References
- Bloxham, S., and L. Campbell. 2010. “Generating Dialogue in Assessment Feedback: Exploring the Use of Interactive Cover Sheets.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (3): 291–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003650045.
- Boud, D., R. Lawson, and D. G. Thompson. 2013. “Does Student Engagement in Self-Assessment Calibrate Their Judgement over Time?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (8): 941–956. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.769198.
- Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
- Crouch, C. H., and E. Mazur. 2001. “Peer Instruction: Ten Years of Experience and Results.” American Journal of Physics 69 (9): 970–977. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249.
- Denny, P., A. Luxton-Reilly, and J. Hamer. 2008. “The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Australasian computing education – Volume 78, 69–74. Wollongong, NSW, Australia: Australian Computer Society, Inc.
- Esterhazy, R., and C. Damşa. 2019. “Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making of Feedback Comments.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (2): 260–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.
- Fellenz, M. R. 2004. “Using Assessment to Support Higher Level Learning: The Multiple Choice Item Development Assignment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (6): 703–719. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000227245.
- Kay, A. E., J. Hardy, and R. K. Galloway. 2018. “Learning from Peer Feedback on Student-Generated Multiple Choice Questions: Views of Introductory Physics Students.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 14 (1): 010119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010119.
- Kay, A. E., J. Hardy, and R. K. Galloway. 2020. “Student Use of PeerWise: A Multi-Institutional, Multidisciplinary Evaluation.” British Journal of Educational Technology 51 (1): 23–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12754.
- Li, H., Y. Xiong, C. V. Hunter, X. Guo, and R. Tywoniw. 2020. “Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning? A Meta-Analysis.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
- Liu, N.-F., and D. Carless. 2006. “Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (3): 279–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582.
- McQueen, H. A., C. Shields, D. J. Finnegan, J. Higham, and M. W. Simmen. 2014. “PeerWise Provides Significant Academic Benefits to Biological Science Students across Diverse Learning Tasks, but with Minimal Instructor Intervention.” Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 42 (5): 371–381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20806.
- Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
- Nicol, D. 2007. “E-Assessment by Design: Using Multiple-Choice Tests to Good Effect.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 31 (1): 53–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770601167922.
- Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602931003786559.
- Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090.
- Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
- O’Donovan, B., M. Price, and C. Rust. 2004. “Know What I Mean? Enhancing Student Understanding of Assessment Standards and Criteria.” Teaching in Higher Education 9 (3): 325–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251042000216642.
- Rust, C., M. Price, and B. O’Donovan. 2003. “Improving Students’ Learning by Developing Their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (2): 147–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301671.
- Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714.
- Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015.
- Stenalt, M. H. 2020. “Researching Student Agency in Digital Education as If the Social Aspects Matter: Students’ Experience of Participatory Dimensions of Online Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46(4): 644–658. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1798355.
- Strauss, J., and P. Corbin. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. California: Sage Publications.
- Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement: Enabling Students to Make Decisions about the Quality of Work.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
- Tai, J., B. J. Canny, T. P. Haines, and E. K. Molloy. 2016. “The Role of Peer-Assisted Learning in Building Evaluative Judgement: Opportunities in Clinical Medical Education.” Advances in Health Sciences Education 21 (3): 659–676. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9659-0.
- Thomas, D. R. 2006. “A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data.” American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748.
- To, J., and E. Panadero. 2019. “Peer Assessment Effects on the Self-Assessment Process of First-Year Undergraduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 920–932. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559.
- Usher, M., and M. Barak. 2018. “Peer Assessment in a Project-Based Engineering Course: Comparing Between on-Campus and Online Learning Environments.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 745–759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1405238.
- Walsh, J. L., B. H. L. Harris, P. Denny, and P. Smith. 2018. “Formative Student-Authored Question Bank: Perceptions, Question Quality and Association with Summative Performance.” Postgraduate Medical Journal 94 (1108): 97–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135018.
- Yucel, R., F. L. Bird, J. Young, and T. Blanksby. 2014. “The Road to Self-Assessment: Exemplar Marking before Peer Review Develops First-Year Students’ Capacity to Judge the Quality of a Scientific Report.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (8): 971–986. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.880400.
- Zhao, C.-M., and G. D. Kuh. 2004. “Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement.” Research in Higher Education 45 (2): 115–138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de.