Experienced mainstream teachers and student teachers position themselves explicitly and implicitly in relation to inclusive classrooms: global and local implications

References

• Ariav, T. 2006. “Teaching Training Guidelines in Higher Education Institutions in Israel.” Jerusalem: Council for Higher Education in Israel. In Hebrew.
   Google Scholar
• Avissar, G. 2012a. “Inclusive Education in Israel from a Curriculum Perspective: An Exploratory Study.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 27 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1080/08856257.2011.613602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avissar, G. 2012b. “A Mosaic of Models: Teacher Education for Inclusion in Israel.” In Future Directions for Inclusive Teacher Education, edited by C. Forlin, 43–51. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Avissar, G., P. Licht, and G. Vogel. 2016. “Equality? Inclusion? Do They Go Hand-in-hand? Policy Makers’ Perceptions of Inclusion of Pupils with Special Needs – An Exploratory Study.” Universal Journal of Educational Research 4 (5): 973–979. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040506.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination, edited by, M. Holoquist, C. Emerson, and M. Holoquist, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. 1986. “In Pursuit of the Expert Pedagogue.” Educational Research 15 (7): 5–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X015007007.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorn, P. M., M. Aro., T. Koponen., L. S. Fuchs, and D. Fuchs. 2018. “Response to Intervention in Finland and the United States: Mathematics Learning Support as an Example.” Frontiers in Psychology 9: 800. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanton, L. P., M. C. Pugach, and M. Boveda. 2018. “Interrogating the Intersections between General and Special Education in the History of Teacher Education Reform.” Journal of Teacher Education 69 (4): 354–366. doi:10.1177/002248778539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clark. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. 2007. “Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk.” Discourse & Society 18 (2): 197–222. doi:10.1177/0957926507073376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics), Israel. 2013. http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/?MIval=cw_usr_view_SHTMLandID=390 [In Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M. 2015. “Keeping Teaching Complex: Policy, Research and Practice.” Venue: Educational Sciences 4: 1–11. doi:10.3384/venue.2001-788X.15411.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and R. Harré. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, T., and A. Prunty. 2010. “The Role of Special Schools and Special Classes in Ireland.” REACH: Journal of Special Needs Education in Ireland 24 (1): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Department of Health. 2015. “Special Educational Needs and Disability Code of Practice: 0 to 25 Years”. London, UK. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/atta chment_data/file/398815/SEND_Code_of_Practice_January_2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, E. 2018. “The Inclusion and Exclusion of Students with Disability Related Problem Behavior in Mainstream Australian Schools.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Education Law for Schools, edited by K. Trimmer, R. Dixon, and Y. Findlay, 353–372. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Downing, J. E., and K. D. Peckham-Hardin. 2007. “Inclusive Education: What Makes It a Good Education for Students with Moderate to Severe Disabilities?” Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities 32 (1): 16–30. doi:10.2511/rpsd.32.1.16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EADSNE (European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education). 2013. Organization of Provision to Support Inclusive Education- Literature Review. Odense, Denmark: EADSNE.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz-Luwisch, F. 2007. “Studying Teachers’ Lives and Experience: Narrative Inquiry into K–12 Teaching.” In Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology, edited by D. Jean Clandinin, 357–382. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• EU (European Union). 2011. “EU Ratifies UN Convention on Disability Rights”. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-11-4_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2017. “Mantras and Myths: The Disenchantment of Mixed-Methods Research and Revisiting Triangulation as a Perspective.” Qualitative Inquiry 23 (1): 46–57. doi:10.1177/1077800416655827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forlin, C., ed. 2012. Future Directions for Inclusive Teacher Education. chapters 1, 8, 11. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S. 2003. “Assessing Treatment Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 18 (3): 172–186. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00073.
   Google Scholar
• Gavish, B. 2017. “Four Profiles of Inclusive Supportive Teachers: Perceptions of Their Status and Role in Implementing Inclusion of Students with Special Needs in General Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 61: 37–46. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identités. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., and S. Wiggins, eds. 2007. Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IDEA: Individual with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (2004). Pub L. No. 108-446
   Google Scholar
• IME (Israel Ministry of Education). 2017. “Professional Guidance and Financing Differential Diagnoses for Students with Learning Disabilities.” Electronic version in Hebrew. https://edu.gov.il/owlHeb/Pages/new-plan- 2017.aspx [In Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A., and S. R. Forness. 2000. “History, Rhetoric and Reality: Analysis of the Inclusion Debate.” Remedial and Special Education 21 (5): 279–296. doi:10.1177/074193250002100505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korobov, N., and M. Bamberg. 2007. “‘Strip Poker! They Don’t Show Nothing!’”: Positioning Identities in Adolescent Male Talk about a Television Game Show.” In Selves and Identities in Narrative and Discourse, edited by M. Bamberg., A. De Fina, and D. Schiffrin, 253–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kupferberg, I. 2016. Touching the Sky: Text and Discourse-Oriented Figurative Language Analysis. Tel Aviv: MOFET Institute. In Hebrew.
   Google Scholar
• Kupferberg, I., and D. Green. 2005. Troubled Talk: Metaphorical Negotiation in Problem Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kupferberg, I., I. Gilat, E. Dahan, and A. Doron. 2013. “Exploring the Discursive Positioning of a Schizophrenic Inpatient via Method Triangulation.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 12 (1): 20–38. doi:10.1177/160940691301200108.
   Google Scholar
• Kurzon, D. 2007. “Towards a Typology of Silence.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (10): 1673–1688. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkin, P. H., and J. Okamoto. 2015. “The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act for Children with Special Educational Needs.” American Academy of Pediatrics 136 (6): 1650–1662. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovin, L., M. Kyger, and D. Allsopp. 2004. “Differentiation in Special Needs Learners.” Teaching Children Mathematics 11 (3): 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Malki, S., and T. Einat. 2018. “To Include or Not to Include – This Is the Question: Attitudes of Inclusive Teachers toward the Inclusion of Pupils with Intellectual Disabilities in Elementary Schools.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 13 (1): 65–80. doi:10.1177/1746197917705138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, M. J. 1997. Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manor-Binyamini, I. 2015. Language and Discourse in Special Education: Understanding Ethnographic Interdisciplinary Team Culture. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei, L. 2009. “An Impossibly Full Voice.” In Voice in Qualitative Inquiry: Challenging Conventional, Interpretive, and Critical Conceptions in Qualitative Research, edited by A. Y. Jackson and L. Mazzei, 45–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McMenamin, T. 2011. “The Tenacity of Special Schools in an Inclusive Policy Environment: The New Zealand Situation 1996-2010.” Support for Learning 26 (3): 97–102. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9604.2011.01486.x.
   Google Scholar
• Norwich, B. 2008. “What Future for Special Schools and Inclusion? Conceptual and Professional Perspectives.” British Journal of Special Education 35 (3): 136–143. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8578.2008.00387.x.
   Google Scholar
• PL (Public Law) 94-142. 1975. “The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 USC Sections 1402, Et Seq. 1982”. Washington, DC: Congress of the USA. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE- 89/pdf/STATUTE-89-Pg773.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Powell, D. 2012. “A Review of Inclusive Education in New Zealand.” Electronic Journal for Inclusive Education 2 (10): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., and T. Dalgleish. 1997. Cognition and Emotion: From Order to Disorder. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• SEL (Special Education Law) 1988, 2002, 2018. https://www.justice.gov.il/Units/NetzivutShivyon/publications/news/Pages/speci al_ed_reform.aspx [In Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Shani, M., and O. Hebel. 2016. “Education Towards Inclusive Education: Assessing a Teacher-Training Program for Working with Pupils with Special Education Needs and Disabilities Enrolled in General Education Schools.” International Journal of Special Education 31 (3): 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling, D., S. Reiter, and L. Josefsberg Ben-Yehoshua. 2019. Policy on Eligibility for Special Education Services, ed L. Josefsberg Ben-Yehoshua. [In Hebrew]. Tel Aviv, Israel: Mofet Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stoutjesdijk, R., E. M. Scholte, and H. Swaab. 2016. “Special Needs Characteristics of Children with Emotional and Behavioural Disorders that Affect Inclusion in Regular Education.” Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders 20 (2): 92–104. doi:10.1177/1063426611421156.
   Google Scholar
• Symeonidou, S., and H. Phtiaka. 2014. “‘My Colleagues Wear Blinkers … if They Were Trained, They Would Understand Better’. Reflections on Teacher Education on Inclusion in Cyprus.” Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 14 (2): 110–119. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2012.01234.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomazet, S. 2009. “From Integration to Inclusive Education: Does Changing the Terms Improve Practice?” International Journal of Inclusive Education 13 (6): 553–563. doi:10.1080/13603110801923476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Salamanca, Spain: Author.
   Google Scholar
• WHO/World Bank Report 2011. “World Report on Disability”. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304079/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK304079. pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zagora, A. L., J. A. Kurth, and S. Z. C. MacFarland. 2017. “Teachers’ Views of Their Preparation for Inclusive Education and Collaboration.” Teacher Education and Special Education 40 (3): 163–178. doi:10.1177/0888406417692969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar