4,041
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Shifting feedback agency to students by having them write their own feedback comments

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allal, L. 2016. “The Co-Regulation of Student Learning in an Assessment for Learning Culture.” In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation, edited by D. Laveault and L. Allal. Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_15.
  • Allal, L. 2020. “Assessment and the co-Regulation of Learning in the Classroom.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 27 (4): 332–349. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1609411.
  • Berg, S. A., and S. Moon. 2022. “Prompting Hypothetical Social Comparisons to Support Chemistry Students’ Data Analysis and Interpretations.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23 (1): 124–136. doi:10.1039/D1RP00213A.
  • Boud, D., and E. Molloy. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
  • Butler, D. L., and P. H. Winne. 1995. “Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis.” Review of Educational Research 65 (3): 245–281. doi:10.3102/00346543065003245.
  • Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
  • Carless, D., D. Salter, M. Yang, and J. Lam. 2011. “Developing Sustainable Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 395–407. doi:10.1080/03075071003642449.
  • Dawson, P., Zi Yan, A. Lipnevich, J. Tai, D. Boud, and P. Mahoney. 2023. “Measuring What Learners Do in Feedback: The Feedback Literacy Behaviour Scale.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2240983.
  • de Kleijn, R. A. M. 2023. “Supporting Student and Teacher Feedback Literacy: An Instructional Model for Student Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 186–200. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1967283.
  • Denzin, N. K. 2001. Interpretive Interactionism. 2nd ed. SAGE
  • Gentner, D., and F. Maravilla. 2017. “Analogical Reasoning.” In International Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, edited by L. J. Ball and V. A. Thomson, 186–203. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Gravett, K. 2022. “Feedback Literacies as Sociomaterial Practice.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (2): 261–274. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1747099.
  • Greenbank, P., and C. Penketh. 2009. “Student Autonomy and Reflections on Researching and Writing the Undergraduate Dissertation.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 33 (4): 463–472. doi:10.1080/03098770903272537.
  • Han, Y., and Y. Xu. 2020. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: The Influences of Teacher Feedback on Peer Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (5): 680–696. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545.
  • Handley, K., and L. Williams. 2011. “From Copying to Learning: Using Exemplars to Engage Students with Assessment Criteria and Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (1): 95–108. doi:10.1080/02602930903201669.
  • Hart, C. 2018. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination.” London: Sage.
  • Heron, M. H., E. Medland, N. Winstone, and E. Pitt. 2023. “Developing the Relational in Teacher Feedback Literacy: Exploring Feedback Talk.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 172–185. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1932735.
  • Hill, J., and H. West. 2020. “Improving the Student Learning Experience through Dialogic Feed-Forward Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (1): 82–97. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908.
  • Hoo, H. T., C. Deneen, and D. Boud. 2022. “Developing Student Feedback Literacy through Self and Peer Assessment Interventions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (3): 444–457. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1925871.
  • Hui, L., K. Ippolito., M. Sarsfield., M. Charalambous. 2023. “Using a self-reflective ePortfolio and feedback dialogue to understand and address problematic feedback expectations.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2232960
  • Jensen, L. X., M. Bearman, and D. Boud. 2023. “Feedback Encounters: Towards a Framework for Analysing and Understanding Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (1): 121–134. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2059446.
  • Kaufman, J. H., and C. D. Schunn. 2011. “Students’ Perceptions about Peer Assessment for Writing: Their Origin and Impact on Revision Work.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 387–406. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6.
  • Klein, P. D., and D. van Dijk. 2019. “Writing as a Learning Activity.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognition and Education, edited by J. Dunlosky and K. A. Rawson, 266–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108235631.012.
  • Lipnevich, A. A., L. N. McCallen, K. P. Miles, and J. K. Smith. 2014. “Mind the Gap! Students’ Use of Exemplars and Detailed Rubrics as Formative Assessment.” Instructional Science 42 (4): 539–559. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9.
  • Little, T., P. Dawson, D. Boud, and J. Tai. 2023. “Can Students’ Feedback Literacy Be Improved? A Scoping Review of Interventions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2177613.
  • Maier, H. R. 2013. “What Constitutes a Good Literature Review and Why Does Its Quality Matter?” Environmental Modelling & Software 43: 3–4. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.02.004.
  • Malcolm, M. 2023. “The Challenge of Achieving Transparency in Undergraduate Honours-Level Dissertation Supervision.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 101–117. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1776246.
  • Malecka, B., R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and J. Tai. 2022. “An Empirical Study of Student Action from Ipsative Design of Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (5): 801–815. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1968338.
  • Malecka, B., D. Boud, and D. Carless. 2022. “Eliciting, Processing and Enacting Feedback: Mechanisms for Embedding Student Feedback Literacy within the Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 27 (7): 908–922. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784.
  • Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
  • Nicol, D. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi:10.1080/02602931003786559.
  • Nicol, D. 2019. “Reconceptualising Feedback as an Internal Not an External Process.” Italian Journal of Educational Research Special Issue : 71–83. https://ojs.pensamultimedia.it/index.php/sird/article/view/3270.
  • Nicol, D. 2021. “The Power of Internal Feedback: Exploiting Natural Comparison Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (5): 756–778. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314.
  • Nicol, D. 2022. Turning Active Learning into Active Feedback. Introductory Guide from Active Feedback Toolkit, Adam Smith Business School, National Teaching Repository. doi:10.25416/NTR.19929290.
  • Nicol, D. J., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
  • Nicol, D., and S. McCallum. 2022. “Making Internal Feedback Explicit: Exploiting the Multiple Comparisons That Occur during Peer Review.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (3): 424–443. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620.
  • Nicol, D., and G. Selvaretnam. 2022. “Making Internal Feedback Explicit: Harnessing the Comparisons Students Make during Two-Stage Exams.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (4): 507–522. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1934653.
  • Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
  • O’Connor, Anne, and Arlene McCurtin. 2021. “A Feedback Journey: Employing a Constructivist Approach to the Development of Feedback Literacy among Health Professional Learners.” BMC Medical Education 21 (1): 413–486. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02914-2.
  • Orsmond, P., and S. Merry. 2013. “The Importance of Self-Assessment in Students’ Use of Tutors’ Feedback: A Qualitative Study of High and Non-High Achieving Biology Undergraduates.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 737–753. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.697868.
  • Panadero, E., A. Lipnevich, and J. Broadbent. 2019. “Turning Self-Assessment into Self-Feedback.” In The Impact of Feedback in Higher Education, edited by M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, and E. Molloy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_9.
  • Roberts, L. D., and K. Seaman. 2018. “Good Undergraduate Dissertation Supervision: Perspectives of Supervisors and Dissertation Coordinators.” International Journal for Academic Development 23 (1): 28–40. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412971.
  • Rovagnati, V., E. Pitt, and N. Winstone. 2022. “Feedback Cultures, Histories and Literacies: International Postgraduate Students’ Experiences.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (3): 347–359. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1916431.
  • Sambell, K., and L. Graham. 2020. “We Need to Change What We’re Doing.” Using Pedagogic Action Research to Improve Teacher Management of Exemplars.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 13 (2): 3–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1267730.pdf.
  • Sleker, T. D. 2005. “Without 1, Where Would We Begin?: Small Sample Research in Educational Settings.” Journal of Thought 40 (1): 79–86. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589814.
  • Smyth, P., and D. Carless. 2021. “Theorising How Teachers Manage the Use of Exemplars: Towards Mediated Learning from Exemplars.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (3): 393–406. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1781785.
  • Steen-Utheim, Anna, and Anne Line Wittek. 2017. “Dialogic Feedback and Potentialities for Student Learning.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 15: 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.06.002.
  • Sutton, P. 2012. “Conceptualizing Feedback Literacy: Knowing, Being, and Acting.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781.
  • Tai, J., M. Bearman, K. Gravett, and E. Molloy. 2023. “Exploring the Notion of Teacher Feedback Literacies through the Theory of Practice Architectures.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 201–213. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967.
  • Tam, A. C. F. 2021. “Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of and Responses to Exemplar-Based Dialogic Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (2): 269–285. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1772957.
  • Tomazin, L., A. Lipnevich, and C. Lopera-Oquendo. 2023. “Teacher Feedback vs. annotated Exemplars: Examining the Effects on Middle School Students’ Writing Performance.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 78: 101262. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101262.
  • Van der Kleij, F. M., L. E. Adie, and J. J. Cumming. 2019. “A Meta-Review of the Student Role in Feedback.” International Journal of Educational Research 98: 303–323. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.09.005.
  • Winstone, N. E., G. Mathlin, and R. A. Nash. 2019. “Building Feedback Literacy: Students’ Perceptions of the Developing Engagement with Feedback Toolkit.” Frontiers in Education 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00039.
  • Wood, J. 2021. “A Dialogic Technology-Mediated Model of Feedback Uptake and Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (8): 1173–1190. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174.
  • Wood, J. 2022. “Supporting the Uptake Process with Dialogic Peer Screencast Feedback: A Sociomaterial Perspective.” Teaching in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243.
  • Yan, Z., and G. T. L. Brown. 2017. “A Cyclical Self-Assessment Process: Towards a Model of How Students Engage in Self-Assessment.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 (8): 1247–1262. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091.