Bifactor modelling of the psychological constructs of learner feedback literacy: conceptions of feedback, feedback trust and self-efficacy

References

• Adams, A.-M., H. Wilson, J. Money, S. Palmer-Conn, and J. Fearn. 2020. “Student Engagement with Feedback and Attainment: The Role of Academic Self-Efficacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 317–329. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1640184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 2010. “Self-Efficacy.” In I. B. Weiner & W. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836.
   Google Scholar
• Bejar, I. I. 1983. Achievement Testing: Recent Advances. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412983242.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 2015. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Gavin T. L., Elizabeth R. Peterson, and Esther S. Yao. 2016. “Student Conceptions of Feedback: Impact on Self-Regulation, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Achievement.” The British Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (4): 606–629. doi:10.1111/bjep.12126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Deborah L., and Philip H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2012. Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2009. “Trust, Distrust and Their Impact on Assessment Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (1): 79–89. doi:10.1080/02602930801895786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2013. “Trust and Its Role in Facilitating Dialogic Feedback.” In D. Boud & E. Molloy (Eds.), Feedback in Higher and Professional Education: Understanding It and Doing It Well, 90–103. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2019. “Feedback Loops and the Longer-Term: Towards Feedback Spirals.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (5): 705–714. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1531108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David, and David Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, David, Diane Salter, Min Yang, and Joy Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2021. “Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, B. R. 2007. “Is It Worth the Effort? How Feedback Influences Students’ Subsequent Submission of Assessable Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (5): 571–581. doi:10.1080/02602930601116912.
   Google Scholar
• Cristobal, E., C. Flavián, and M. Guinalíu. 2007. “Perceived e‐Service Quality (PeSQ). Measurement Validation and Effects on Consumer Satisfaction and Web Site Loyalty.” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 17 (3): 317–340. doi:10.1108/09604520710744326.
   Google Scholar
• Dancey, C. P., and J. Reidy. 2017. Statistics without Maths for Psychology (6th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Embretson, S. E., and S. P. Reise. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. H. 1997. “Unidimensional Linear Logistic Rasch Models.” In W. J. Van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, 225–243. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (Vol. 5). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Han, Y., and Y. Xu. 2021. “Student Feedback Literacy and Engagement with Feedback: A Case Study of Chinese Undergraduate Students.” Teaching in Higher Education 26 (2): 181–196. doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1648410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., and R. O. Mueller. 2013. Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course (2nd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., T. Ryan, and M. Phillips. 2019. “The Challenges of Feedback in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (8): 1237–1252. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1599815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. t., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., G. Rodríguez-Gómez, and D. Boud. 2020. “Developing Student Competence through Peer Assessment: The Role of Feedback, Self-Regulation and Evaluative Judgement.” Higher Education 80 (1): 137–156. doi:10.1007/s10734-019-00469-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. 2006. “Data Variance Explained by Rasch Measures.” Rasch Measurement Transactions 20 (1): 1045.
   Google Scholar
• Linderbaum, B. A., and P. E. Levy. 2010. “The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS).” Journal of Management 36 (6): 1372–1405. doi:10.1177/0149206310373145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J. J., and P. H. Kulinna. 2004. “Self-Efficacy Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior: Teaching Physically Active Physical Education Classes.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 75 (3): 288–297. doi:10.1080/02701367.2004.10609161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., and B. O. Muthén. 1998–2017. Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self‐Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. 1996. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings.” Review of Educational Research 66 (4): 543–578. doi:10.2307/1170653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, E., and L. Norton. 2017. “Now That’s the Feedback I Want!’ Students’ Reactions to Feedback on Graded Work and What They Do with It.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 499–516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, M., K. Handley, and J. Millar. 2011. “Feedback: Focusing Attention on Engagement.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., T. M. Moore, and M. G. Haviland. 2010. “Bifactor Models and Rotations: Exploring the Extent to Which Multidimensional Data Yield Univocal Scale Scores.” Journal of Personality Assessment 92 (6): 544–559. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2010. “Beyond Feedback: Developing Student Capability in Complex Appraisal.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 535–550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. 1995. “Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Performance.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 7 (2): 112–137. doi:10.1080/10413209508406961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopher, D. S. 2020. A-Priori Sample Size Calculator for Structural Equation Models [Software]. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, P. 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. G. 1992. “Teachers’ Beliefs and Conceptions: A Synthesis of the Research.” In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 127–146. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• To, J., and D. Carless. 2016. “Making Productive Use of Exemplars: Peer Discussion and Teacher Guidance for Positive Transfer of Strategies.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 40 (6): 746–764. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2015.1014317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, Christopher O., Barbara A. Greene, and Robert A. Mansell. 2006. “Identification with Academics, Intrinsic/Extrinsic Motivation, and Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Cognitive Engagement.” Learning and Individual Differences 16 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2005.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, S. G., J. F. Finch, and P. J. Curran. 1995. “Structural Equation Models with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies.” In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modeling: Issues, Concepts, and Applications, 56–75. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., G. Mathlin, and R. A. Nash. 2019. “Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit.” Frontiers in Education 4 (39). doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00039.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree. 2017a. “It’d Be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree. 2017b. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., E. Pitt, and N. Robert. 2021. “Educators’ Perceptions of Responsibility-Sharing in Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 118–131. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1748569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and D. Carless. 2017. “‘Only True Friends Could Be Cruelly Honest’: Cognitive Scaffolding and Social-Affective Support in Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (7): 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and D. Carless. 2013. “The Feedback Triangle and the Enhancement of Dialogic Feedback Processes.” Teaching in Higher Education 18 (3): 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar