L2 writing teachers’ feedback practices for doctoral publishing: a teacher feedback literacy perspective

References

• Boud, D., and P. Dawson. 2023. “What Feedback Literate Teachers Do: An Empirically-Derived Competency Framework.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 158–171. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 328–352. doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and N. Winstone. 2023. “Teacher Feedback Literacy and Its Interplay with Student Feedback Literacy.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 150–163. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, S. W. 2021. “Reconsidering Student Feedback Literacy from an Ecological Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (1): 92–104. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1730765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and C. N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th ed. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., H. Jin, and Y. Gao. 2023. “Developing EFL Teachers’ Feedback Literacy for Research and Publication Purposes through Intra-and Inter-Disciplinary Collaborations: A Multiple-Case Study.” Assessing Writing 57: 100751. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Y. 2017. 孟子 [Mencius]. 北京 [Beijing]: 中华书局 [China Publishing House].
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., and P. Habibie. 2022. Introducing English for Research Publication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. H. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heron, M., E. Medland, N. Winstone, and E. Pitt. 2021. “Developing the Relational in Teacher Feedback Literacy: Exploring Feedback Talk.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 172–185. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1932735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A., K. Hyland, and R. M. Manchón. 2016. “Dimensions in L2 Writing Theory and Research: Learning to Write and Writing to Learn.” In Handbook of Second and Foreign Language Writing, edited by R. M. Manchón, P. K. Matsuda, pp. 45–64. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2020. “Second Language Writing Teacher Education and Feedback Literacy Development: Perspectives from Hong Kong.” In Second Language Writing Instruction in Global Contexts: English Language Teacher Preparation and Development, edited by L. Seloni & S. Lee, 50–70. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I. 2021. “The Development of Feedback Literacy for Writing Teachers.” TESOL Quarterly 55 (3): 1048–1059. doi:10.1002/tesq.3012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I., M. Karaca, and S. Inan. 2023. “The Development and Validation of a Scale on L2 Writing Teacher Feedback Literacy.” Assessing Writing 57: 100743. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and J. Flowerdew. 2020. “Teaching English for Research Publication Purposes (ERPP): A Review of Language Teachers’ Pedagogical Initiatives.” English for Specific Purposes 59: 29–41. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2020.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Molloy, E., D. Boud, and M. Henderson. 2020. “Developing a Learning-Centred Framework for Feedback Literacy.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 (4): 527–540. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambell, K., and L. Graham. 2020. “We Need to Change What We’re Doing.” Using Pedagogic Action Research to Improve Teacher Management of Exemplars.” Practitioner Research in Higher Education 13 (1): 3–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. 2001. “Attention.” In Cognition and Second Language Instruction, edite dby P. Robinson, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, J., M. Bearman, K. Gravett, and E. Molloy. 2023. “Exploring the Notion of Teacher Feedback Literacies through the Theory of Practice Architectures.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 201–213. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1948967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Popta, E., M. Kral, G. Camp, R. L. Martens, and P. R. J. Simons. 2017. “Exploring the Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning for the Provider.” Educational Research Review 20: 24–34. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., K. Balloo, and D. Carless. 2022. “Discipline-Specific Feedback Literacies: A Framework for Curriculum Design.” Higher Education 83 (1): 57–77. doi:10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P., S. Yu, and Y. Luo. 2023. “The Development of Teacher Feedback Literacy in Situ: EFL Writing Teachers’ Endeavor to Human-computer-AWE Integral Feedback Innovation.” Assessing Writing 57: 100739. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and T. Zhang. 2022. “Engaging with Multiple Sources of Feedback in Academic Writing: Postgraduate Students’ Perspectives.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (7): 995–1008. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., L. S. Teng, and J. Cai. 2021. “Feedback Engagement of Chinese International Doctoral Students.” Studies in Continuing Education 43 (1): 119–135. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2020.1718634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. V., and K. Hyland. 2018. “Student Engagement with Teacher and Automated Feedback on L2 Writing.” Assessing Writing 36: 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar