651
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Detecting Gender Bias in Peer Marking of Students’ Group Process Work

&
Pages 385-396 | Published online: 10 Jul 2006

REFERENCES

  • Archer , J. 1992 . Sex bias in evaluations at college and work . The Psychologist: Bulletin of the British Psychological Society , 5 (5) : 200 – 204 .
  • Bales , R. F. 1950 . Interaction Process Analysis: a method for the study of small groups , Cambridge : Addison‐Wesley .
  • Bean , G. and Kidder , L. 1982 . Helping and achieving: compatible or competing goals for men and women in medical school? . Social Science and Medicine , 16 : 1377 – 1381 .
  • Belsey , C. 1988 . Marking by numbers . AUT Women: a newsletter published by the Association of University Teachers , 15 : 1 – 2 . Autumn
  • Boud , D. 1986 . Implementing Student Self‐assessment , Green Guide Series, No. 5 Sydney : Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australia .
  • Boud , D. 1989 . The role of self‐assessment in student grading . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 14 (1) : 20 – 30 .
  • Bradley , C. 1993 . Sex bias in student assessment overlooked? . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 (1) : 3 – 8 .
  • Conway , R. , Kember , D. , Sivan , A. and Wu , M. 1993 . Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 18 (1) : 45 – 54 .
  • Cox , R. 1967 . Examinations and higher education: a survey of the literature . University Quarterly , : 292 – 340 .
  • Davis , J. K. and Inamdar , S. 1988 . Use of peer ratings in a pediatric residency . Journal of Medical Education , 63 : 647 – 649 .
  • Dennis , I. and Newstead , S. E. 1994 . The strange case of the disappearing sex bias . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 (1) : 49 – 56 .
  • Eagly , A. H. and Carli , L. L. 1981 . Sex of researchers and sex‐typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: a meta‐analysis of social influence studies . Psychological Bulletin , 90 (1) : 1 – 20 .
  • Fagot , R. 1991 . Reliability of ratings for multiple judges: intraclass correlation and metric scales . Applied Psychological Measurement , 15 (1) : 1 – 11 .
  • Falchikov , N. 1986 . Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self assessments . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 11 (2) : 146 – 165 .
  • Falchikov , N. 1988 . Self and peer assessment of a group project designed to promote the skills of capability . Programmed Learning and Educational Technology , 25 (4) : 327 – 339 .
  • Falchikov , N. 1993 . Group process analysis: self and peer assessment of working together in a group . Educational Technology and Training International , 30 (3) : 275 – 284 .
  • Freeman , M. 1995 . Peer assessment by groups of group work . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 20 (3) : 289 – 300 .
  • Goldberg , P. 1968 . Are women prejudiced against women? . Transaction , 5, April : 28 – 30 .
  • Goldfinch , J. 1994 . Further developments in peer assessment of group projects . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 19 (1) : 29 – 36 .
  • Goldfinch , J. and Raeside , R. 1990 . Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 15 (3) : 210 – 225 .
  • Hall , J. A. 1978 . Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues . Psychological Bulletin , 85 (4) : 845 – 875 .
  • Houston , W. , Raymond , M. and Svec , J. 1991 . Adjustment for rater effects in performance assessment . Applied Psychological Measurement , 15 (4) : 409 – 421 .
  • Johnson , D. W. and Johnson , R. T. 1985 . “ The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups ” . In Learning to Cooperate, Cooperating to Learn , Edited by: Slavin , R. , Sharan , S. , Kagan , S. , Herz‐Lazarowitz , R. , Webb , C. and Schmuck , R. New York and London : Plenum Press .
  • Judd , C , Smith , E. and Kidder , L. 1991 . Research methods in social relations, , 6th edn , Forth Worth : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
  • Kane , J. and Lawler , E. 1978 . Methods of peer assessment . Psychological Bulletin , 85 (3) : 555 – 586 .
  • Kegel‐Flom , P. 1975 . Predicting supervisor, peer and self ratings of intern performance . Journal of Medical Education , 50 (8) : 12 – 15 .
  • Magin , D. Evaluating peer marking procedures for assessing communication and group process skills: two case studies . Paper presented at the Pacific Rim Symposium on Higher Education . June 2–5 , Hilo, Hawaii.
  • Magin , D. 1993b . Should student peer ratings be used as part of summative assessment? . Research and Development in Higher Education , 16 : 537 – 542 .
  • Magin , D. J. and Reizes , J. A. Assessing oral communication skills in large engineering classes: an investigation of peer assessment techniques . Paper presented at the International UNESCO Conference of Engineering Education . May 23–25 , Moscow.
  • Marteau , T. , Humphrey , C , Matoon , G. , Kidd , J. , Lloyd , M. and Horder , J. 1991 . Factors influencing the communication skills of first‐year clinical medical students . Medical Education , 25 : 127 – 134 .
  • Mast , T. A. and Bethart , H. 1978 . Evaluation of clinical dental procedures by senior dental students . Journal of Dental Education , 42 (4) : 196 – 197 .
  • McCulloch , M. L. 1987 . Letter. Blind marking and gender identity . Bulletin of the British Psychological Society , 40 March : 103
  • Morton , J. B. and Macbeth , W. A. A. G. 1977 . Correlations between staff, peer and self assessments of fourth‐year students in surgery . Medical Education , 73 (3) : 335 – 344 .
  • Newstead , S. and Dennis , I. 1990 . Blind marking and sex bias in student assessment . Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education , 15 (2) : 132 – 139 .
  • O'Neill , G. 1985 . Self, teacher and faculty assessments of student teaching performance: a second scenario . The Alberta Journal of Educational Research , 31 (2) : 88 – 98 .
  • Parry‐Langdon , N. 1990 . Marking by numbers: evaluation of the marking of final degree examinations in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Studies , University of Wales, College of Cardiff . Internal Report
  • Spear , M. G. 1984 . Sex bias in science teachers’ ratings of work and pupil characteristics . European Journal of Science Education , 6 (4) : 369 – 377 .
  • Swanson , D. , Case , S. and van der Vleuten , C. 1991 . “ Strategies for student assessment ” . In The Challenge of Problem Based Learning , Edited by: Boud , D. and Feletti , G. 260 – 273 . London : Kogan Page .
  • Swim , J. , Borgida , E. and Maruyama , G. 1989 . Joan McKay versus John McKay: do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? . Psychological Bulletin , 105 (3) : 409 – 429 .
  • Tannen , D. 1992 . You Just Don't Understand: women and men in conversation , London : Virago .
  • Tannen , D. 1996 . Talking From 9 to 5: Women and Men at work. Language, sex and power , London : Virago .
  • Van der Vleuten , C , Norman , G. and De Graaff , E. 1991 . Pitfalls in the pursuit of objectivity: issues of reliability . Medical Education , 25 : 110 – 118 .
  • Wasserman , R. , Inui , T. , Barriatua , R. , Carter , W. and Lippincott , P. 1984 . Paediatric clinicians’ support for parents makes a difference: an outcome‐based analysis of clinician‐parent interaction . Paediatrics , 74 (6) : 1047 – 1053 .
  • Weisman , C. and Teitelbaum , M. 1985 . Physician gender and the physician‐patient relationship: recent evidence and relevant questions . Social Science and Medicine , 20 (11) : 1119 – 1127 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.