Can the concept of the protean career help us to understand millennial pre-service teacher retention challenges? A study of two pre-service teachers’ career pathways in England

References

• Allen, R., and S. Sims. 2017. Improving Science Teacher Retention: Do National STEM Learning Network Professional Development Courses Keep Science Teachers in the Classroom? London: Education Datalab.
   Google Scholar
• Bajwa, U., L. Knorr, E. Di Ruggiero, D. Gastaldo, and A. Zendel. 2018. Towards an Understanding of Workers’ Experiences in the Global Gig Economy. Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Behrstock, E., and M. Clifford. 2009. “Leading Gen Y Teachers: Emerging Strategies for School Leaders.” TQ Research and Policy Brief. www.TQsource.org
   Google Scholar
• BERA (British Education Research Association). 2011. Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. Third ed. London: BERA.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J., M. Furrer, E. Harmon, U. Rani, and M. S. Silberman. 2018. Digital Labor Platforms and the Future of Work. Switzerland: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Briscoe, J., and D. Hall. 2006. “The Interplay of Boundaryless and Protean Careers: Combinations and Implications.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 69: 4–18. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsten, M. 1999. “The Time of Generations.” Time & Society 8 (2–3): 249–272. doi:10.1177/0961463X99008002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2019. “The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey: Societal Discord and Technological Transformation Create a “Generation Disrupted”.” https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2012. “Teachers’ Standards.” https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/665520/Teachers__Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DfE (Department for Education). 2018. “Making Data Work.” Report of the Teacher Workload Advisory Group. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/754349/Workload_Advisory_Group-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donnison, S. 2007. “Unpacking the Millennials: A Cautionary Tale for Teacher Education.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 32 (3): 1–13. doi:10.14221/ajte2007v32n3.1.
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, J., and B. Turner. 2005. “Global Generations: Social Change in the Twentieth Century.” British Journal of Sociology 56 (4): 559–578. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00083.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2013. Study on Policy Measures to Improve the Attractiveness of the Teaching Profession in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Findlay, P., and P. Thompson. 2017. “Contemporary Work: Its Meanings and Demands.” Journal of Industrial Relations 59 (2): 122–138. doi:10.1177/0022185616672251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Get into Teaching. 2017. https://getintoteaching.education.gov.uk/funding-and-salary/overview
   Google Scholar
• Hall, D. 1996. “Protean Careers of the 21st Century.” Academy of Management Executive 10: 8–16. doi:10.5465/AME.1996.3145315.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper, E., and R. Eynon. 2009. “Digital Natives: Where Is the Evidence?” British Educational Research Journal 36 (3): 503–520 1-18. doi:10.1080/01411920902989227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, A. J. 2009. “On Being Bottom of the Pecking Order: Beginner Teachers’ Perceptions and Experiences of Support.” Journal of Teacher Development 13: 299–320. doi:10.1080/13664530903578256.
   Google Scholar
• IOP (Institute of Physics). 2017. http://www.iop.org/education/teach/itts/page_52632.html
   Google Scholar
• Krahn, H., and N. Galambos. 2014. “Work Values and Beliefs of ‘Generation X’ and ‘Generation Y’.” Journal of Youth Studies 17 (1): 92–112. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.815701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leßmann, O. 2009. “Capability and Learning to Choose.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 28: 449–460. doi:10.1007/s11217-009-9123-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAO (National Audit Office). 2016. Training New Teachers. London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• NAO (National Audit Office). 2017. Retaining and Developing the Teaching Workforce. London: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• Overell, S., T. Mills, S. Roberts, R. Lekhiet, and R. Blaug. 2010. The Good Work Commission: Provocation Paper 7. London: Work Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Özçelik, G. 2015. “Engagement and Retention of the Millennial Generation in the Workplace through Internal Branding.” International Journal of Business and Management 10 (3): 99–107. doi:10.5539/ijbm.v10n3p99.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, J., and G. Calvert. 2019. “What Motivates People to Teach, and Why Do They Leave? Accountability, Performativity and Teacher Retention.” British Journal of Educational Studies. doi:10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purhonen, S. 2016. “Zeitgeist, Identity and Politics: The Modern Meaning of the Concept of Generation.” In The Routledge International Handbook on Narrative and Life History, edited by I. Goodson, A. Antikainen, P. Sikes, and M. Andrews, 167–178. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• PwC. 2011. “Millennials at Work: Re-shaping the Workplace.” https://www.pwc.de/de/prozessoptimierung/assets/millennials-at-work-2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. 2004. “Gendering Bourdieu’s Concept of Capitals? Emotional Capital, Women and Social Class.” The Sociological Review 52 (2): 57–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00524.x.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2005. “Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement.” Social Indicators Research 74: 191–215. doi:10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, P., S. Harrop, J. Thomas, and T. Cain. 2018. “The Professional Development Needs of Early Career Teachers, and the Extent to Which They are Met: A Survey of Teachers in England.” Professional Development in Education 44 (1): 33–46. doi:10.1080/19415257.2017.1299028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing, G. 2016. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Revelations.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbize, A. 2008. Generational Differences in the Workplace. Research and Training Center on Community Living. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. 2006. Generation Me: Why Today’s Young Americans are More Confident, Assertive, Entitled and More Miserable than Ever Before. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J. 2010. “A Review of the Empirical Evidence on Generational Differences in Work Attitudes.” Journal of Business and Psychology 25 (2): 201–210. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterhalter, E. 2003. Education, Capabilities and Social Justice: Gender and Education for all: the Leap to Equality. EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, C., G. Whitty, I. Menter, P. Black, J. Hordern, A. Parfitt, K. Reynolds, and N. Sorensen. 2018. “Diversity and Complexity: Becoming a Teacher in England in 2015–16.” Review of Education 6 (1): 69–96. doi:10.1002/rev3.3108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, J., S. Lynch, J. Hillary, C. Rennie, and J. Andrade. 2018. Teacher Workforce Dynamics in England. Slough: NFER.
   Google Scholar