literature Review. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J., J. Slater, and J. Wilson. 2007. “The National Student Survey: Development, Findings and Implications.” Studies in Higher Education 32 (5): 557–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. 2017. “Feelings about Feedback: The Role of Emotions in Assessment for Learning.” In Scaling up Assessment for Learning in Higher Education: The Enabling Power of Assessment, Vol. 5, edited by Carless, D., Bridges, S., Chen, C., and Glofcheski, R., 159–172. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., and M. Henderson. 2018. “Feeling Feedback: Students’ Emotional Responses to Educator Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (6): 880–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saenz, G., L. Geraci, T. Miller, and R. Tirso. 2017. “Metacognition in the Classroom: The Association between Students' Exam Predictions and Their Desired Grades.” Consciousness and Cognition 51: 125–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenker, N., and J. Gentleman. 2001. “On Judging the Significance of Differences by Examining the Overlap between Confidence Intervals.” The American Statistician 55 (3): 182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. 2015. “‘My Work is Bleeding’: Exploring Students’ Emotional Responses to First-Year Assignment Feedback.” Teaching in Higher Education 20 (6): 614–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• THE. 2019. National Student Survey 2019: Overall Improvement Masks Falls. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/national-student-survey-2019-overall-improvement-masks-falls
   Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt, T. 2013. “Students Aggress against Professors in Reaction to Receiving Poor Grades: An Effect Moderated by Student Narcissism and Self-Esteem.” Aggressive Behavior 39 (1): 71–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Värlander, S. 2008. “The Role of Students’ Emotions in Formal Feedback Situations.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (2): 145–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, N., M. Rieger, and K. Voorvelt. 2016. “Gender, Ethnicity and Teaching Evaluations: Evidence from Mixed Teaching Teams.” Economics of Education Review 54: 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., and D. Boud. 2019. “Developing Assessment Feedback: From Occasional Survey to Everyday Practice.” In Engaging Student Voices in Higher Education: Diverse Perspectives and Expectations in Partnership, edited by Lygo-Baker, S., Kinchin, I. and Winstone, N., 109–124. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., R. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. “‘It'd Be Useful, but I Wouldn't Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., S. Orr, and B. Blair. 2014. “Hit by a Perfect Storm? Art & Design in the National Student Survey.” Studies in Higher Education 39 (10): 1788–1810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar