References
- Ashenafi, M. M. 2017. “Peer Assessment in Higher Education – Twenty-First Century Practices, Challenges and the Way Forward.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (2): 226–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711.
- Barker, M., and M. Pinard. 2014. “Closing the Feedback Loop? Iterative Feedback between Tutor and Student in Coursework Assessments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (8): 899–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.875985.
- Bharuthram, S. 2012. “Making a Case for the Teaching of Reading across the Curriculum in Higher Education.” South African Journal of Education 32 (2): 205–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n2a557.
- Bharuthram, S., and M. Van Heerden. 2020. “To Use or Not to Use? Understanding the Connection between Peer and Tutor Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning.” The Independent Journal of Teaching and Learning 15 (20): 24–35. https://ijtl.iie.ac.za/newpage9e8882be.
- Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
- Carless, D. 2019. “Feedback Loops and the Longer-Term: Towrads Feedback Spirals.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (5): 705–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108.
- Cassidy, S. 2006. “Developing Employability Skills: Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Education + Training 48 (7): 508–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910610705890.
- Cummins, J. 2000. Language, Power and Pedagogy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
- Dijks, M. A., L. Brummer, and D. Kostons. 2018. “The Anonymous Reviewer: The Relationship between Perceived Expertise and the Perceptions of Peer Feedback in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1258–1271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1447645.
- Gielen, S., E. Peeters, F. Dochy, P. Onghena, and K. Struyven. 2010. “Improving the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback for Learning.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 304–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007.
- Gravett, K. 2020. “Feedback Literacies as Sociomaterial Practice.” Critical Studies in Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099.
- Hamer, J., H. Purchase, A. Luxton-Reilly, and P. Denny. 2015. “A Comparison of Peer and Tutor Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (1): 151–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.893418.
- Ion, G., A. S. Martí, and T. A. Morell. 2019. “Giving or Receiving Feedback: Which Is More Beneficial to Students’ Learning?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 124–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1484881.
- Kim, M. 2009. “The Impact of an Elaborated Assessee’s Role in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 105–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930801955960.
- Lea, M., and B. Street. 1998. “Student Writing in Higher Education: An Academic Literacies Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 23 (2): 157–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364.
- Li, L. 2017. “The Role of Anonymity in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 645–656. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766.
- Li, L., X. Liu, and A. L. Steckelberg. 2010. “Assessor or Assessee: How Student Learning Improves by Giving and Receiving Peer Feedback.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (3): 525–536. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00968.x.
- Liu, N., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582.
- Lu, R., and L. Bol. 2007. “A Comparison of Anonymous versus Identifiable E-Peer Review on College Student Writing Performance and the Extent of Critical Feedback.” Journal of Interactive Online Learning 6 (2): 100–115. https://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.2.2.pdf.
- Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
- Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559.
- Nicol, D. 2011. Developing the Students’ Ability to Construct Feedback. Gloucester: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education. http://tinyurl.com/avp527r.
- Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
- Panadero, E., M. Romero, and J. Strijbos. 2013. “The Impact of a Rubric and Friendship on Peer Assessment: Effects on Construct Validity, Performance, and Perceptions of Fairness and Comfort.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (4): 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005.
- Panadero, E., and M. Alqassab. 2019. “An Empirical Review of Anonymity Effects in Peer Assessment, Peer Feedback, Peer Review, Peer Evaluation and Peer Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1253–1278. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1600186.
- Pitt, E., M. Bearman, and R. Esterhazy. 2020. “The Conundrum of Low Achievement and Feedback for Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 239–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1630363.
- Raes, A., E. Vanderhoven, and T. Schellens. 2015. “Increasing Anonymity in Peer Assessment by Using Classroom Response Technology within Face-To-Face Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (1): 178–193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.823930.
- Rotsaert, T., E. Panadero, and T. Schellens. 2018. “Anonymity as an Instructional Scaffold in Peer Assessment: Its Effects on Peer Feedback Quality and Evolution in Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment Skills.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 33 (1): 75–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8.
- Strijbos, J. W., T. A. Ochoa, D. M. A. Sluijsmans, M. Sergers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Fostering Interactivity through Formative Peer Assessment in (Web-Based) Collaborative Learning Environments.” In Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education: Integrating Human-Factors and Personalization, edited by C. Mourals, N. Tsianos, and P. Germanakos, 375–395. Hersey, PA: IGI Global.
- Vanderhoven, E., R. Raes, T. Schellens, and H. Montrieux. 2012. “Face-To-Face Peer Assessment in Secondary Education: Does Anonymity Mater?” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 69: 1340–1347. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-3096095. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.071.
- Walker, M. 2015. “The Quality of Written Peer Feedback on Undergraduates’ Draft Answers to an Assignment, and the Use Made of the Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40 (2): 232–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.898737.
- Yu, F., and C. Wu. 2011. “Different Identity Revelation Modes in Online Peer-Assessment Learning Environment: Effects on Perceptions towards Assessors, Classroom Climate and Learning Activities.” Computers & Education 57 (3): 2167–2177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.012.
- Zukas, M., and J. Malcolm. 2019. “Reassembling Academic Work: A Sociomaterial Investigation of Academic Learning.” Studies in Continuing Education 41 (3): 259–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1482861.