Developing pre-service teachers’ practical knowledge through formative interventions

References

• Allas, R., Ä. Leijen, and A. Toom. 2020. “Guided Reflection Procedure as a Method to Facilitate Student Teachers’ Perception of Their Teaching to Support the Construction of Practical Knowledge.” Teachers and Teaching 26 (2): 166–192. doi:10.1080/13540602.2020.1758053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2009. The Nicomachean Ethics L, Brown. (Ed). D Ross (Trans., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Athanases, S.Z., S.L. Sanchez, and L.M. Martin. 2020. “Saturate, Situate, Synthesize: Fostering Preservice Teachers’ Conceptual and Practical Knowledge for Learning to Lead Class Discussion.” Teaching and Teacher Education 88 (2): 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustsson, D. 2021. “Expansive Learning in a Change Laboratory Intervention for Teachers.” Journal of Educational Change 22 (1): 475–499. doi:10.1007/s10833-020-09404-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, A. L., and G. Halliwell. 2000. “Accessing Practical Knowledge: How? Why?” Teaching and Teacher Education 16 (1): 103–115. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00045-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, L. H., P. C. Meijer, B. Koster, S.F. Akkerman, and J. D. Vermunt. 2013. “Consequential Research Designs in Research on Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 33 (7): 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2013.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaharbashloo, H., K. Gholami, M. Aliasgari, H. Talebzadeh, and N. Mousapour. 2020. “Analytical Reflection on Teachers‘ Practical Knowledge: A Case Study of Exemplary Teachers in an Educational Reform Context.” Teaching and Teacher Education 87 (1): 102–131. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.102931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X. 2011. Bridging Theory and Praxis: Research on Teacher Practical Knowledge. Beijing: Educational Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X., G. Wei, and S. Jiang. 2017. “The Ethical Dimension of Teacher Practical Knowledge: A Narrative Inquiry into Chinese Teachers’ Thinking and Action in Dilemmatic Spaces.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 49 (4): 518–541. doi:10.1080/00220272.2016.1263895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clandinin, D.J., and F.M. Connelly. 1995. Teachers’ Professional Knowledge Landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Debreli, E. 2019. “Teacher Shadowing as an Empowering Technique for EFL Student Teacher Practical Knowledge Development: Insights from Three-Week Shadowing Programmes.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 47 (4): 432–452. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2018.1504878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1904. “The Relation of Theory to Practice in Education.” In The Relation between Theory and Practice in the Education of Teachers: Third Yearbook of the National Society for the Scientific Study of Education, edited by C.A. McMurry, 9–30. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1929. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: Minton Balch Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, I. 1993. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User-Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaz, F. 1983. Teacher Thinking: A Study of Practical Knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, V., C. Gower, K. Frederick, and A. Childs. 2015. “Formative Interventions and Practice-Development: A Methodological Perspective on Teacher Rounds.” International Journal of Educational Research 73: 44–52. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2015. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., J. Rantavuori, and H. Kerosuo. 2013. “Expansive Learning in a Library: Actions, Cycles and Deviations from Instructional Intentions.” Vocations and Learning 6 (1): 81–106. doi:10.1007/s12186-012-9089-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2010. “Studies of Expansive Learning: Foundations, Findings and Future Challenges.” Educational Research Review 5 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., and A. Sannino. 2021. “From Mediated Actions to Heterogeneous Coalitions: Four Generations of Activity-Theoretical Studies of Work and Learning.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 28 (1): 4–23. doi:10.1080/10749039.2020.1806328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenstermacher, G. D. 1994. “The Knower and the Known: The Nature of Knowledge in Research on Teaching.” Review of Research on Teaching 20 (1): 1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Georgiou, D., S.Y. Mok, F. Fischer, J. D. Vermunt, and T. Seidel. 2020. “Evidence-Based Practice in Teacher Education: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Practical Knowledge.” Frontiers in Education 5: 1–15. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.559192.
   Google Scholar
• Gholami, K., and J. Husu. 2010. “How Do Teachers Reason about Their Practice? Representing the Epistemic Nature of Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (8): 1520–1529. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero, S. 2017. Pedagogical Knowledge and the Changing Nature of the Teaching Profession. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K.D., and W. Penuel. 2014. “Relevance to Practice as a Criterion for Rigor.” Educational Researcher 43 (1): 19–23. doi:10.3102/0013189X13520289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haapasaari, A., and H. Kerosuo. 2015. “Transformative Agency: The Challenges of Sustainability in a Long Chain of Double Stimulation.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 4: 37–47. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthagen, F. 2017. “Inconvenient Truths about Teacher Learning: Towards Professional Development 3.0.” Teachers and Teaching 23 (4): 387–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• la Velle, L. 2021. “Teachers’ Learning and Knowledge: Motivation and Self-Efficacy.” Journal of Education for Teaching 47 (4): 471–474. doi:10.1080/02607476.2021.1965420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert, M. 2010. “Learning Teaching In, From, and for Practice: What Do We Mean?” Journal of Teacher Education 61 (1–2): 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., and C.J. Kuo. 2013. Video Content Analysis Using Multimodal Information. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maaranen, K., H. Pitkäniemi, K. Stenberg, and L. Karlsson. 2016. “An Idealistic View of Teaching: Teacher Students’ Personal Practical Theories.” Journal of Education for Teaching 42 (1): 80–92. doi:10.1080/02607476.2015.1135278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männikkö, I., and J. Husu. 2019. “Examining Teachers’ Adaptive Expertise through Personal Practical Theories.” Teaching and Teacher Education 77: 126–173. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, P., N. Verloop, and D. Beijaard. 1999. “Exploring Language Teachers’ Practical Knowledge about Teaching Reading Comprehension.” Teaching and Teacher Education 15 (1): 59–84. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)00045-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOE. 2012. “(People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Education).” Opinions on Deepening Teacher Education Reform, 12 February. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2012-12/13/content_2289684.htm
   Google Scholar
• Morselli, D., and A. Sannino. 2021. “Testing the Model of Double Stimulation in a Change Laboratory.” Teaching and Teacher Education 97 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2005. Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. Paris, FR: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., and K. Hakkarainen. 2005. “The Knowledge Creation Metaphor: An Emergent Epistemological Approach to Learning.” Science & Education 6 (6): 535–557. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-5157-0.
   Google Scholar
• Paavola, S., L. Lipponen, and K. Hakkarainen. 2004. “Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning.” Review of Educational Research 74 (4): 557–576. doi:10.3102/00346543074004557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. “Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective.” Qualitative Social Work 1 (3): 261–283. doi:10.1177/1473325002001003636.
   Google Scholar
• Roblin, N.N.P., B.J.B. Ormel, S.E. McKenney, J.M. Voogt, and J.M. Pieters. 2014. “Linking Research and Practice through Teacher Communities: A Place Where Formal and Practical Knowledge Meet?” European Journal of Teacher Education 37 (2): 183–203. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.882312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sannino, A., Y. Engeström, and M. Lemos. 2016. “Formative Interventions for Expansive Learning and Transformative Agency.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 25 (4): 599–633. doi:10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. 1987. “Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.” Harvard Educational Review 57 (19): 1–22. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2011. Interpreting Qualitative Data: A Guide to the Principles of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenkom, A., and I. Arievitch. 2004. “The Self in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory.” Theory and Psychology 14 (4): 475–503. doi:10.1177/0959354304044921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S.J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight a ‘Big Tent’ Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Driel, J. H., D. Beijaard, and N. Verloop. 2001. “Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers’ Practical Knowledge.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (2): 137–158. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tartwijk, J., P. den Brok, I. Veldman, and T. Wubbels. 2009. “Teachers’ Practical Knowledge about Classroom Management in Multicultural Classrooms.” Teaching and Teacher Education 25 (3): 453–460. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verloop, N., J. van Driel, and P. Meijer. 2001. “Teacher Knowledge and the Knowledge Base of Teaching.” International Journal of Educational Research 35 (5): 441–461. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Virkkunen, J., and D.S. Newnham. 2013. “.” In The Change Laboratory: A Tool for Collaborative Development of Work and Education. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G. 2020. Generation of Teacher Practical Knowledge. Beijing: Educational Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G., and X. Chen. 2018. “Emergence and Development of Research on Teacher Practical Knowledge.” Journal of East China Normal University 6: 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, G., and L. Lu. 2022. “Orientations of Preservice Teachers’ Practical Knowledge during School Placement: Concept Mapping as a Reflective Tool.” Reflective Practice 23 (3): 342–356. doi:10.1080/14623943.2021.2025354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, J., X. Zhu, and L. Lo. 2019. “Reform of Teacher Education in China: A Survey of Policies for Systemic Change.” Teachers and Teaching 25 (7): 757–781. doi:10.1080/13540602.2019.1639498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar