Public dialogue with science and development for teachers of STEM: linking public dialogue with pedagogic praxis

References

• AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2016. Logic model for public engagement with science. Washington, DC: AAAS.
   Google Scholar
• ACME. 2007. The mathematical needs of 14–19 pathways. Advisory Committee on Mathematics Education and the Royal Society. London: The Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S. F., and A. Bakker. 2011. “Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects.” Review of Educational Research 81: 132–169.10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. De Witt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2015. “‘Science Capital’: A Conceptual, Methodological, and Empirical Argument for Extending Bourdieusian Notions of Capital Beyond the Arts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 922–948.10.1002/tea.21227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2012. “‘Balancing Acts’’: Elementary School Girls’ Negotiations of Femininity, Achievement, and Science.” Science Education 96 (6): 967–989.10.1002/sce.v96.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, and J. Osborne. 2015. “Is Science for Us? Black Students’ and Parents’ Views of Science and Science Careers.” Science Education 99 (2): 199–237.10.1002/sce.2015.99.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, and R. Willis. 2013. “Adolescent Boys’ Science Aspirations: Masculinity, Capital, and Power.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (1): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Doestoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, K., and P. Denleg. 2006. “Science Learning Centres and Governmental Policy for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in England.” Journal of In-Service Education 32 (1): 85–102.10.1080/13674580500479836
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, M. 2004. Science in Society: An Introduction to Social Studies of Science. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M. H., and W. W. M. So. 2012. “Analysing Teacher Professional Development Through Professional Dialogue: An Investigation into a University-school Partnership Project on Enquiry Learning.” Journal of Education for Teaching. 38 (3): 323–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. 2008. “Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice.” Science, Technology and Human Values 33 (3): 421–451.10.1177/01622439073075941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and U. Kothari, eds. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny?. New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, N. 1995. “Citizens’ Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions.” In Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, edited by O. Renn, T. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, 157–174. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-0131-8
   Google Scholar
• Culyer, A. J., and J. Lomas. 2006. “Deliberative Processes and Evidence-informed Decision-making in Health Care – Do They Work and How Might We Know?” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2: 357–371.10.1332/174426406778023658
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, E. 2014. “‘Not Designed for Us’: How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups.” Science Education 98 (6): 981–1008.10.1002/sce.2014.98.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einsiedel, E. F. 2008. “Public Participation and Dialogue.” Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by M. Bucchi, and B. Trench, 173–185. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., and L. D. Dierking. 2000. Learning From Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Cárdenas, Juan Manuel. 2014. “El Dialogismo: Secuencialidad, Posicionamiento, Pluralidad e Historicidad en el Análisis de la Práctica Educativa.” [Dialogism: Sequentiality, Positioning, Plurality and Historicity in the Analysis of Educational Practice] Sinéctica 43: 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., and J. R. Ravetz 1994. “The Worth of a Songbird: Ecological Economics as a Post-normal Science.” Ecological Economics 10 (3): 197–207.10.1016/0921-8009(94)90108-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furner, J. M., and D. D. Kumar. 2007. “The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Stand for Teacher Education.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 3: 185–189.10.12973/ejmste/75397
   Google Scholar
• Gamse, B. C., A. Martinez, and L. Bozzi. 2017. “Calling STEM Experts: How Can Experts Contribute to Students’ Increased STEM Engagement?” International Journal of Science Education, Part B 7 (1): 31–59.10.1080/21548455.2016.1173262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. 2015. “The Political Context of Science in the United States: Public Acceptance of Evidence-based Policy and Science Funding.” Social Forces 94 (2): 723–746.10.1093/sf/sov040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, S., R. M. Adelman, J. E. Bodford, O. Graudejus, M. A. Okun, and V. Kwan. 2016. “The Effects of a Female Role Model on Academic Performance and Persistence of Women in STEM Courses.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 38 (5): 258–268.10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holliman, R., and E. Jensen. 2009. “(In)authentic Science and (im)partial Publics: (Re)constructing the Science Outreach and Public Engagement Agenda.” In Investigating Science Communication in the Information Age: Implications for Public Engagement and Popular Media, edited by R. Holliman, L. Whitelegg, E. Scanlon, S. Smidt, and J. Thomas, 35–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horlick-Jones, T., G. Rowe, and J. Walls. 2007. “Citizen Engagement Processes as Information Systems: The Role of Knowledge and the Concept of Translation Quality.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (3): 259–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell Major, C., and M. Savin Baden. 2011. “Integration of Qualitative Evidence: Towards Construction of Academic Knowledge in Social Science and Professional Fields.” Qualitative Research 11 (6): 645–663.10.1177/1468794111413367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IET (Institution of Engineering and Technology). 2008. Studying Stem: What are the barriers? Accessed 8 December 17. www.theiet.org/factfiles/education/stem-report-page.cfm?type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms With the ‘New’ Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320.10.1177/0306312706053350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, E., and N. Buckley. 2014. “Why People Attend Science Festivals: Interests, Motivations and Self-reported Benefits of Public Engagement With Research.” Public Understanding of Science 23: 557–573.10.1177/0963662512458624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, M. P. 2014. “Secondary Data Analysis: A Method of which the Time Has Come.” Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) 3: 619–626.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, S., and J. Durant. 1995. Public Participation in Science: The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe. London: Science Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lavis, J. N., J. A. Boyko, A. D. Oxman, S. Lewin, and A. Fretheim. 2009. “SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Health Policymaking (STP) 14: Organising and Using Policy Dialogues to Support Evidence-informed Policymaking.” Health Research Policy and Systems 7 (Suppl 1): S14.10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., and L. Soneryd. 2007. “Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics.” Public Understanding of Science 16: 279–297.10.1177/0963662507079371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean Davies, L., B. Dickson, F. Rickards, S. Dinham, J. Conroy, and R. Davis. 2015. “Teaching as a Clinical Profession: Translational Practices in Initial Teacher Education – An International Perspective.” Journal of Education for Teaching 41 (5): 514–528.10.1080/02607476.2015.1105537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J. 2012. “Changing Places, Changing Spaces? Towards Understanding Teacher Education Through Space–Time Frameworks.” Journal of Education for Teaching 38 (5): 597–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2010. The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting Head Start on Tomorrow. Accessed 8 December 17. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/3/14/45302349.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, E., N. Jagger, S. Perryman, M. Van Gent, and K. Mann. 2003. Ready SET Go: A Review of SET Study and Career Choices. London: The Institute for Employment Studies and the Engineering and Technology Board.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, A., T. Misa, and J. Schot, eds. 1995. Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511488856
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., and R. Watermeyer. 2016. John Innes Centre engagement on its proposed Science Strategy 2017–2022: Final Report. London: Sciencewise.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Society. 2010. The Scientific Century: Securing our Future Prosperity. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schwan, S., A. Grajal, and D. Lewalter. 2014. “Understanding and Engagement in Places of Science Experience: Science Museums.” Educational Psychologist 49 (2): 70–85.10.1080/00461520.2014.917588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciencewise. 2013. The Government’s Approach to Public Dialogue on Science and Technology. Accessed 8 December 17. http://www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Publications/Sciencewise-Guiding-PrinciplesEF12-Nov-13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., A. Mukhopadhyay, T. N. Allbright, J. A. Marsh, and M. S. Polikoff. 2017. “Speedometry: A Vehicle for Promoting Interest and Engagement Through Integrated STEM Instruction.” The Journal of Educational Research 110 (3): 308–316.10.1080/00220671.2016.1273178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., S. J. Lock, and J. Wilsdon. 2014. “Why Should We Promote Public Engagement With Science?” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 4–15.10.1177/0963662513518154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocklmayer, S., L. Rennie, and J. K. Gilbert. 2010. “The Roles of the Formal and Informal Sectors in the Provision of Effective Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 1–44.10.1080/03057260903562284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., T. J. Moore, and G. H. Roehrig. 2012. Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research: 2 (1): 28–34.10.5703/1288284314653
   Google Scholar
• Teo, T. W., and K. J. Ke. 2014. “Challenges in STEM Teaching: Implication for Preservice and Inservice Teacher Education Program.” Theory Into Practice 53 (1): 18–24.10.1080/00405841.2014.862116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Kerkhof, M. 2006. “Making a Difference: On the Constraints of Consensus Building and the Relevance of Deliberation in Stakeholder Dialogues.” Policy Sciences 39 (3): 279–299.10.1007/s11077-006-9024-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2012. “A Conceptualisation of the Post-museum as Pedagogical Space.” Journal of Science Communication. 11 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2013. “The Presentation of Science in Everyday Life: The Science Show.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 8 (3): 737–751.10.1007/s11422-013-9484-9
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2015. “Science Engagement at the Museum School: Teacher Perspectives on the Contribution of Museum Pedagogy to Science Teaching.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (5): 886–905.10.1002/berj.3173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., and A. Bartlett. 2014. Evaluation of Health Research Authority (HRA) Public and Patient Engagement (PPE) Project. London: Sciencewise.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., and G. Rowe. 2013. Evaluation of Mitochondria Replacement Consultation. London: Sciencewise.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., and K. Yeoman. Forthcoming. “Issues of Connectivity and Continuity in STEM Engagement: Lessons From a Schools-university Partnership. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement.
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R., P. Morton, and J. Collins. 2016. “Rationalising ‘for’ and ‘against’ a Policy for School-led Careers-guidance (SLCG) in STEM in the UK: A Teacher Perspective.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (9): 1441–1458.10.1080/09500693.2016.1195520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. Project Report. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, V., J. Dillon, H. King. 2016. “STEM in England: Meanings and Motivations in the Policy Arena.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (15): 2346–2366.10.1080/09500693.2016.1242818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science-hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Community Genetics 9 (3): 211–220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar