Are men and women really different? The effects of gender and training on peer scoring and perceptions of peer assessment

References

• Adachi, C., J. Tai, and P. Dawson. 2018. “A Framework for Designing, Implementing, Communicating and Researching Peer Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (3): 453–467. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1405913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqassab, M., J.-W. Strijbos, and S. Ufer. 2019. “Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Beliefs about Peer Feedback, Perceptions of Their Peer Feedback Message, and Emotions as Predictors of Peer Feedback Accuracy and Comprehension of the Learning Task.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 139–154. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saadi, Z. 2020. “Gender Differences in Writing.” Cogent Education 7 (1): 1770923. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2020.1770923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryadoust, V. 2016. “Gender and Academic Major Bias in Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations.” Language Assessment Quarterly 13 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/15434303.2015.1133626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., K. Hughes, and A. Mylonas. 2002. “Developing Procedures for Implementing Peer Assessment in Large Classes Using an Action Research Process.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 427–441. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009302.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Blanca, María. J., Rafael Alarcón, Jaume Arnau, Roser Bono, and Rebecca Bendayan. 2017. “Non-Normal Data.” Psicothema 29 (4): 552–557. doi:10.7334/psicothema2016.383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and H. Holmes. 1995. “Self and Peer Marking in a Large Technical Subject.” In Enhancing Learning through Self-Assessment, edited by D. Boud, 63–78. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, K.-H, and H.-T. Hou. 2015. “Exploring Students’ Behavioural Patterns during Online Peer Assessment from the Affective, Cognitive, and Metacognitive Perspectives.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 24 (2): 171–188. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.822416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K, and C. D. Schunn. 2007. “Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline.” Computers & Education 48 (3): 409–426. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203771587.
   Google Scholar
• De Grez, M., M. Valcke, and L. Berings. 2010. “Peer Assessment of Oral Presentation Skills.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2): 1776–1780. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.983.
   Google Scholar
• Double, K. S., J. A. McGrane, and T. N. Hopfenbeck. 2020. “The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance.” Educational Psychology Review 32 (2): 481–509. doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, L., K. Karadi, S. Hershberger, E. Field, S. Wersinger, S. Pellis, D. Geary, C. Palmer, K. Hoyenga, and A. Hetsroni. 2008. Sex Differences: Summarizing more than a century of scientific research. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Espey, M. 2022. “Gender and Peer Evaluations.” The Journal of Economic Education 53 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/00220485.2021.2004277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement. https://www.routledge.com/Improving-Assessment-through-Student-Involvement-Practical-Solutions-for/Falchikov/p/book/9780415308212
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N, and J. Goldfinch. 2000. “Student Peer Assessment in Higher Education.” Review of Educational Research 70 (3): 287–322. doi:10.3102/00346543070003287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N, and D. Magin. 1997. “Detecting Gender Bias in Peer Marking of Students’ Group Process Work.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 22 (4): 385–396. doi:10.1080/0260293970220403.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A.-G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M, and J. McKenzie. 2002. “SPARK, a Confidential Web–Based Template for Self and Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork.” British Journal of Educational Technology 33 (5): 551–569. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, S. J., D. M. Fergusson, and L. J. Horwood. 2008. “Gender Differences in Educational Achievement to Age 25.” Australian Journal of Education 52 (1): 63–80. doi:10.1177/000494410805200105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallgren, K. A. 2012. “Computing Inter-Rater Reliability for Observational Data.” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8 (1): 23–34. 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanrahan, S. J, and G. Isaacs. 2001. “Assessing Self- and Peer-Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 20 (1): 53–70. doi:10.1080/07294360123776.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D. B., R. M. Felder, and H. Fuller. 2000. “Accounting for Individual Effort in Cooperative Learning Teams.” Journal of Engineering Education 89 (2): 133–140. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2000.tb00507.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, S. 2013. “Improving Engagement: The Use of ‘Authentic Self-and Peer-Assessment for Learning’ to Enhance the Student Learning Experience.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (7): 875–891. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.751963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilickaya, F. 2017. “Peer Assessment of Group Members in Tertiary Contexts.” In Innovations in Languages for Specific Purposes—Present Challenges and Future Promises, edited by M. Sowa and J. Krajka, 329–343. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M, and J. Ryu. 2013. “The Development and Implementation of a Web-Based Formative Peer Assessment System for Enhancing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness and Performance in Ill-Structured Tasks.” Educational Technology Research and Development 61 (4): 549–561. doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9266-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, R. 2010. “A Peer Review Training Workshop.” TESL Canada Journal 27 (2): 114–114. doi:10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.
   Google Scholar
• Langan, A. M., D. M. Shuker, W. R. Cullen, D. Penney, R. F. Preziosi, and C. P. Wheater. 2008. “Relationships between Student Characteristics and Self-, Peer and Tutor Evaluations of Oral Presentations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 179–190. doi:10.1080/02602930701292498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan, A. M., C. P. Wheater, E. M. Shaw, B. J. Haines, W. R. Cullen, J. C. Boyle, D. Penney, et al. 2005. “Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations: Effects of Student Gender, University Affiliation and Participation in the Development of Assessment Criteria.” Peer Assessment of Oral Presentations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (1): 21–34. doi:10.1080/0260293042003243878.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, C. V. Hunter, X. Guo, and R. Tywoniw. 2020. “Does Peer Assessment Promote Student Learning?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 193–211. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Y. Xiong, X. Zang, M. L. Kornhaber, Y. Lyu, K. S. Chung, and H. K. Suen. 2016. “Peer Assessment in the Digital Age.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 245–264. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.999746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L. 2017. “The Role of Anonymity in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (4): 645–656. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1174766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., L. Li, and Z. Zhang. 2018. “Small Group Discussion as a Key Component in Online Assessment Training for Enhanced Student Learning in Web-Based Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (2): 207–222. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1324018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magin, D. 2001. “Reciprocity as a Source of Bias in Multiple Peer Assessment of Group Work.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (1): 53–63. doi:10.1080/03075070020030715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. J. 2003. “The Effect of Scoring Criteria Specificity on Peer and Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (4): 383–394. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066218.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H.-T. 2005. “Training Students to Become Successful Peer Reviewers.” System 33 (2): 293–308. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Min, H.-T. 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, K. R., B. Myors, and A. Wolach. 2014. Statistical Power Analysis: A simple general model for traditional and modern hypothesis tests (4th ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315773155.
   Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., S. K. Banihashem, N. Taghizadeh Kerman, M. Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M. Babayi, H. Ashrafi, and H. J. A. Biemans. 2022. “Gender Differences in Students’ Argumentative Essay Writing, Peer Review Performance and Uptake in Online Learning Environments.” Interactive Learning Environments 1–15. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2034887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E. 2016. “Is It Safe? Social, Interpersonal, and Human Effects of Peer Assessment.” In Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment, edited by G. T. L. Brow and L. R. Harris, 247–266. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., A. Jonsson, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2016. “Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment.” In Assessment for Learning, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal, 311–326. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18.
   Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., M. Romero, and J.-W. Strijbos. 2013. “The Impact of a Rubric and Friendship on Peer Assessment.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 39 (4): 195–203. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinholz, D. 2016. “The Assessment Cycle: A Model for Learning through Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (2): 301–315. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1008982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., C. Scheiber, D. B. Hajovsky, B. Schwartz, and A. S. Kaufman. 2015. “Gender Differences in Academic Achievement.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology 176 (3–4): 211–234. 10.1080/00221325.2015.1036833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotsaert, T., E. Panadero, E. Estrada, and T. Schellens. 2017. “How Do Students Perceive the Educational Value of Peer Assessment in Relation to Its Social Nature?” Studies in Educational Evaluation 53: 29–40. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasmaz Oren, F. 2012. “The Effects of Gender and Previous Experience on the Approach of Self and Peer Assessment.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (2): 123–133. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.677598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senden, M., D. De Jaeger, and L. Coertens. 2022. Can Students Feel Safe and Confident during Peer Feedback? Paper Presented at the EARLI SIG1 + 4 Conference, Cadiz, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer. 2002. “Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 443–454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311.
   Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D., S. Brand-Gruwel, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and R. L. Martens. 2004. “Training Teachers in Peer-Assessment Skills.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 41 (1): 59–78. doi:10.1080/1470329032000172720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suñol, J. J., G. Arbat, J. Pujol, L. Feliu, R. M. Fraguell, and A. Planas-Lladó. 2016. “Peer and Self-Assessment Applied to Oral Presentations from a Multidisciplinary Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (4): 622–637. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1037720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, S. A, and K. Grace-Martin. 2011. Data Analysis with SPSS: A first course in applied statistics. Boston, MA: Perason Education.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, P. Dawson, and E. Panadero. 2018. “Developing Evaluative Judgement.” Higher Education 76 (3): 467–481. doi:10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To, J, and E. Panadero. 2019. “Peer Assessment Effects on the Self-Assessment Process of First-Year Undergraduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (6): 920–932. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1548559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. 2010. “Methodological Quandaries in Studying Process and Outcomes in Peer Assessment.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 339–343. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., E. F. Smith, I. Swanson, and A. Elliot. 2000. “Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing between Postgraduate Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/713611428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Guijarro, S, and M. Bengoechea. 2017. “Gender Differential in Self-Assessment.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (5): 1072–1084. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1264372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. 2014. “Sex Does Not Matter: Gender Bias and Gender Differences in Peer Assessments of Contributions to Group Work.” Sex Does Not Matter. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (3): 293–309. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.830282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip, N. A. E., M. S. R. Segers, and H. H. Tillema. 2009. “Peer Assessment for Learning from a Social Perspective.” Educational Research Review 4 (1): 41–54. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zundert, M., D. Sluijsmans, and J. van Merriënboer. 2010. “Effective Peer Assessment Processes.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L, and C.-C. Tsai. 2006. “University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes toward (Online) Peer Assessment.” Higher Education 51 (1): 27–44. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, M. L, and C.-C. Tsai. 2008. “Online Peer Assessment in an Inservice Science and Mathematics Teacher Education Course.” Teaching in Higher Education 13 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1080/13562510701794050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yurdabakan, I. 2011. “The Investigation of Peer Assessment in Primary School Cooperative Learning Groups with Respect to Gender.” Education 3-13 39 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/03004270903313608.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, F., C. Schunn, W. Li, and M. Long. 2020. “Changes in the Reliability and Validity of Peer Assessment across the College Years.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (8): 1073–1087. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1724260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Y., C. D. Schunn, Y. Wang, and F. Zhang. 2018. “Student Attitudes That Predict Participation in Peer Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (5): 800–811. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1409872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar