A practical approach to overcoming biases in comparing student performance in higher education

References

• Adelfio, G., and G. Boscaino. 2016. “Degree Course Change and Student Performance: A Mixed-Effect Model Approach.” Journal of Applied Statistics 43 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1080/02664763.2015.1018673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelfio, G., G. Boscaino, and V. Capursi. 2014. “A New Indicator for Higher Education Student Performance.” Higher Education 68 (5): 653–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. R., D. J. Sweeney, T. A. Williams, J. D. Camm, and J. J. Cochran. 2014. Statistics for Business and Economics. 12th ed. Cengage Learning, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, P. H., B. Bourdillon, D. Collymore, A. Cooper, W. Fox, C. Haines, D. Turner, H. Woolf, and M. Yorke. 1999. “Discipline-Related Marking Behaviour Using Percentages: A Potential Cause Inequity in Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24 (3): 285–300. doi:10.1080/0260293990240303.
   Google Scholar
• Bridges, P., A. Cooper, P. Evanson, C. Haines, D. Jenkins, D. Scurry, H. Woolf, and M. Yorke. 2002. “Coursework Marks High, Examination Marks Low: Discuss.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (1): 35–48. doi:10.1080/02602930120105045.
   Google Scholar
• Bygren, M. 2020. “Biased Grades? Changes in Grading after a Blinding of Examinations Reform.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (2): 292–303. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1638885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. ECTS Users’ Guide. http://ec.europa.eu/education/ects/users-guide/index_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. 2015. “The European Higher Education Area in 2015: Bologna Process. Implementation Report.” Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/sites/eacea-site/files/european_higher_education_area_bologna_process_implementation_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federiakin, D., O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, E. Kardanova, C. Kühling-Thees, J. Reichert-Schlax, and Y. Koreshnikova. 2022. “Cross-National Structure of Economic Competence.” Research in Comparative and International Education 17 (2): 225–245. doi:10.1177/17454999211061243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey, USA
   Google Scholar
• Haug, G. 1997. “Capturing the Message Conveyed by Grades: Interpreting Foreign Grades.” World Education News and Reviews 10 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Hornby, W. 2003. “Assessing Using Grade-Related Criteria: A Single Currency for Universities.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28 (4): 435–454. doi:10.1080/0260293032000066254.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, V. E. 1997. “An Alternative to Traditional GPA for Evaluating Student Performance.” Statistical Science 12 (4): 251–269. doi:10.1214/ss/1030037959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karran, T. 2005. “Pan-European Grading Scales: Lessons from National Systems and the ECTS.” Higher Education in Europe 30 (1): 5–22. doi:10.1080/03797720500087949.
   Google Scholar
• Larkey, P. D. 1997. “An Alternative to Traditional GPA for Evaluating Student Performance: Comment: Adjusting Grades at Duke University.” Statistical Science 12 (4): 269–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieponiene, J., and R. Kulvietiene. 2011. “The Grades Transfer from One Grading Scale to Other Algorithmization.” Informatics in Education 10 (2): 233–244. doi:10.15388/infedu.2011.16.
   Google Scholar
• Linse, A. R. 2017. “Interpreting and Using Student Ratings Data: Guidance for Faculty Serving as Administrators and on Evaluation Committees.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 54: 94–106. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcham, C. L., A. M. Ade, P. Clark, and J. Marion. 2020. “Bias and Trends in Student Evaluations in Online Higher Education Settings.” Collegiate Aviation Review International 38 (2): 34–50. doi:http://ojs.library.okstate.edu/osu/index.php/CARI/article/view/8036/7417.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, K., T. Schank, and K. Wälde. 2019. “Ranking (Average Marks of) Students.” Gutenberg School of Management and Economics & Research Unit “Interdisciplinary Public Policy,” Discussion Paper 1907, Mainz.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, H. P., R. P. Maia, E. A. Lima Neto, and M. Rodrigues-Motta. 2019. “Zero-One Augmented Beta and Zero-Inflated Discrete Models with Heterogeneous Dispersion for the Analysis of Student Academic Performance.” Statistical Methods & Applications 28 (4): 749–767. doi:10.1007/s10260-019-00455-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2005. “Interpretations of Criteria-Based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 175–194. doi:10.1080/0260293042000264262.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, and J. P. Mariño. 2018. “Performance Indicators of Learning in Higher Education Institutions: An Overview of the Field.” Social and Political Science: 249–263. doi:10.4337/9781785369759.00029.
   Google Scholar
• Soh, K. C. 2010. “Grade Point Average: What’s Wrong and What’s the Alternative?” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 33 (1): 27–36. doi:10.1080/1360080X.2011.537009.
   Google Scholar
• Wackerly, D., W. Mendenhall, and R. L. Scheaffer. 2008. Mathematical Statistics with Applications. 7th ed. Cengage Learning, Stamford, Connecticut, USA
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M., G. Barnett, P. Bridges, P. Evanson, C. Haines, D. Jenkins, P. Knight, D. Scurry, M. Stowell, and H. Woolf. 2002. “Does Grading Method Influence Honours Degree Classification?” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (3): 269–279. doi:10.1080/02602930220138624.
   Google Scholar
• Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., R. J. Shavelson, and H. A. Pant. 2018. “Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Higher Education. International Comparisons and Perspectives.” In Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation in Higher Education, edited by C. Secolsky and D. B. Denison, 2nd ed., Chap. 45, 686–698. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar