Improving preservice teachers’ scientific argumentative writing through epistemic practices: a learning progression approach

References

• Akkus, R., M. Gunel, and B. Hand. 2007. “Comparing an Inquiry-Based Approach Known as the Science Writing Heuristic to Traditional Science Teaching Practices: Are There Differences?” International Journal of Science Education 29 (14): 1745–1765. doi:10.1080/09500690601075629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlino, P. 2004. “El Proceso De Escritura Académica: Cuatro Dificultades De La Enseñanza Universitaria” [Academic Writing Process: Four Difficulties of Higher Education Teaching].” Educare 8 (26): 321–327.
   Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., M. Corcelles, A. Iñesta, G. Bañales, and N. Vega. 2011. “Authorial Voice in Academic Writing: A Methodological Proposal for Its Analysis.” Revista Signos 44 (76): 105–117. doi:10.4067/S0718-09342011000200001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., and C. Donahue. 2012. University Writing: Selves and Texts in Academic Societies. Bradford, UK:Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, M. 2000. “El componente ‘tesis’ en los textos argumentativos escolares” [The ‘Thesis’ Component of Argumentative Scholar Texts].” Revista Signos 33 (48): 87–96. doi:10.4067/S0718-09342000004800007.
   Google Scholar
• de Sá Ibraim, S., and R. Justi. 2016. “Teachers’ Knowledge in Argumentation: Contributions from an Explicit Teaching in an Initial Teacher Education Programme.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (12): 1996–2025. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1221546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, R., P. Newton, and J. Osborne. 2000. “Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms.” Science Education 84 (3): 287–312. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 1990. “Teachers as Researchers: Implications for Supervision and for Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 6: 1–26. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(90)90004-O.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. B., K. L. McNeill, M. González-Howard, K. Close, and M. Evans. 2017. “Key Challenges and Future Directions for Educational Research on Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching ( Advance online publication). doi:10.1002/tea.21412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. 2008. Learning Progressions: Supporting Instruction and Formative Assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Jorba, J., I. Gómez, and A. Prat. 2000. Hablar Y Escribir Para Aprender [Speaking and Writing for Learning]. Madrid: Síntesis.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. 2008. “Inquiry, Activity, and Epistemic Practice.” In Teaching Scientific Inquiry: Recommendations for Research and Implementation, edited by R. Duschl and R. Grandy, 99–117. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2005. Education for Thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. 2010. “Teaching and Learning Science as Argument.” Science Education 94 (5): 810–824. doi:10.1002/sce.20395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutluca, A. Y., and A. Aydin. 2016. “An Examination of Prospective Elementary Science Teachers’ Perspective Towards Socio-Scientific Argumentation.” Science Education International 27 (3): 320–343.
   Google Scholar
• Lafuente, M., and I. M. Alvarez. 2016. “Promoting Student Metacognition through the Analysis of Their Own Debates. Is It Better with Text or with Graphics?” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 19 (4): 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T., and J. Turner. 2001. “Student Writing in Higher Education: Contemporary Confusion, Traditional Concerns.” Teaching in Higher Education 6 (1): 57–68. doi:10.1080/13562510020029608.
   Google Scholar
• María, D. S., and C. Pereira. 2004. “La Enseñanza De La Lectura Y La Escritura En El Nivel Superior: Procesos, Prácticas Y Representaciones Sociales” [Reading and Writing Teaching in Higher Education: Processes, Practices and Social Representations].” In Leer y escribir en la universidad. Textos en Contexto 6, edited by P. Carlino, 23–39. Buenos Aires: Asociación Internacional de Lectura.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., and A. M. Knight. 2013. “Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Scientific Argumentation: The Impact of Professional Development on K-12 Teachers.” Science Education 97 (6): 936–972. doi:10.1002/sce.21081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 359–377. doi:10.1080/01411920410001689689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerland, M., and K. Jensen. 2014. “Changing Cultures of Knowledge and Professional Learning.” In International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning, edited by S. Billett, C. Harteis, and H. Gruber, 611–640. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nilssen, V., and R. Solheim. 2015. “‘I See What I See from the Theory I Have Read’. Student Teachers Learning through Theory in Practice.” Journal of Education for Teaching 41 (4): 404–416. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1080423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, S., L. Philips, and J. Osborne. 2007. “Scientific Inquiry: The Place of Interpretation and Argumentation.” In Science as Inquiry in the Secondary Setting, edited by J. Luft, R. Bell, and J. Gess, 87–98. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, A. Christodoulou, C. Howell-Richardson, and K. Richardson. 2013. “Learning to Argue: A Study of Four Schools and Their Attempt to Develop the Use of Argumentation as A Common Instructional Practice and Its Impact on Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (3): 315–347. doi:10.1002/tea.21073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., M. Garcia-Milà, and S. Gilabert. 2013. “What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? an Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (4): 483–520. doi:10.3102/0034654313487606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and M. R. Blanchard. 2012. “Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49: 1122–1148. doi:10.1002/tea.21037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and D. B. Clark. 2008. “Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.” Science Education 92: 447–472. doi:10.1002/sce.20276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., P. Enderle, J. Grooms, and S. Witte. 2013. “Writing to Learn and Learning to Write during the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas.” Science Education 97 (5): 643–670. doi:10.1002/sce.21069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., P. Bell, E. Coleman, N. Enyedy, and D. Suthers. 2000, April. “Designing Knowledge Representations for Learning Epistemic Practices of Science”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., J. Kawasaki, N. Cournoyer, and L. Rodriguez. 2016. “Secondary Teachers’ Emergent Understanding of Teaching Science Practices. Transforming Learning, Empowering Learners.” In The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2016, edited by L. Chee-Kit, J. Polman, U. Cress, and P. Reimann, 737–744. Vol. 2. Singapore: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. Millwood. 2005. “The Quality of Students’ Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations.” Cognition and Instruction 23: 23–55. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2): 235–260. doi:10.1080/09500690500336957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takao, A. Y., and G. J. Kelly. 2003. “Assessment of Evidence in University Students’ Scientific Writing.” Science and Education 12 (4): 341–363. doi:10.1023/A:1024450509847.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2001. Indagación Dialógica: Hacia Una Teoría Y Una Práctica Socioculturales De La Educación [Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Theory and Practice in Education]. Barcelona: Paidós.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, E. D. 1995. “Challenges Confronting the Researcher/Teacher: Conflicts of Purpose and Conduct.” Educational Researcher 24 (3): 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 2007. “Science Teacher Education and Professional Development in Argumentation.” In Argumentation in Science Education, Science and Technology Education Library, S. Erduran and M. P. Jiménez-Aleixandre edited by, 245–268. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar