Integration of the humour approach with student’s engagement in teaching and learning sessions

References

• Abraham, R. R., Hande, V., Sharma, M. E. J., Wohlrath, S. K., Keet, C. C., and Ravi. S. 2014. “Use of Humour in Classroom Teaching: Students’ Perspectives.” Thrita 3 (2): 1–4. doi:10.5812/thrita.10517.
   Google Scholar
• Askildson, L. 2005 “Effects of Humour in the Language Classroom: Humour as a Pedagogical Tool in Theory and Practice.” Arizona Working Papers in SLAT 12, 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., N. Dunbar, D. Rodriguez, and S.-J. Liu. 2010. “A Review of Humor in Educational Settings: Four Decades of Research.” Communication Education 60: 115–144. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.496867.
   Google Scholar
• Frymer, A. B., Wanzer, M. B., Wojtaszczyk, A., and Smith, T. 2006. “Appropriate and Inappropriate Uses of Humor by Teachers.” Communication Education 55 (2): 178–196.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, Y. P. 2014. “The Effects of Humor Cartoons in a Series of Bestselling Academic Books.” Humor -International Journal of Humor Research 27 (3): 499–520. doi: 10.1515/humor-2014-0069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisby, B. N., and M. M. Martin. 2010. “Instructor-Student and Student-Student Rapport in the Classroom.” Communication Education 59: 146–164. doi:10.1080/03634520903564362.
   Google Scholar
• Garner, R. L. 2006. “Humour in Pedagogy: How Ha-Ha Can Lead to Aha!” College Teaching 54 (2): 177–179. doi:10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180.
   Google Scholar
• Hoad, C., C. Deed, and A. Lugg. 2013. “The Potential of Humor as a Trigger for Emotional Engagement in Outdoor Education.” Journal of Experiential Education 36: 37–50. doi:10.1177/1053825913481583.
   Google Scholar
• Ivy, L. L. 2013. “Using Humor in the Classroom.” Journal of Adventist Education 75 (3): 39–43.
   Google Scholar
• James, D. L. 2001. “Split a Gut and Learn: Theory and Research” (ERIC Document Reproduction Series No. ED458671). Accessed 14 January 2017. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED458671.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kisno. 2014. “The Use of Pedagogical Humour as a Motivational Teaching Strategy in an Indonesian Institute of Information and Technology.” The 61” TEFLIN International Conference, SMU Solo, Indonesia, 633–636.
   Google Scholar
• Kosiczky, B., and C. A. Mullen. 2013. “Humor in High School and the Role of Teacher Leaders in School Public Relations.” Journal of School Public Relations 34 (1): 6–39.
   Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., and R. Pekrun. 2014. “Students’ Emotions and Academic Engagement: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Contemporary Education Psychology 36 (1). doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Machlev, M., and N. J. Karlin. 2017. “The Relationship between Instructor Use of Different Types of Humor and Student Interest in Course Material.” College Teaching 12 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1080/87567555.2017.1333080.
   Google Scholar
• Makewa, L. N., E. Role, and J. A. Genga. 2011. “Speakers’ Use of Humour in Teaching and Students’ Rating of Their Effectiveness.” International Journal of Education 3 (8): 1–17. doi:10.5296/ije.v3i2.631.
   Google Scholar
• Nasiri, Fuzhan, and F. Mafakheri. 2015. “Higher Education Lecturing and Humor: From Perspective to Strategies.” Higher Education Studies 5 (5): 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Neff, P., and J. Rucynski. 2017. “Japanese Perceptions of Humor in the English Language Classroom.” International Journal of Humor Research 30 (3): 279–301. doi:10.1515/humor-2016-0066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tews, M. J., K. Jackson, C. Ramsay, and J. W. Michel. 2015. “Fun in the College Classroom: Examining Its Nature and Relationship with Student Engagement.” College Teaching 63 (1): 16–26. doi:10.1080/87567555.2014.972318.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., C. Bergin, and D. A. Bergin. 2014. “Measuring Engagement in Fourth to Twelve Grade Classrooms: The Classroom Engagement Inventory.” School Phychology Quarterly 29 (4): 517–535. doi:10.1037/spq0000050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzer, M. B., A. B. Frymier, and J. Irwin. 2010. “An Explanation of the Relationship between Instructor Humor and Student Learning: Instructional Humor Processing Theory.” Communication Education 59: 1–18. doi:10.1080/03634520903367238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar