The influence of ChatGPT on thinking skills and creativity of EFL student teachers: a narrative inquiry

References

• Asha, G. H., and K. Venkatesha. 2023. “Effectiveness of Life Skills Education on Creative Thinking Skill Among Student-Teachers of B. Ed. Programme.” IJFMR-International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2023.v05i01.1377.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. M., and A. Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., W. E. Hanson, V. L. Clark Plano, and A. Morales. 2007. “Qualitative Research Designs: Selection and Implementation.” The Counseling Psychologist 35 (2): 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006287390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crompton, H., M. Bernacki, and J. A. Greene. 2020. “Psychological Foundations of Emerging Technologies for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Current Opinion in Psychology 36:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwivedi, Y. K., N. Kshetri, L. Hughes, E. L. Slade, A. Jeyaraj, A. K. Kar, and R. Wright. 2023. ““So What if ChatGPT Wrote it?” Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy.” International Journal of Information Management 71:102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. 1985. The Educational Imagination: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Geng, J., and A. B. Razali. 2022. “Effectiveness of the Automated Writing Evaluation Program on Improving undergraduates’ Writing Performance.” English Language Teaching 15 (7): 49–60. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v15n7p49.
   Google Scholar
• Gobet, F., and G. Sala. 2019. “How Artificial Intelligence Can Help Us Understand Human Creativity.” Frontiers in Psychology 10:1401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-González, I., and A. I. Jiménez-Zarco. 2015. “Using Learning Methodologies and Resources in the Development of Critical Thinking Competency: An Exploratory Study in a Virtual Learning Environment.” Computers in Human Behavior 51:1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Personal Communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Halaweh, M. 2023. “ChatGpt in Education: Strategies for Responsible Implementation.” Contemporary Educational Technology 15 (2): ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W. C. H. 2023. “The Impact of ChatGPT on Foreign Language Teaching and Learning: Opportunities in Education and Research.” Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation 5 (1): 37–45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., S. Saleh, and Y. Liu. 2021. “A Review on Artificial Intelligence in Education.” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 10 (3): 206–206. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077.
   Google Scholar
• Kasneci, E., K. Seßler, S. Küchemann, M. Bannert, D. Dementieva, F. Fischer, and G. Kasneci. 2023. “ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education.” Learning and Individual Differences 103:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivunja, C. 2015. “Teaching Students to Learn and to Work Well with 21st Century Skills: Unpacking the Career and Life Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm.” International Journal of Higher Education 4 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p1.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan, D. 2010. “Contributions of English teachers’ Behaviours on students’ Creative Thinking Abilities.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2 (2): 5850–5854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.956.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, C., and H. Wildy. 2008. “Leading for Sustainability: Is Surface Understanding Enough?” Journal of Educational Administration 46 (5): 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810895528.
   Google Scholar
• Qadir, J. 2022. “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education.” TechRxiv. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.21789434.v1.
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J., S. Tan, and S. Tan. 2023. “ChatGPT: Bullshit Spewer or the End of Traditional Assessments in Higher Education?” Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Rushidi, J. 2013. “The Benefits and Downsides of Creative Methods of Teaching in an EFL Classroom: A Case Study Conducted at South East European University, Tetovo-Macedonia.” Benefits 4 (20): 128–135.
   Google Scholar
• Tias, I. W. U., A. Izzatika, and R. Perdana. 2022. “Empowerment of Critical and Creative Thinking (CCT) Skills Through Student Worksheets Based on Inquiry Social Complexity (ISC).” Wseas Transactions on Environment and Development 18:865–872. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.81.
   Google Scholar
• Trinidad, J. E. 2020. “Understanding Student-Centred Learning in Higher Education: Students’ and teachers’ Perceptions, Challenges, and Cognitive Gaps.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 44 (8): 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1636214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Maanen, J. 1988. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., and D. Kokotsaki. 2018. “Primary School teachers’ Conceptions of Creativity in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (EFL) in China.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 29:115–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, L., and P. Mertova. 2007. Using Narrative Inquiry as a Research Method. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946268.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W., B. Zhang, S. Li, and H. Liu. 2022. “Exploring Factors of the Willingness to Accept AI-Assisted Learning Environments: An Empirical Investigation Based on the UTAUT Model and Perceived Risk Theory.” Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharias, N. T. 2016. “Narrative Data and Analysis in Second Language Teaching and Learning.” Indonesian JELT 11 (2): 101–116. https://doi.org/10.25170/ijelt.v11i2.1492.
   Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., V. I. Marín, M. Bond, and F. Gouverneur. 2019. “Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education–Where are the Educators?” International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 16 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar