A Survey of Methods of Deriving Individual Grades from Group Assessments

REFERENCES

• Brufee , K. A. 1993 . Collaborative Learning: higher education, interdependence and the authority of knowledge , Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Conway , R. , Kember , D. , Sivan , A. and Wu , M. 1993 . Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 (1) : 45 – 56 .
   Google Scholar
• Earl , S. E. 1986 . Staff and peer assessment—measuring an individual's contribution to group performance . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 11 (1) : 60 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 1988 . Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 25 (4) : 327 – 339 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov , N. 1991 . “ Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group ” . In Self and peer assessment , Edited by: Brown , S. and Dove , P. Birmingham : SCED Publications . (Paper No. 63, Standing Conference on Educational Development)
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs , G. 1992 . Booklet 4: Assessing More Students—The Teaching more Students Project , 26 – 30 . Oxford : The Polytechnics & Colleges Funding Council .
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch , J. and Raeside , R. 1990 . Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 15 (3) : 210 – 231 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch , J. 1994 . Further developments in peer assessment of group projects . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 (1) : 29 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• Habeshaw , S. , Gibbs , G. and Habeshaw , T. 1993 . 53 Interesting Ways to Assess Your Students, , 3rd edn , Melksham : The Cromwell Press .
   Google Scholar
• Harvey , L. and Green , D. 1994 . Employer Satisfaction , University of Central England in Birmingham, Quality in Higher Education Project .
   Google Scholar
• Hindle , B. P. 1993 . The ‘Project’: putting student‐controlled, small‐group work and transferrable skills at the core of a geography course . Journal of Geography in Higher Education , 17 (1) : 11 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann , J. A. 1991 . Computer‐aided cooperative music instruction . Harvard Educational Review , 61 (3) : 270 – 278 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddersfield . 1992 . Draft School Quality Handbook , University of Huddersfield, School of Computing and Mathematics .
   Google Scholar
• Hufford , T. L. 1991 . Increasing academic performance in an introductory biology course . Bioscience , 41 (2) : 107 – 108 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , D. W. and Johnson , R. T. 1975 . Joining Together. Group Theory and Group Skills , New Jersey : Prentice Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Johnson , D. W. and Johnson , R. T. 1989 . Cooperation and Competition. Theory and Research , Edina , MN : Interaction Book Company .
   Google Scholar
• Kane , J. S. and Lawler , E. E. III . 1978 . Methods of peer assessment . Psychological Bulletin , 85 : 555 – 586 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski , R. and Brickman , M. 1987 . Why do assessment centers work? The puzzle of assessment center validity . Personnel Psychology , 30 : 353 – 361 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejk , M. 1994 . Team assessment, win or lose . The New Academic , 3 (3) : 10 – 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Mello , J. A. 1993 . Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings . Journal of Management Education , 17 (2) : 253 – 259 .
   Google Scholar
• Norton , S. M. 1992 . Peer assessments of performance and ability: an exploratory meta‐analysis of statistical artifacts and contextual moderators; . Journal of Business and Psychology , 6 (3) : 387 – 399 .
   Google Scholar
• Payne , L. 1989 . A step towards group learning in computer programming . Computer Education , 63 : 23 – 25 .
   Google Scholar
• Rysavy , D. M. and Sales , G. C. 1991 . Cooperative learning in computer‐based instruction . Educational Technology Research & Development , 39 (2) : 70 – 79 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechtman , Z. 1991 . A revised group assessment procedure for predicting initial teaching success . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 51 (4) : 963 – 974 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechtman , Z. 1992 . Interrater reliability of a single group assessment procedure administered in several educational settings . Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education , 6 : 31 – 39 .
   Google Scholar
• Schechtman , Z. and Godfried , L. 1993 . Assessing the performance and personal traits of teacher education students by a group assessment procedure: a study of concurrent and construct validity . Journal of Teacher Education , 44 (2) : 130 – 138 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheiber , H. J. 1991 . Open‐ended cases and collaborative learning in the business communication course . Bulletin for the Association of Business Communication , 54 (4) : 60 – 64 .
   Google Scholar
• Sharan , S. 1980 . Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations . Review of Educational Research , 50 : 241 – 272 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin , R. E. 1990 . Cooperative Learning. Theory, Research, and Practice , Englewood Cliffs , NJ : Prentice‐Hall .
   Google Scholar
• Thornton , S. C. III and Byham , W. C. 1982 . Assessment Center and Managerial Performance , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Webb , N. 1992 . Collaborative group versus individual assessment in mathematics: group processes and outcomes . National Centre for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing ,
   Google Scholar