Consideration of student evaluations of teaching (SET) and learning: perspectives of learning and teaching leaders through the ethical lens of “first, do no harm”

References

• Bennett, S. K. 1982. “Student Perceptions of and Expectations for Male and Female Instructors: Evidence Relating to the Question of Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (2): 170–179. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.74.2.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2023. “Thematic Analysis.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by K. D. Norman, S. L. Yvonna, D. G. Michael, and S. C. Gaile, 385–402. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. 2014. Association of Social Anthropologists. 2011. “Ethical Guidelines for Good Research Practice,” https://www.theasa.org/ downloads/ASA%20ethics%20guidelines%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, D., and I. Warwick. 2021. “First, Do No Harm: Using ‘Ethical Triage’ to Minimise Causing Harm When Undertaking Educational Research among Vulnerable Participants.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 45 (8): 1090–1103. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2021.1890702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, D., and B. Tucker. 2018. “A National Strategy for Teaching Excellence – One University at a Time.” In Global Perspectives on Teaching Excellence: A New Era for Higher Education, edited by C. Broughan, G. Steventon and L. Clouder, 93–105. London: Rutledge. doi:10.4324/9781315211251-7.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S., and J. McAuley. 2005. “Conceptualising Middle Management in Higher Education: A Multifaceted Discourse.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27 (1): 19–34. doi:10.1080/13600800500045786.
   Google Scholar
• Collini, S. 2012. What Are Universities for? London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Cone, C., L. M. Fox, M. Frankart, E. Kreys, D. R. Malcom, M. Mielczarek, and L. Lebovitz. 2022. “A Multicenter Study of Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching in Pharmacy Programs.” Currents in Pharmacy Teaching & Learning 14 (9): 1085–1090. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1877129722002003. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, Samuel, Melinda Laundon, Abby Cathcart, Md Abul Bashar, and Richi Nayak. 2023. “First, Do No Harm’: Automated Detection of Abusive Comments in Student Evaluation of Teaching Surveys.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (3): 377–389. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2081668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham-Nelson, S., M. Baktashmotlagh, and W. Boles. 2019. “Visualizing Student Opinions through Text Analysis.” IEEE Transactions on Education 62 (4): 305–311. doi:10.1109/TE.2019.2924385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerde, S., and M. Alvesson. 2020. “Sandwiched: Exploring Role and Identity of Middle Managers in the Genuine Middle.” Human Relations 73 (1): 124–151. doi:10.1177/0018726718823243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. A. 2018. “Approaches to Career Development and Support for Sessional Academics in Higher Education.” International Journal for Academic Development 23 (4): 312–323. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2018.1510406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. A. 2022a. “Sexism, Racism, Prejudice, and Bias: A Literature Review and Synthesis of Research Surrounding Student Evaluations of Courses and Teaching.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (1): 144–154. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1888075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. A. 2022b. Bourdieu and Higher Education: Life in the Modern University. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heffernan, T. A. 2023. “Abusive Comments in Student Evaluations of Courses and Teaching: The Attacks Women and Marginalised Academics Endure.” Higher Education 85 (1): 225–239. doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00831-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane, E. 2006. Misogyny Online: A Short (and Brutish) History. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. 2000. “The Authority of the Student Evaluation Questionnaire.” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (4): 419–434. doi:10.1080/713699176.
   Google Scholar
• Kayas, O. J., C. Assimakopoulos, and T. Hines. 2022. “Student Evaluations of Teaching: Emerging Surveillance and Resistance.” Studies in Higher Education 47 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1725875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazan, E., J. Borden, S. Johnson, and L. Greenshaw. 2019. “Examining Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching for Graduate Teaching Assistants.” NACTA Journal 64: 422–427.
   Google Scholar
• Kreitzer, R. J., and J. Sweet-Cushman. 2021. “Evaluating Student Evaluations of Teaching: A Review of Measurement and Equity Bias in SETs and Recommendations for Ethical Reform.” Journal of Academic Ethics 20 (1): 73–84. doi:10.1007/s10805-021-09400-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, K., and J. Potter. 2022. “Gender Stereotyping in Student Perceptions of Teaching Excellence: Applying the Shifting Standards Theory.” Higher Education Research & Development 41 (7): 2201–2214. doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.2014411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, S., and K. Fuentes. 2022. “It is Time to Address Ableism in Academia: A Systematic Review of the Experiences and Impact of Ableism among Faculty and Staff.” Disabilities 2 (2): 178–203. doi:10.3390/disabilities2020014.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, M., and F. Wright-Brough. 2023. “Setting out SET: A Situational Mapping of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Australian Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (6): 790–805. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2130169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maistry, S. M. 2016. “Confronting the Neo-Liberal Brute: Reflections of a Higher Education Middle-Level Manager.” South African Journal of Higher Education 26 (3): 515–528. doi:10.20853/26-3-184.
   Google Scholar
• McCormack, C. 2005. “Reconceptualizing Student Evaluation of Teaching: An Ethical Framework for Changing Times.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (5): 463–476. doi:10.1080/02602930500186925.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K.,. M. W., and J. Martin. 2018. “Gender Bias in Student Evaluations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (03): 648–652. doi:10.1017/S104909651800001X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, L. 2015. “Afterword. Blaming, Shaming and the Feminization of Social Media.” In Feminist Surveillance Studies, edited by E. D. Rachel, and M. S. Amelia. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, C. M., J. V. Carew, D. Pierce-Gonzalez, and D. Wills. 1977. “An Experiment in Racism: TV Commercials.” Education and Urban Society 10 (1): 61–87. doi:10.1177/001312457701000105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, V. 2018. “Is Gender Bias an Intended Feature of Teaching Evaluations?” Inside Higher Education. https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/ 02/09/teaching-evaluations-are-often-used-confirm-worst-stereotypes-about-women-faculty
   Google Scholar
• Rea, J. 2012. “National Tertiary Education Union Written Submission to the Independent Inquiry to Insecure Work. http://www.nteu.org.au/library/view/id/2186
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. 2023. “‘Universities Could Face Prosecution’ Over Student Evaluations: Psychosocial Harm Clauses in Workplace Safety Laws Elevate Administrators’ Mental Health Obligations, Expert Warns.” Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/universities-could-face-prosecution-over-student-evaluations
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, J. 2012. “Accountability, Quality Assurance and Performativity: The Changing Role of the Academic Board.” Quality in Higher Education 18 (1): 97–110. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.663551.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. 1994. “Strange yet Compatible Bedfellows: Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement.” Australian Universities Review 37 (1): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, J., and A. M. Grant. 2019. “Self-Regulation and Solution-Focused Thinking Mediate the Relationship between Self-Insight and Subjective Well-Being within a Goal-Focused Context: An Exploratory Study.” Cogent Psychology 6 (1): 1695413. doi:10.1080/23311908.2019.1695413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D. 2003. “Between the Milestones: A Narrative account of the Vulnerability of Middle Managers’ Storytelling.” Human Relations 56 (10): 1195–1211. doi:10.1177/00187267035610002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooren, P., B. Brockx, and D. Mortelmans. 2013. “On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching: The State of the Art.” Review of Educational Research 83 (4): 598–642. doi:10.3102/0034654313496870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sue, D., W. 2010. Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• TEQSA (Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency). 2021. Higher Education Framework Standards 2021. https://www.teqsa.gov.au/higher-education-standards-framework-2021
   Google Scholar
• Tsouroufli, M. 2023. “Migrant Academic/Sister Outsider? Feminist Solidarity Unsettled and Intersectional Politics Interrogated.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 25 (1): 1–14. https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol25/iss1/2/.
   Google Scholar
• West, M., S. 2006. “AAUP Faculty Gender Equity Indicators.” American Association of University, 4–84. http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/63396944-44BE-4ABA-9815-5792D93856F1/0/AAUPGenderEquityIndicators2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, E., and K. Johnston. 2022. “Athena SWAN: “Institutional Peacocking” in the Neoliberal University.” Gender, Work & Organization 30 (3): 757–772. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.12941. doi:10.1111/gwao.12941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar