Improvisation Unfolding: Process, Pattern, and Prediction

REFERENCES

• Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. (1993). Improvisation: Its nature and practice in music. (Rev.). New York, NY: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M. S. (2011). Troubling the creative imaginary: Some possibilities of ecological thinking for music and learning. In D. J. Hargreaves, D. Miell, & R. MacDonald (Eds.), Musical imaginations: Multidisciplinary perspectives on creativity, performance and perception (pp. 45–66). Oxford, UK: Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, B. E. (2003). The improvisation of musical dialogue: A phenomenology of music. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, P. (1994). Thinking in jazz: The infinite art of improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgo, D. (2005). Sync or swarm: Improvising music in a complex age. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, I. (2007). Music and cognitive evolution. In R. I. M. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 649–667). Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, I. (2009). The evolutionary nature of musical meaning. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2 Suppl), pp. 179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., White, R. E., & Klus, L. (1996). The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, D. (1998). The psychology of music. Berlin, Germany: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Gritten, A., & King, E. (2006). Music and gesture. Ed. A. Gritten & E. King. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gritten, A., & King, E. (2011). New perspectives on music and gesture. Ed. A. Gritten & E. King. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. T. (1992). Improvisation as an acquired, multilevel process. Ethnomusicology, 36(2), 223–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallam, E., & Ingold, T. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2008). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, D. A., & Sebald, D. C. (2011). Music in the human experience: An introduction to music psychology. New York, NY; London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huys, R. (2010). Dynamical organization of limb movements. In R. Huys & V. K. Jirsa (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior (pp. 69–90). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huys, R., & Jirsa, V. K. (Eds.). (2010). Nonlinear dynamics in human behavior. Berlin, Germany: Springer. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15003161
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, P. E. (2014). Ensemble performance. In W. F. Thompson (Ed.), Music in the social and behavioral sciences: An encyclopedia, pp. 397–400. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A. S. (2003). Cognitive coordination dynamics. In W. Tschacher & J.-P. Dauwalder (Eds.), The dynamical systems approach to cognition: Concepts and empirical paradigms based on self-organization, embodiment, and coordination dynamics (pp. 45–67). Studies of Nonlinear Phenomena in Life Science. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerdahl, F. (2013). Musical syntax and its relation to linguistic syntax. In M. A. Arbib (Ed.), Language, music, and the brain: A mysterious relationship (pp. 257–272). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. (2009). A power stronger than itself: The AACM and American experimental music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loehr, J. D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Joint action: From perception-action links to shared representations. In W. Prinz, M. Beisert, & A. Herwig (Eds.), Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline (pp. 333–356). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonato, M. (2014). The predictive brain: Consciousness, decision and embodied action. Eastbourne, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonato, M., & Dell'Orco, S. (2013). The natural logic of action. World Futures, 69(3), 174–183.
   Google Scholar
• Malloch, S., & Trevarthen, C. (2010). Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malone, T. W., & Bernstein, M. S. (2015). Handbook of collective intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mcintyre, P. (2013). Creativity as a system in action. In K. Thomas & J. Chan (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity (pp. 84–97). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Miell, D., MacDonald, R. A. R., & Hargreaves, D. J. (2005). Musical communication. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, S. (2007). The singing neanderthals: The origins of music, language, mind, and body. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monson, I. (1996). Saying something: Jazz improvisation and interaction. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nettl, B., & Russell, M. (1998). In the course of performance: Studies in the world of musical improvisation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orsucci, F. (2009). Time. In Mind force: On human attractions (pp. 1–14). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rebuschat, P., Rohrmeier, M., Hawkins, J. A., & Cross, I. (Eds.). (2012). Language and music as cognitive systems. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1976). Improvisation. Mind, 85(337), 69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (1997). Creativity in performance. Ed. R. S. Albert. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (1999). Improvised conversations: Music, collaboration, and development. Psychology of Music, 27, 192–216.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2000). Improvisational cultures: Collaborative emergence and creativity in improvisation. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(3), 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Group creativity: Music, theater, Ccollaboration. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration. Psychology of Music, 34(2), 148–165.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (2007). Group genius: The creative power of collaboration. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavio, A., & Høffding, S. (2015). Playing together without communicating? A re-reflective and enactive account of joint musical performance. Musicae Scientiae, 19(4), 366–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seddon, F. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. British Journal of Music Education, 22(1), 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, F., & Biasutti, M. (2009). Modes of communication between members of a string quartet. Psychology of Music, 37(4), 395–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, C. (1998). Musicking: The meanings of performing and listening. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. (2005). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steyvers, M., and Miller, B. (2015). Cognition and collective intelligence. In Malone, T. W. and Bernstein, M. S. (Eds). Handbook of Collective Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, R., & Turvey, M. T. (1991). Thermodynamic reasons for perception-action cycles. Ecological Psychology, 3(4), 317–348.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1955). The concept of nature: Tarner Lectures delivered in Trinity College, 1919. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar