Developing digital academic skills in preservice teachers: performance and metacognitive perspectives

References

• Ackerman, R., and M. Goldsmith. 2011. “Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen versus on Paper.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17 (1): 18‏. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., A. Andresen, and I. Bråten. 2019. “Cognitive Load and Working Memory in Multimedia Learning: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Educational Psychologist 54 (2): 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2018.1554484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avvisati, F. 2014. “Digital learning in schools. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.” The OECD Observer 301:16. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/digital-learning-schools/docview/1774583205/se-2.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M. 2018. “Are Digital Natives Open to Change? Examining Flexible Thinking and Resistance to Change.” Computers & Education 121: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. 2015. Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A., J. Dunlosky, and N. Kornell. 2013. “Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions.” Annual Review of Psychology 64 (1): 417–444.‏ https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, I., S. Goldberg, A. Friedman, and Y. Eshet-Alkalai. 2020. “Violation of Digital and Analog Academic Integrity Through the Eyes of Faculty Members and Students: Do Institutional Role and Technology Change Ethical Perspectives?” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 33 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09260-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., and J.-F. Rouet. 2012. “Learning with Multiple Documents: Component Skills and Their Acquisition.” In Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Dispositions, Instruction, and Learning Processes, edited by J. R. Kirby and M. J. Lawson, 276–314. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. 2011. “Effects of Graphic Organizers on Student Achievement in the Writing Process.” Online Submission. Thesis. Southwestern College Professional Studies. 1–34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED527571.
   Google Scholar
• Carretero, S., R. Vuorikari, and Y. Punie. 2017. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use (No. JRC106281). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, K., L. Qigui, N. Gcora, J. Josie, L. Wenwei, and C. Fang. 2018. “Bridging the Digital Divide: Measuring Digital Literacy.” Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 12 (2018–23): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-23.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, S. J. 2020. “Education and the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Prospects 49 (1): 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delgado, P., C. Vargas, R. Ackerman, and L. Salmerón. 2018. “Don’t Throw Away Your Printed Books: A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Reading Media on Reading Comprehension.” Educational Research Review 25: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning, D., D. W. Griffin, J. D. Milojkovic, and L. Ross. 1990. “The Overconfidence Effect in Social Prediction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (4): 568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECLAC-UNESCO. (2020). Education in the Time of COVID-19. Covid-19 Report. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/S2000509_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eshet, Y. 2012. “Thinking in the Digital Era: A Revised Model for Digital Literacy.” Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 9 (2): 267–276. https://doi.org/10.28945/1621.
   Google Scholar
• Etgar, S., I. Blau, and Y. Eshet-Alkalai. 2019. “White-Collar Crime in Academia: Trends in Digital Academic Dishonesty Over Time and Their Effect on Penalty Severity.” Computers & Education 141: 103621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falloon, G. 2020. “From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework.” Educational Technology Research & Development 68 (5): 1–24.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., C. Lim, and J. Roll. 2016. “Book or Screen, Pen or Keyboard? A Cross-Cultural Sociological Analysis of Writing and Reading Habits Basing on Germany, Italy and the UK.” Telematics and Informatics 33 (2): 410–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Vandewalle García, J. M., M. García-Carmona, J. M. Trujillo Torres, and P. Moya Fernández. 2021. “Analysis of Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompedu) in Teacher Trainees: The Context of Melilla, Spain.” Technology, Knowledge and Learning 28 (2): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09546-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. 1983. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., K. A. Lawless, K. W. Gomez, J. L. G. Braasch, S. McLeod, and F. Manning. 2010. “Literacy in the Digital World: Comprehending and Learning from Multiple Sources.” In Bringing Reading Research to Life, edited by M. G. Mckeown and L. Kucan, 257–284. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Grangeia, T. D. A. G., B. de Jorge, D. Franci, T. M. Santos, M. S. V. Setubal, M. Schweller, M. A. de Carvalho-Filho, and E. Manalo. 2016. “Cognitive Load and Self-Determination Theories Applied to E-Learning: Impact on students’ Participation and Academic Performance.” Public Library of Science ONE 11 (3): e0152462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152462.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsdottir, G. B., and O. E. Hatlevik. 2018. “Newly Qualified teachers’ Professional Digital Competence: Implications for Teacher Education.” European Journal of Teacher Education 41 (2): 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, A. P., and G. Schraw. 2015. “Effects of Strategy Training and Incentives on students’ Performance, Confidence, and Calibration.” The Journal of Experimental Education 83 (3): 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, G. E., and R. Edwards. 2011. “Scaffolding to Improve Reading Comprehension and to Write a Scholarly Research Paper.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 1 (16): 30–36.
   Google Scholar
• Jairam, D., and K. A. Kiewra. 2010. “Helping Students Soar to Success on Computers: An Investigation of the SOAR Study Method for Computer-Based Learning.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (3): 601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniarti, K., and D. K. Sofyan, 2017. “The Effect of Using Graphic Organizer to Students’ Writing Ability.” Journal of English Education and Teaching 1 (1): 48–57‏. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.1.1.48-57.
   Google Scholar
• Kasperski, R., I. Blau, and G. Ben-Yehudah. 2022. “Teaching Digital Literacy: Are teachers’ Perspectives Consistent with Actual Pedagogy?.” Technology, Pedagogy & Education 31 (5): 615–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperski, R., and T. Katzir. 2013. “Are Confidence Ratings Test- or Trait-Driven?: Individual Differences Among High, Average, and Low Comprehenders in Fourth Grade.” Reading Psychology 34 (1): 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.580042.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., and P. De Bruyckere. 2017. “The Myths of the Digital Native and the Multitasker.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleider-Tesler, E., A. Prior, and T. Katzir. 2019. “The Role of Calibration of Comprehension in Adolescence: From Theory to Online Training.” Journal of Cognitive Education & Psychology 18 (2): 190–211. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.18.2.190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleitman, S., and L. Stankov. 2001. “Ecological and Person‐Oriented Aspects of Metacognitive Processes in Test‐Taking.” Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory & Cognition 15 (3): 321–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleitman, S., and L. Stankov. 2007. “Self-confidence and metacognitive processes.” Learning & Individual Differences 17 (2): 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y., Y. S. Seo, and L. Zhai. 2018. “Comparison of Reading Performance on Screen and on Paper: A Meta-Analysis.” Computers & Education 123: 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterman, T., and R. Ackerman. 2014. “Overcoming Screen Inferiority in Learning and Calibration.” Computers in Human Behavior 35: 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoli, P., and M. Papadopoulou. 2012. “Graphic Organizers as a Reading Strategy: Research Findings and Issues.” Creative Education 3 (3): 348. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., and B. Finn. 2008. “Evidence That Judgments of Learning are Causally Related to Study Choice.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (1): 174–179. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.1.174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel-Revilla, D., J. M. Martínez-Ferreira, and M. Sánchez-Agustí. 2020. “Assessing the Digital Competence of Educators in Social Studies: An Analysis in Initial Teacher Training Using the TPACK-21 Model.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 36 (2): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D., A. M. Salaz, S. Kurbanoglu, J. Boustany, and on behalf of the ARFIS Research Group. 2018. “Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors Among University Students Worldwide: A Comparative Survey Analysis.” Public Library of Science ONE 13 (5): e0197444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444.
   Google Scholar
• Napal Fraile, M., A. Peñalva-Vélez, and A. M. Mendióroz Lacambra. 2018. “Development of Digital Competence in Secondary Education Teachers’ Training.” Education Sciences 8 (3): 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. Are the New Millennium Learners Making the Grade? Technology Use and Educational Performance in PISA. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., and R. E. Mayer. 2014. “Qualitatively Different Cognitive Processing During Online Reading Primed by Different Study Activities.” Computers in Human Behavior 30: 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., R. E. Mayer, and M. J. Lopez. 2013. “A Computer-Based Spatial Learning Strategy Approach That Improves Reading Comprehension and Writing.” Educational Technology Research & Development 61:819–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce, H. R., R. E. Mayer, M. S. Loyola, and M. J. López. 2020. “Study Activities That Foster Generative Learning: Notetaking, Graphic Organizer, and Questioning.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 58 (2): 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regan, K., A. S. Evmenova, A. Boykin, D. Sacco, K. Good, S. Y. Ahn, N. MacVittie, and M. D. Hughes. 2017. “Supporting Struggling Writers with Class-Wide Teacher Implementation of a Computer-Based Graphic Organizer.” Reading & Writing Quarterly 33 (5): 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2016.1221781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., and T. D. Roedel. 1994. “Test difficulty and judgment bias.” Memory & Cognition 22 (1): 63–69.‏ https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., and J. A. Greene. 2017. “Historical, Contemporary, and Future Perspectives on Self-Regulated Learning and Performance.” In Handbook of self-regulation of learning andperformance, edited by D. H. Schunk and J. A. Greene, 19–35. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shamir-Inbal, T., and I. Blau. 2021. “Facilitating Emergency Remote K-12 Teaching in Computing-Enhanced Virtual Learning Environments During COVID-19 Pandemic-Blessing or Curse?” Journal of Educational Computing Research 59 (7): 1243–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633121992781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidi, Y., M. Shpigelman, H. Zalmanov, and R. Ackerman. 2017. “Understanding Metacognitive Inferiority on Screen by Exposing Cues for Depth of Processing.” Learning and Instruction 51: 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., and P. A. Alexander. 2017. “Reading Across Mediums: Effects of Reading Digital and Print Texts on Comprehension and Calibration.” Journal of Experimental Education 85 (1): 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2016.1143794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. 1997. Successful Intelligence. New York, USA: Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Tenney, E. R., N. L. Meikle, D. Hunsaker, D. A. Moore, and C. Anderson. 2019. “Is Overconfidence a Social Liability? The Effect of Verbal versus Nonverbal Expressions of Confidence.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 116 (3): 396. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorikari, R., Y. Punie, S. C. Gomez, and G. Van Den Brande. 2016. DigComp 2.0: The digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model (No. JRC101254). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, G. 2016. “Screen and Paper Reading Research – A Literature Review.” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 47 (3): 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1227661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W. H. 2014. “E-Books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Sharing and Use.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 46 (2): 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000612470279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar