Peer feedback that consistently supports learning to write and read: providing comments on meaning-level issues

References

• Allen, D., and A. Mills. 2016. “The Impact of Second Language Proficiency in Dyadic Peer Feedback.” Language Teaching Research 20 (4): 498–513. doi:10.1177/1362168814561902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saadi, Z. T., and D. Galbraith. 2021. “Does the Revision Process Differ across the Language of Writing (L1 vs. FL), FL Language Proficiency, and Gender? An Empirical Study Using Keystroke Logging Data.” Writing and Pedagogy 12 (1): 73–109. doi:10.1558/wap.38067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, E. C. 1999. “The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 215–241. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80115-5.
   Google Scholar
• Berggren, J. 2015. “Learning from Giving Feedback: A Study of Secondary-Level Students.” ELT Journal 69 (1): 58–70. doi:10.1093/elt/ccu036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, G., X. Wang, and L. Wang. 2023. “Developing Assessment Literacy among Trainee Translators: Scaffolding Self and Peer Assessment as an Intervention.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (6): 888–902. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2142515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., and C. MacArthur. 2011. “Learning by Reviewing.” Journal of Educational Psychology 103 (1): 73–84. doi:10.1037/a0021950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. H., and K. Cho. 2011. “Peer Reviewers Learn from Giving Comments.” Instructional Science 39 (5): 629–643. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., C. D. Schunn, and X. Gai. 2022. “Peer Feedback and Teacher Feedback: A Comparative Study of Revision Effectiveness in Writing Instruction for EFL Learners.” Higher Education Research & Development 41 (6): 1838–1854. doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., C. D. Schunn, X. Gai, Y. Jiang, and Z. Wang. 2021. “Effects of Trained Peer vs. teacher Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing Performance, Self-Efficacy, and Internalization of Motivation.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 788474. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennen, V. P., and K. J. Burner. 2008. “The Cognitive Apprenticeship Model in Educational Practice.” In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 425–439. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Z., Y. Gao, and C. D. Schunn. 2023. “Assessing Students’ Peer Feedback Literacy in Writing:Scale Development and Validation.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (8): 1103–1118. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2175781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faigley, L., and S. Witte. 1981. “Analyzing Revision.” College Composition & Communication 32 (4): 400–414. doi:10.58680/ccc198115887.
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, D. R. 2003. Response to Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Q. An, and C. D. Schunn. 2023. “The Bilateral Benefits of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback in Academic Writing across Varying L2 Proficiency.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 77: 101252. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W. 2023. “Enhancing ESL Learner’s Literacy by Peer-Assisted Learning Strategy of Online English News.” Frontiers in Psychology 14: 1172099. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., X. Liu, A. Aitken, C. Ng, B. Bartlett, K. R. Harris, and J. Holzapfel. 2018. “Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis.” Reading Research Quarterly 53 (3): 279–304. doi:10.1002/rrq.194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. B. 1991. “How Many Subjects Does It Take to Do a Regression Analysis?” Multivariate Behavioral Research 26 (3): 499–510. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouhar, M. R., and W. H. Rupley. 2021. “The Reading–Writing Connection Based on Independent Reading and Writing: A Systematic Review.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 37 (2): 136–156. doi:10.1080/10573569.2020.1740632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., and F. Fischer. 2010. “Peer Assessment as Collaborative Learning: A Cognitive Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 20 (4): 344–348. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, R. 2010. “A Peer Review Training Workshop: Coaching Students to Give and Evaluate Peer Feedback.” TESL Canada Journal 27 (2): 114–127. doi:10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., and J. G. Hansen. 2002. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T. L., and Y. F. Yang. 2023. “Developing College Students’ Learning Strategies to Improve Oral Presentation through Negotiation of Meaning in Telecollaboration.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 55 (6): 1036–1060. doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2098211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., and W. Baker. 2009. “To Give is Better than to Receive: The Benefits of Peer Review to the Reviewer’s Own Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, X., W. Ren, and Y. Xie. 2021. “The Effects of Online Feedback on ESL/EFL Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 30 (6): 643–653. doi:10.1007/s40299-021-00594-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min, H. T. 2006. “The Effects of Trained Peer Review on EFL Students’ Revision Types and Writing Quality.” Journal of Second Language Writing 15 (2): 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocampo, J. C., E. Panadero, D. Zamorano, I. Sánchez-Iglesias, and F. Diez Ruiz. 2023. “The Effects of Gender and Training on Peer Feedback Characteristics.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 49 (4): 539–555. doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2286432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J. W. 2016. “Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation.” In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation, edited by D. Laveault & L. Allal, 311–326. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, T. M. 1999. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing.” Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (3): 265–289. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage, J. D., J. C. Bean, and J. Johnson. 2014. The Allyn & Bacon Guide to Writing, Brief Edition. 7th ed. London: Pearson Higher.
   Google Scholar
• Ren, H., and G. Hu. 2012. “Peer Review and Chinese EFL/ESL Student Writers.” English Australia Journal 27 (2): 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Roscoe, R. D., and M. T. H. Chi. 2007. “Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions.” Review of Educational Research 77 (4): 534–574. doi:10.3102/0034654307309920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. 2015. “The Relative Effects of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Improvement in EFL Students’ Writing Ability.” Linguistics and Education 29: 73–82. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. 2018. “The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Changes in EFL Students’ Writing Self-Efficacy.” The Language Learning Journal 46 (2): 87–102. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.958190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillings, M., H. Roebertsen, H. Savelberg, A. van Dijk, and D. Dolmans. 2021. “Improving the Understanding of Written Peer Feedback through Face-to-Face Peer Dialogue: Students’ Perspective.” Higher Education Research & Development 40 (5): 1100–1116. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R. 2019. “Are Reading and Writing Building on the Same Skills? The Relationship between Reading and Writing in L1 and EFL.” Reading and Writing 32 (3): 511–535. doi:10.1007/s11145-018-9874-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunn, Christian, Amanda Godley, and Sara DeMartino. 2016. “The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 60 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1002/jaal.525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluijsmans, D. M. A., S. Brand-Gruwel, and J. J. G. van Merriënboer. 2002. “Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education: Effects on Performance and Perceptions.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 27 (5): 443–454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311.
   Google Scholar
• Spörer, N., J. C. Brunstein, and U. L. F. Kieschke. 2009. “Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Skills: Effects of Strategy Instruction and Reciprocal Teaching.” Learning and Instruction 19 (3): 272–286. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotsky, S. 1983. “Research on Reading/Writing Relationships: A Synthesis and Suggested Directions.” Language Arts 60 (5): 627–642. doi:10.58680/la198326313.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, M. 2008. “Japanese Learners’ Self Revisions and Peer Revisions of Their Written Compositions in English.” TESOL Quarterly 42 (2): 209–233. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00116.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. 2002. “Teaching Critical Thinking in EAP Courses in Australia.” TESOL Journal 11 (4): 15–20. doi:10.1002/j.1949-3533.2002.tb00104.x.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. 1998. “Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities.” Review of Educational Research 68 (3): 249–276. doi:10.3102/00346543068003249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K., C. Buchs, D. Duran, and H. van Keer. 2017. Effective Peer Learning: From Principles to Practical Implementation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trautmann, N. M. 2006. “Is It Better to Give or to Receive?: Insights into Collaborative Learning through Web-Mediated Peer Review.” PhD diss., Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M., and M. Ng. 2000. “Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?” Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2): 147–170. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9.
   Google Scholar
• Vuogan, A., and S. Li. 2023. “Examining the Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing: A Meta-Analysis.” TESOL Quarterly 57 (4): 1115–1138. doi:10.1002/tesq.3178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and C. D. Schunn. 2020. “From Feedback to Revisions: Effects of Feedback Features and Perceptions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 60: 101826. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and C. D. Schunn. 2022. “Assessor Writing Performance on Peer Feedback: Exploring the Relation between Assessor Writing Performance, Problem Identification Accuracy, and Helpfulness of Peer Feedback.” Journal of Educational Psychology 115 (1): 118–142. doi:10.1037/edu0000768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, M. 2023. “Peer Review Circles: The Value of Working in Triadic Groups and Oral Observational Peer Feedback in the Development of Student Feedback Literacy.” Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 46 (2): 270–288. doi:10.1515/CJAL-2023-0208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Q., and C. D. Schunn. 2023. “Understanding the What and When of Peer Feedback Benefits for Performance and Transfer.” Computers in Human Behavior 147: 107857. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and I. Lee. 2016. “Exploring Chinese Students’ Strategy Use in a Cooperative Peer Feedback Writing Group.” System 58: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and C. D. Schunn. 2023. “Self-Regulation of Peer Feedback Quality Aspects through Different Dimensions of Experience within Prior Peer Feedback Assignments.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 74: 102210. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong, Z., Y. Wang, and C. D. Schunn. 2021. “Why Students Want to Provide Feedback to Their Peers: Drivers of Feedback Quantity and Variation by Type of Course.” Journal of Psychology in Africa 31 (4): 336–343. doi:10.1080/14330237.2021.1952726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar