How Fair are Student Ratings in Assessing the Teaching Performance of University Teachers?

REFERENCES

• Barnes , M. W. and Patterson , R. H. Using teaching evaluation results to plan departmental personnel strategies to accomplish the institutional teaching mission. Paper presented at the . Annual Meeting of the Society for College and University Planning . August 1988 . Toronto
   Google Scholar
• Brandenburg , D. C. , Slinde , J. A. and Batista , E. E. 1977 . Student ratings of instruction: validity and normative interpretations . Journal of Research in Higher Education , 7 : 67 – 78 .
   Google Scholar
• Braskamp , L. A. , Brandenburg , D. C. and Ory , J. C. 1984 . Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: a practical guide , Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Biglan , A. 1973 . The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas . Journal of Applied Psychology , 57 (3) : 195 – 203 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin , W. E. 1990 . “ Students do rate different academic fields differently ” . In Student Ratings of Instruction: issues for improving practice , Edited by: Theall , M. and Franklin , J. 113 – 121 . San Francisco : Jossey Bass . (New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 43)
   Google Scholar
• Cashin , W. E. 1995 . Student ratings of teaching: the research revisited , IDEA Paper No. 32 Manhattan, KS : Kansas State University, Centre for Faculty Evaluation and Development .
   Google Scholar
• Centra , J. A. and Creech , F. R. 1976 . The relationship between student, teacher, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness , Project Report 76‐1 Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service .
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , P. A. 1990 . “ Bringing research into practice ” . In Student Ratings of Instruction: issues for improving practice , Edited by: Theall , M. and Franklin , J. 123 – 132 . San Francisco : Jossey Bass . (New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 43)
   Google Scholar
• D'Apollonia , S. and Abrami , P. C. 1997 . Navigating student ratings of instruction . American Psychologist , 52 (11) : 1198 – 1208 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekhoff , G. 1992 . Statistics for the Social and Behavioural Sciences: univariate, bivarate, multivariate , Dubuque, IA : Wm. C. Brown Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , K. A. 1978 . Course characteristics and college students’ ratings of their teachers: what we know and what we don't . Research in Higher Education , 9 : 199 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Feldman , K. A. 1984 . Class size and students’ evaluation of college teachers and courses: a closer look . Research in Higher Education , 21 : 45 – 116 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankin , J. and Theall , M. Who read ratings: knowledge, attitude and practice of users of student ratings of instruction . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association . San Francisco, California
   Google Scholar
• Glass , G. V. , Mcgraw , B. and Smith , M. L. 1981 . Meta‐analysis in Social Research , Beverly Hills : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald , A. G. and Gillmore , G. M. 1997 . Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings . American Psychologist , 52 (11) : 1209 – 1217 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell , R. 1997 . Academic freedom, tenure and student evaluation of faculty: galloping’ polls in the 21st century . Education Policy Analysis Archives , 5 (Retrieved from World Wide Web: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa)
   Google Scholar
• Kerridge , J. R. and Mathews , B. P. 1998 . Student ratings of courses in HE: further challenges and opportunities . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 23 (1) : 71 – 82 .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. 1987 . Students’ evaluation of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research . International Journal of Educational Research , 11 : 253 – 388 .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Dunkin , M. J. 1992 . “ Students’ evaluation of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective ” . In Higher Education: handbook of research and practice , Edited by: Smart , J. C. Vol. 8 , New York : Agathon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. and Overall , J. U. Validity of students’ evaluation of teaching: a comparison with instructor self‐evaluation by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty, and graduate faculty . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association . San Francisco : (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 205) .
   Google Scholar
• Marsh , H. W. , Overall , J. U. and Kesler , S. P. 1979 . Class size, students’ evaluations, and instructional effectiveness . American Educational Research Journal , 16 : 57 – 70 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckeachie , W. J. 1997 . Student ratings: the validity of use . American Psychologist , 52 (11) : 1218 – 1225 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann , L. and Neumann , Y. 1985 . Determinants of students’ instructional evaluation: a comparison of four levels of academic areas . Journal of Educational Research , 78 : 152 – 158 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newport , J. F. 1996 . Rating teaching in the USA: probing the qualifications of student raters and novice teachers . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 21 (1) : 17 – 21 .
   Google Scholar
• Ryan , J. J. , Anderson , J. A. and Birchler , A. B. 1980 . Student evaluation: the faculty respond . Research in Higher Education , 12 : 317 – 333 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , R. A. and Cranton , P. A. 1992 . Students’ perceptions of teaching skills and overall effectiveness across instructional settings . Research in Higher Education , 33 (6) : 747 – 764 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theall , M. and Franklin , J. 1990 . Student Ratings of Instruction: issues for improving practice , San Francisco : Jossey Bass . New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 43
   Google Scholar
• Williams , W. M. and Ceci , S. J. 1997 . “ How'm I doing? Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses ” . In Change 13 – 23 . September/October
   Google Scholar