Using scaffolding strategies to improve formative assessment practice in higher education

References

• Antoniou, P., and M. James. 2014. “Developing a Framework of Actions and Strategies.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 26 (2): 153–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9188-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2012. “Developing a Theory of Formative Assessment.” In Assessment and Learning, edited by J. Gardner, 2nd ed., 11–32. London: SAGE Publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 25 (6): 551–575. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., P. Dawson, M. Bearman, S. Bennett, G. Joughin, and E. Molloy. 2018. “Reframing Assessment Research: Through a Practice Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (7): 1107–1118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1202913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, C., G. Skoog, and J. M. Dabbs. 2015. “A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment.” American Educational Research Journal 52 (5): 956–983. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215587754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck, G. A., A. Trauth‐Nare, and J. Kaftan. 2010. “ Making Formative Assessment Discernable to Pre‐Service Teachers of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (4): 402–421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, E., and S. Kim. 2015. “Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood.” Organizational Research Methods 18 (2): 207–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L., and W. Chan. 2017. “Testing the Difference between Reliability Coefficients Alfa and Omega.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 77 (2): 185–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164416658325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, J., and A. Hyde. 2008. “Controlling Response Shift Bias: The Use of the Retrospective Pre-Test Design in the Evaluation of a Master’s Programme.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (6): 699–709. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., J. L. Sabel, and M. Biggers. 2015. “Elementary Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment to Support Students’ Learning about Interactions between the Hydrosphere and Geosphere.” Journal of Geoscience Education 63 (3): 210–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/14-063.1.
   Google Scholar
• Gearhart, M., and E. Osmundson. 2009. “Assessment Portfolios as Opportunities for Teacher Learning.” Educational Assessment 14 (1): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190902816108.
   Google Scholar
• Goos, M., and Salomons, A. (2017). Measuring teaching quality in higher education: Assessing selection bias in course evaluations. Research in Higher Education58: 341–364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-016-9429-8.
   Google Scholar
• Gulikers, J. T. M., and L. K. J. Baartman. 2017. Doelgericht professionaliseren. Formatieve toetspraktijken met effect! Wat doet de docent in de klas? (405-15-722). https://edepot.wur.nl/440065
   Google Scholar
• Heitink, M. C., F. M. van der Kleij, B. P. Veldkamp, K. Schildkamp, and W. B. Kippers. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Prerequisites for Implementing Assessment for Learning in Classroom Practice.” Educational Research Review 17: 50–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G. 1980. “Response-Shift Bias: A Problem in Evaluating Interventions with Pre/Post Self Reports.” Evaluation Review 4 (1): 93–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X8000400105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenknecht, M., L. Wijnia, M. Köhlen, L. Fryer, R. Rikers, and S. Loyens. 2021. “Formative Assessment as Practice: The Role of Students’ Motivation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (2): 236–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1765228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Many, J. E. 2002. “An Exhibition and Analysis of Verbal Tapestries: Understanding How Scaffolding Is Woven into the Fabric of Instructional Conversations.” Reading Research Quarterly 37 (4): 376–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterwijk, P. R., L. A. van der Ark, and K. Sijtsma. 2019. “Using Confidence Intervals for Assessing Reliability of Real Tests.” Assessment 26 (7): 1207–1216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117737375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pata, K., E. Lehtinen, and T. Sarapuu. 2006. “Inter-Relations of Tutor’s and Peers’ Scaffolding and Descision-Making Discourse Acts.” Instructional Science 34 (4): 313–341. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-005-3406-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postholm, M. B. 2006. “The Teacher’s Role When Pupils Work on Task Using ICT in Project Work.” Educational Research 48 (2): 155–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880600732256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Socio-Cultural Theorisation of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701476386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., S. Myran, R. Strauss, and W. Reed. 2014. “The Impact of an Alternative Professional Development Model on Teacher Practices in Formative Assessment and Student Learning.” Teacher Development 18 (2): 141–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.900516.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., and E. M. Furtak. 2007. “Exploring Teachers’ Informal Formative Assessment Practices and Students’ Understanding in the Context of Scientific Inquiry.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 57–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sach, E. 2015. “An Exploration of Teachers’ Narratives: What Are the Facilitators and Constraints Which Promote or Inhibit ‘Good’ Formative Assessment Practices in Schools?” Education 43 (3): 3–13. .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schildkamp, K., F. M. Van der Kleij, M. C. Heitink, W. B. Kippers, and B. P. Veldkamp. 2020. “Formative Assessment: A Systematic Review of Critical Teacher Prerequisites for Classroom Practice.” International Journal of Educational Research 103: 101602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schütze, B., K. Rakoczy, E. Klieme, M. Besser, and D. Leiss. 2017. “Training Effects on Teachers’ Feedback Practice: The Mediating Function of Feedback Knowledge and the Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy.” ZDM 49 (3): 475–489. . doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0855-7.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. 2005. “Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding.” Educational Leadership 63 (3): 66–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. 2009. “On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha.” Psychometrika 74 (1): 107–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silliman, E. R., R. Bahr, J. Beasman, and L. Wilkinson. 2000. “Scaffolds for Learning to Read in an Inclusion Classroom.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 31 (3): 265–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3103.265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suurtamm, C., M. Koch, and A. Arden. 2010. “Teachers’ Assessment Practices in Mathematics: Classrooms in the Context of Reform.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 17 (4): 399–417. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.497469.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Grift, W. 2014. “Measuring Teaching Quality in Several European Countries.” School Effectiveness and School Improvement 25 (3): 295–311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.794845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Lans, R., W. van de Grift, and K. van Veen. (2015). “Developing a Teacher Evaluation Instrument to Provide Formative Feedback using Student Ratings of Teaching Acts.” Educational Measurement 34 (3): 18–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12078.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., N. de Vries, A. Poorthuis, and T. Mainhard. 2021. The Reliability and Validity of Student Perceptions of Teachers’ Adaptive Support during Seatwork: The Perceived Adaptivity Questionnaire [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Education, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2010. “Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (3): 271–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., M. Volman, and J. Beishuizen. 2012. “Promoting Teacher Scaffolding in Small-Group Work: A Contingency Perspective.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (2): 193–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Pol, J., M. Volman, F. Oort, and J. Beishuizen. 2014. “Teacher Scaffolding in Small-Group Work: An Intervention Study.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 23 (4): 600–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.805300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., and D. Boud. 2020. “The Need to Disentangle Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1779687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., and A. Renkl. 2008. “Why Instructional Explanations Often Do Not Work: A Framework for Understanding the Effectiveness of Instructional Explanations.” Educational Psychologist 43 (1): 49–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbring, T., and E. Treischl. 2015. “Selection Bias in Students’ Evaluation of Teaching.” Research in Higher Education 57: 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9378-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wubbels, T., M. Brekelmans, P. J. den Brok, J. Levy, M. T. Mainhard, and J. W. F. van Tartwijk. 2012. “Let’s Make Things Better: Developments in Research on Interpersonal Relationships in Education.” In Interpersonal Relationships in Education: An Overview of Contemporary Research, edited by T. Wubbels, P. J. den Brok, J. W. F. van Tartwijk, and J Levy, 225–249, 256 p. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., and E. C. K. Cheng. 2015. “Primary Teachers’ Attitudes, Intentions and Practices Regarding Formative Assessment.” Teaching and Teacher Education45: 128–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Z., Z. Li, E. Panadero, M. Yang, L. Yang, and H. Lao. 2021. “A Systematic Review on Factors Influencing Teachers’ Intentions and Implementations regarding Formative Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 1–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1884042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar