Lens model studies: Revealing teachers’ judgements for teacher education

References

• *Studies included in our review
   Google Scholar
• *Athanasou, J. A., and R. W. Cooksey. 2001. “Judgment of Factors Influencing Interest: An Australian Study.” Journal of Vocational Education Research 26 (1): 77–96. doi:10.5328/JVER26.1.77.
   Google Scholar
• *Cooksey, R. W., P. Freebody, and G. R. Davidson. 1986. “Teachers’ Predictions of Children’s Early Reading Achievement: An Application of Social Judgment Theory.” American Educational Research Journal 23 (1): 41–64. doi:10.3102/00028312023001041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cooksey, R. W., P. Freebody, and C. Wyatt-Smith. 2007. “Assessment as Judgment-in-context: Analyzing How Teachers Evaluate Students’ Writing.” Educational Research and Evaluation 13 (5): 401–434. doi:10.1080/13803610701728311.
   Google Scholar
• *Eshleman, J. L. 2009. “Math Teachers’ Intuitions about Student Success in Algebra.” (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University.
   Google Scholar
• *Wiggins, N., and E. S. Kohen. 1971. “Man versus Model of Man Revisited: The Forecasting of Graduate School Success.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19 (1): 100–106. doi:10.1037/h0031147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumert, J., and M. Kunter. 2006. “Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften.” Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 9 (4): 469–520. doi:10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2. Key word: Professional Competence of Teachers.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, I. 1993. “The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 703 (1 Doing More Go): 156–163. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26345.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., F. Ell, L. Grudnoff, M. Haigh, M. Hill, and L. Ludlow. 2016. “Initial Teacher Education: What Does It Take to Put Equity at the Center?” Teaching and Teacher Education 57: 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalbert, C., and J. Maes. 2002. “Belief in a Just World as a Personal Resource in School.” In The Justice Motive in Social Life. Essays in Honor of Melvin Lerner, edited by M. Ross and D. T. Miller, 365–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyches, J., and A. Boyd. 2017. “Foregrounding Equity in Teacher Education: Toward a Model of Social Justice Pedagogical and Content Knowledge.” Journal of Teacher Education 68 (5): 476–490. doi:10.1177/0022487117705097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., E. Walther, P. Freytag, and H. Plessner. 2002. “Judgment Bias in A Simulated Classroom – A Cognitive-Environmental Approach.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 88 (1): 527–561. doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gralewski, J., and M. Karwowski. 2019. “Are Teachers’ Ratings of Students’ Creativity Related to Students’ Divergent Thinking? A Meta-analysis.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 33. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R. 2000. “Judgments Under Stress”. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R., and T. R. Stewart. 2001. “The Essential Brunswik: Beginnings, Explications, Applications”. Oxford, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heymann, H. W. 2009. “Lernen Verstehen, Anleiten und Begleiten. Diagnostizieren und Fördern als Schulische Handlungsfelder.” Pädagogik 61 (12): 6–9. Understand, Guide and Accompany Learning. Diagnosing and Promoting as School Fields of Action.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., and T. Coladarci. 1989. “Judgments of Academic Achievement: A Review of Literature.” Review of Educational Research 59 (3): 297–313. doi:10.3102/00346543059003297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Bias.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A., and C. Rohlfs. 2009. “Diagnosekompetenz Als Zukunftsaufgabe: Zur Ausbildung von Diagnose- Und Förderkompetenzen in der Lehrerbildung”. [ Diagnostic Competence as a Future Task: To Develop Diagnostic and Support Skills in Teacher Training]. Pädagogik 62 (12): 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Karelaia, N., and R. Hogarth. 2008. “Determinants of Linear Judgment: A Meta-analysis of Lens Studies.” Psychological Bulletin 134 (3): 404–426. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E. 2020. “How Accurately Do Teachers’ Judge Students? Re-Analysis of Hoge and Coladarci (1989) Meta-Analysis.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 63: 101902. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E. 2021. “Algorithm Appreciation or Aversion? In-Service and Pre-Service Teachers’ Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models.” Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence 2. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100028.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E., and D. V. Budescu. 2020. “Do Teachers Consider Advice? On the Acceptance of Computerized Expert Models.” Journal of Educational Measurement 57 (2): 311–342. doi:10.1111/jedm.12251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E., U.-D. Reips, and K. Maag Merki. 2016. “Avoiding Methodological Biases in Meta-Analysis: Use of Online versus Offline Individual Participant Data (IPD) in Educational Psychology Special Issue. Hotspots in Psychology”. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 224 (3): 157–167. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E., U.-D. Reips, W. W. Wittmann, 2013. “A Critical Meta-Analysis of Lens Model Studies in Human Judgment and Decision-Making.” PLoS ONE 8 (12): e83528. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, E., L. Sjödahl, and R. Mutz. 2007. “The Idiographic Approach in Social Judgment Theory: A Review of Components of the Lens Model Equation Components.” International Journal of Idiographic Science 2: 1–28 .
   Google Scholar
• KMK [Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland]. 2004. Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. [Standards of Teaching Education: Educational Science]. (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.12.2004) Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• Machts, N., J. Kaiser, F. T. C. Schmidt, and J. Moller. 2016. “Accuracy of Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ Cognitive Abilities: A Meta-analysis.” Educational Research Review 19: 85–103. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2016.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, Paul E. 1954. Clinical versus Statistical Prediction: A Theoretical Analysis and a Review of the Evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanin, J. R., B. R. Maynard, and N. A. Dell. 2016. “Overviews in Educational Research: A Systematic Review and Analysis.” Review of Educational Research 87 (1): 172–203. doi:10.3102/0034654316631117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauthmann, J. F., and R. A. Sherman. 2021. “Conceptualizing and Measuring the Psychological Situation.” In Measuring and modeling the person and situation, edited by D. Wood, P. Harms, S. Read, and A. Slaughter, 427-463. Elsevier: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resh, N., and C. Sabbagh. 2016. “Justice and Education.” In Handbook of Justice Theory and Research, edited by C. Sabbagh and M. Schmitt, 349–368. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. S. 1950. “Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals.” American Sociological Review 15 (2): 351–357. doi:10.1093/ije/dyn357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H. R. 2008. “Publication Bias as a Threat to the Validity of Meta-analytic Results.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 4 (1): 61–81. doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9046-9.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., and J. E. Hunter. 2014. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. 1973. “What Is the Basic Teaching Skill?” Journal of Teacher Education 24 (2): 144–151. doi:10.1177/002248717302400213.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, R. E. 1968. “Brunswikian Approach to Research on Teaching.” American Educational Research Journal 5 (4): 475–489. doi:10.3102/00028312005004475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Südkamp, A., J. Kaiser, and J. Möller. 2012. “Accuracy of Teachers’ Judgments of Students’ Academic Achievement: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Educational Psychology 104 (3): 743–763. doi:10.1037/a0027627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R. 1964. “A Suggested Alternative Formulation in the Developments by Hursch, Hammond and Hursch and by Hammond, Hursch and Todd.” Psychological Review 71 (6): 528–530. doi:10.1037/h0047061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urhahne, D., and L. Wijnia. 2021. “A Review on the Accuracy of Teacher Judgments.” Educational Research Review 32 Article 100374: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. 2010. “Conducting Meta-analyses in R with the Metafor Package.” Journal of Statistical Software 36 (3): 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. D., and J. Shanteau. 2021. “The Futility of Decision Making Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90: 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.08.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmann, W. W. 1988. “Multivariate Reliability Theory. Principles of Symmetry and Successful Validation Strategies.” In Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, edited by J. R. Nessleroad and R. B. Cattell, 505–560. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar