Vygotsky, education, and teacher education

References

• Arshad, M., and W. H. Chen. 2009. “Vygotsky’s Socio-cultural Theory of Literacy: Scaffolding Children to Read and Write at an Early Age.” Wacana 11: 319–334. doi:https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v11i2.164.
   Google Scholar
• Bekiryazıcı, M. 2015. “Teaching Mixed-level Classes with a Vygotskian Perspective.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186: 913–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.163.
   Google Scholar
• Berducci, D. F. 2004. “Vygotsky through Wittgenstein: A New Perspective on Vygotsky’s Developmental Continuum.” Theory and Psychology 14 (3): 329–353. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304043639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Félix, E., and H. Daniels. 2018. “The Social Construction of a Teacher Support Team: An Experience of University Lecturers’ Professional Development in STEM.” Journal of Education for Teaching 44 (1): 14–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2018.1422610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S. 2003. “The Zone of Proximal Development in Vygotsky’s Analysis of Learning and Instruction.” In Vygotsky’s Educational Theory in Cultural Context, edited by A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, and S. M. Miller, 39–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. 2009. “The Perils of Translation: A First Step in Reconsidering Vygotsky’s Theory of Development in Relation to Formal Education.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 16: 291–295. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030902795568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. 1996. “Vygotskian Approaches in Human Development in the Information Era.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 31 (1–2): 43–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143926.
   Google Scholar
• Dafermos, M. 2016. “Critical Reflection on the Reception of Vygotsky’s Theory in the International Academic Communities.” Cultural-Historical Psychology 12 (3): 27–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2016120303.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L., and S. E. Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Age of the Computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, R. 2013. “How Silent Is the ‘Silent Period’ for Young Bilinguals in Early Years Settings in England?.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 21: 380–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2013.814362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, V. 2010. “Impoverishing Experience: The Problem of Teacher Education in England.” Journal of Education for Teaching 36 (1): 105–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02607470903462230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyler, J. (2015).“More than Mindsets: Why Vygotsky Still Matters.” https://cte.rice.edu/blogarchive/2015/07/14/morethanmindsets
   Google Scholar
• Fani, T., and F. Ghaemi. 2011. “Implications of Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in Teacher Education: ZPTD and Self-scaffolding.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 29: 1549–1554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.396.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M. 2016. “The Vygotsky Project in Education – The Theoretical Foundations for Analysing the Relations between the Personal, Institutional and Societal Conditions for Studying Development.” In Activity Theory in Education: Research and Practice, edited by D. S. P. Gedera and P. J. Williams, 1–15. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ghassemzadeh, H. 2009. “Vygotsky in Iran: A Personal Account.” Cultural-Historical Psychology 4: 7–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.
   Google Scholar
• Gillen, J. 2000. “Versions of Vygotsky.” British Journal of Educational Studies 48 (2): 183–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. 1993. “Reflections on Schön: An Epistemological Critique and a Practical Alternative.” In International Analyses of Teacher Education, edited by P. Gilroy and M. Smith, 125–142. Abingdon: Carfax Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, J. A. 1992. “Werner’s Relevance for Contemporary Developmental Psychology.” Developmental Psychology 28 (4): 558–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harland, T. 2003. “Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development and Problem-based Learning: Linking a Theoretical Concept with Practice through Action Research.” Teaching in Higher Education 8 (2): 263–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251032000052483.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, C. 2014. “The Curriculum.” In Education Studies: An Issues-based Approach, edited by W. Curtis, S. Ward, J. Sharp, and L. Hankin, 49–60. London: Learning Matters/Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, W., and D. Waugh. 2017. NQT: The Beginning Teacher’s Guide to Outstanding Practice. London: Learning Matters/Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P. E. 2009. “From ‘External Speech’ to ‘Inner Speech’ in Vygotsky: A Critical Appraisal and Fresh Perspectives.” Language & Communication 29 (2): 166–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2008.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khaliliaqdam, S. 2014. “ZPD, Scaffolding and Basic Speech Development in EFL Context.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98: 891–897. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.497.
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, M., and M. Ahmadi Safa. 2011. “The Effectiveness of ZPD-wise Explicit/implicit Expert Peers and Co-equals’ Scaffolding in ILP Development.” Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) 14 (1): 47–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kinard, J. T., and A. Kozulin. 2008. Rigorous Mathematical Thinking: Conceptual Formation in the Mathematics Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovalainen, M., and K. Kumpulainen. 2007. “The Social Construction of Participation in an Elementary Classroom Community.” International Journal of Educational Research 46: 141–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.09.011.
   Google Scholar
• Kuusisaari, H. 2014. “Teachers at the Zone of Proximal Development – Collaboration Promoting or Hindering the Development Process.” Teaching and Teacher Education 43: 46–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. A., and J. Valsiner. 2003. “Making Personal Sense: An Account of Basic Internalization and Externalization Processes.” Theory and Psychology 13 (6): 723–752. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303136001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I.-F., and C.-L. Tseng. 2008. “Cultural Conflicts of the Child‐centered Approach to Early Childhood Education in Taiwan.” Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 28 (2): 183–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140802163600.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm, N. 1971. “The Myth of Cognitive Processes and Structures.” In Cognitive Development and Epistemology, edited by T. Mischel, 385–392. New York and London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• McAllum, R. 2014. “Reciprocal Teaching: Critical Reflection on Practice.” Kairarange 15 (1): 26–35.
   Google Scholar
• Meshcheryakov, A. I. 1979. Awakening to Life: On the Education of Deaf-Blind Children in the Soviet Union. Translated by K. Judelson. Moscow: Progress Publishers. transcribed by A Blunden. https://www.marxists.org/archive/meshcheryakov/awakening/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R., F. Myles, and E. Marsden. 2013. Second Language Learning Theories. 3 ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, I. A. C., and P. Morris. 2001. “The Metamorphosis of the ‘Virtuoso’: Pedagogic Patterns in Hong Kong Primary Mathematics Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 17 (4): 455–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00006-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcom, V. 2014. “Scaffolding Social and Emotional Learning in an Elementary Classroom Community: A Sociocultural Perspective.” International Journal of Educational Research 67: 18–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2014.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S. 1999. Philosophy and Teacher Education: A Reinterpretation of Donald A. Schön’s Epistemology of Reflective Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. 2018. “Vygotsky, Wittgenstein, and Sociocultural Theory.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48: 350–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurfaidah, S. 2018. “Vygotsky’s Legacy on Teaching and Learning Writing as Social Process.” Langkawi: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English 4 (2): 149–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.31332/lkw.v4i2.1038.
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, C., and P. Clough. 2014. Early Childhood Education: History, Philosophy and Experience. 2 ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Palaiologou, I. 2008. Childhood Observation. Exeter: Learning Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pugh, G., and B. Duffy. 2006. Contemporary Issues in the Early Years. 4 ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rezaee, A. A., and Z. Azizi. 2012. “The Role of Zone of Proximal Development in the Students’ Learning of English Adverbs.” Journal of Language Teaching and Research 3 (1): 51–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.51-57.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, S. 2006. Developing Thinking and Understanding in Young Children: An Introduction for Students. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W.-M., and Y.-J. Lee. 2007. “‘Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Review of Educational Research 77 (2): 186–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654306298273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage Publishing. n.d. “10 Learning Theorists Every Trainee Teacher Must Know.” https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/learning_theories_cards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seng, S. H. 2000. “Teaching and Learning Primary Mathematics in Singapore.” In Annual International Conference and Exhibition of the Association for Childhood Education. Baltimore, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Shabani, K. 2016. “Applications of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Approach for Teachers’ Professional Development.” Cogent Education 3 (1): 1–10 (1252177). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1252177.
   Google Scholar
• Shabani, K., M. Khatib, and S. Ebadi. 2010. “Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development: Instructional Implications and Teachers’ Professional Development.” English Language Teaching 3 (4): 237–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p237.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. 2011. Vygotsky and Literacy Research: A Methodological Framework. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. 2018. “Is Instructional Scaffolding Actually Vygotskian, and Why Should It Matter to Literacy Teachers?.” Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 62 (3): 253–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephen, C. 2010. “Pedagogy: The Silent Partner in Early Years Learning.” Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 30 (1): 15–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09575140903402881.
   Google Scholar
• Titcombe, R. 2017.“The Growth Mindset Misunderstood.” https://www.localschoolsnetwork.org.uk/2017/01/the-growth-mindset-misunderstood
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. B. M. 2003. Understanding Expertise in Teaching: Case Studies of ESL Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., and A. Yasnitsky. 2011. “Vygotsky in English: What Still Needs to Be Done.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45: 475–493. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9172-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., and E. Zavershneva. 2018. “The Final Chapter of Vygotsky’s Thinking and Speech: A Reader’s Guide.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 54: 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Thought and Language, Translated by A. Kozulin and M. A. Cambridge. London, England: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. “Thinking and Speech.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. VoL. 1: Problems of General Psychology, edited by R. W. Rieber and A. S. Carton, 39–285. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1998a. The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol 5: Child Psychology, Translated by M. J. Hall. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1998b. “Development of Interests at the Transitional Stage.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. VoL. 5: Child Psychology, edited by R. W. Rieber, 3–28. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1998c. “Development of Thinking and Formation of Concepts in the Adolescent.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. VoL. 5: Child Psychology, edited by R. W. Rieber, 29–82. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1998d. “The Problem of Age.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. VoL. 5: Child Psychology, edited by R. W. Rieber, 187–205. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warford, M. K. 2011. “The Zone of Proximal Teacher Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 252–258. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry. Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wentzel, K. R., and D. E. Watkins. 2002. “Peer Relationships and Collaborative Learning as Contexts for Academic Enablers.” School Psychology Review 31 (3): 366–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasnitsky, A. 2011a. “Vygotsky Circle as a Personal Network of Scholars: Restoring Connections between People and Ideas.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45: 422–457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9168-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasnitsky, A. 2011b. “The Vygotsky that We (Do Not) Know: Vygotsky’s Main Works and the Chronology of Their Composition.” Psychological Journal 4 (4): 53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Yasnitsky, A., and R. van der Veer. 2016. ““Lost in Translation”: Talking about Sense, Meaning, and Consciousness.” In Revisionist Revolution in Vygotsky Studies, edited by A. Yasnitsky and R. van der Veer, 229–240. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yasnitsky, A. 2019. “Vygotsky’s Science of Superman: From Utopia to Concrete Psychology.” In Questioning Vygotsky’s Legacy: Scientific Psychology or Heroic Cult, edited by A. Yasnitsky, 1–21. Abingdon, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar