Program-level assessment planning in Australia: the considerations and practices of university academics

References

• Australian Government. 2019. Performance-Based Funding for the Commonwealth Grant Scheme (https://www.dese.gov.au/higher-education-reviews-and-consultations/resources/final-report-performance-based-funding-commonwealth-grant-scheme).
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J.-A., D. Andrich, T. N. Hopfenbeck, and G. Stobart. 2017. “Assessment and Learning: Fields Apart?” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 24 (3): 317–350. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. C. 2004. “A Research-Based Approach to Generic Graduate Attributes Policy.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 261–275. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235391.
   Google Scholar
• Bearman, M., P. Dawson, S. Bennett, M. Hall, E. Molloy, D. Boud, and G. Joughin. 2017. “How University Teachers Design Assessments: A Cross-Disciplinary Study.” Higher Education 74 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P, and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education: principles, Policy & Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P, and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D, and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. 1990. “Assessment and the Promotion of Academic Values.” Studies in Higher Education 15 (1): 101–111. doi:10.1080/03075079012331377621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgstock, R. S. 2009. “The Graduate Attributes We’ve Overlooked: Enhancing Graduate Employability through Career Management Skills.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1080/07294360802444347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. 2014. “Critical Approaches to Qualitative Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by P. Leavy, 116–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2015. Excellence in University Assessment. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, N., K. Weir, and R. Newsham-West. 2022. “Assessment Planning at the Program-Level: A Higher Education Policy Review in Australia.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2061911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M, and A. L. Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research: techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 4th ed. California: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, J., C. P. Van der Vleuten, and L. W. Schuwirth. 2010. “A New Framework for Designing Programmes of Assessment.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 15 (3): 379–393. 10.1007/s10459-009-9205-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva, K. W., G. Bordage, C. Campbell, R. Galbraith, S. Ginsburg, E. Holmboe, and G. Regehr. 2016. “Towards a Program of Assessment for Health Professionals: From Training into Practice.” Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice 21 (4): 897–913. 10.1007/s10459-015-9653-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes, E. L, and M. A. Flores. 2022. “Assessment in Higher Education: Voices of Programme Directors.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (1): 45–60. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1888869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G, and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. California: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S, and E. Smith. 2022. “Who Are Faculty Assessment Leaders?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (6): 928–941. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1983518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, S., P. Ayriss, and A. McCubbin. 2021. “Style or Substance: How Australian Universities Contextualise Their Graduate Attributes for the Curriculum Quality Space.” Higher Education Research & Development 40 (3): 508–523. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1761304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, P, and R. Whitfield. 2012. Programme Assessment Strategies (PASS) Final Report. https://www.brad.ac.uk/pass/about/PASS_evaluation_final_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hoda, R, and J. Noble. 2017. “Becoming Agile a Grounded Theory of Agile Transitions in Practice.” IEEE/ACM 39th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE).
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S., G. Rodríguez-Gómez, and D. Boud. 2021. “The Quality of Assessment Tasks as a Determinant of Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (6): 943–955. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1828268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. T, and R. Casidy. 2018. “Authentic Assessment in Business Education: Its Effects on Student Satisfaction and Promoting Behaviour.” Studies in Higher Education 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, T, and C. Tomas. 2017. “The Implications of Programme Assessment Patterns for Student Learning.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (6): 990–999. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1217501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. 2012. “Program Assessment Not in My Backyard.” American Journal of Business Education 5 (6): 705–708.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. 2015. Curriculum design for assuring learning—leading the way -final report. http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-curriculum-design-assuring-learning-leading-way-2015
   Google Scholar
• Lizzio, A, and K. Wilson. 2013. “First-Year Students’ Appraisal of Assessment Tasks: Implications for Efficacy, Engagement and Performance.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38 (4): 389–406. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.637156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, T, and B. de la Harpe. 2020. “The State of Play of Associate Deans, Learning and Teaching, in Australian Universities, 30 Years on.” Higher Education Research & Development 39 (3): 532–545. doi:10.1080/07294360.2019.1685944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masters, G., N. 2014. Assessment: Getting to the essence. A. C. f. E. Research. http://rd.acer.edu.au/article/getting-to-the-essence-of-assessment
   Google Scholar
• Medland, E. 2016. “Assessment in Higher Education: Drivers, Barriers and Directions for Change in the UK.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.982072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderifar, M., H. Goli, and F. Ghaljaie. 2017. “Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research.” Strides in Development of Medical Education 14 (3) doi:10.5812/sdme.67670.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J, and D. Beckett. 2010. Educational Research: creative Thinking & Doing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Panigrahi, J., B. Das, and S. Tripathy. 2015. “Paving the Path from Education to Employment.” Parikalpana: KIIT Journal of Management 11 (1): 113–119. doi:10.23862/kiit-parikalpana/2015/v11/i1/133121.
   Google Scholar
• Simper, N., K. Mårtensson, A. Berry, and N. Maynard. 2022. “Assessment Cultures in Higher Education: Reducing Barriers and Enabling Change.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (7): 1016–1029. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1983770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sproule, W. 2010. “Content Anaysis.” In Social Research Methods, edited by M. Walter. 2nd ed. 323–350. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, J. S., M. A. Lowther, S. Sharp, and G. L. Arnold. 1997. “Program-Level Curriculum Planning: An Exploration of Faculty Perspectives on Two Different Campuses.” Research in Higher Education 38 (1): 99–130. doi:10.1023/A:1024952829701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas, C, and T. Jessop. 2019. “Struggling and Juggling: A Comparison of Student Assessment Loads across Research and Teaching-Intensive Universities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranter, B. 2010. “Sampling.” In Social Research Methods an Australian Perspective, edited by M. Walter. 2nd ed. 123–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., L. W. T. Schuwirth, E. W. Driessen, J. Dijkstra, D. Tigelaar, L. K. Baartman, and J. van Tartwijk. 2012. “A Model for Programmatic Assessment Fit for Purpose.” Medical Teacher 34 (3): 205–214. 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Vleuten, C. P. M., S. Heeneman, and S. Schut. 2020. “Programmatic Assessment: An Avenue to a Different Assessment Culture.” In Assessment in Health Professions Education, edited by R. Yudkowsky, Y.-S. Park, & D. S. M. 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.4324/9781315166902-16.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, N, and T. Harland. 2019. “Graduate Attributes Frameworks or Powerful Knowledge?” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 41 (4): 361–374. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2019.1613310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, K. 2020. “Understanding Rubrics.” In Facilitating Student Learning and Engagement in Higher Education through Assessment Rubrics, edited by Peter Grainger & Katie Weir. 9–23. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, R, and P. Hartley. 2019. Assessment Strategy: Enhancement of Student Learning through a Programme Focus (Employability via Higher Education: Sustainability as Scholarship). 237–253. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3_16.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, K. 2010. “Analysing Qualitative Data .” In Social Research Methods, edited by M. Walters. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, J. Rowntree, and M. Parker. 2017. “It’d Be Useful, but I Wouldn’t Use It’: Barriers to University Students’ Feedback Seeking and Recipience.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (11): 2026–2041. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar