In and out of everyday life through film experiences: an analysis of two social spaces as leisure frames

References

• Aksan, N., Kısac, B., Aydın, M., & Demirbuken, S. (2009). Symbolic interaction theory. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 902–904. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.16010.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.160
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1984). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226040998.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H. S., Geer, B., Hughes, E. C., & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school (1977th ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1966). Sociological implications of the thought of George Herbert Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 71, 535–544.10.1086/224171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. P. (1988). Observations on the use of symbolic interactionism in leisure, recreation, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 550–552. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(88)90049-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis (1st ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, S. L., Plano Clark, V. L., Prochaska-Cue, K., Creswell, J. W., & Ontai-Grzebik, L. (2007). How rural low-income families have fun: A grounded theory study. Journal of Leisure Research, 39, 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coalter, F. (1997). Leisure sciences and leisure studies: Different concept, same crisis? Leisure Sciences, 19, 255–268.10.1080/01490409709512254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, C. (1988). Additional symbolic interactionism view on LRT. Annals of Tourism Research, 15, 552–554. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(88)90050-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colton, C. W. (1987). Leisure, recreation, tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 14, 345–360. doi:10.1016/0160-7383(87)90107-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1984). On understanding emotion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1996). The world of goods. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drotner, K. (2005). Media on the move: Personalized media and the transformation of publicness. Journal of Media Practice, 6, 53–64. doi:10.1386/jmpr.6.1.53/1
   Google Scholar
• Dupuis, S. L. (2000). Institution-based caregiving as a container for leisure. Leisure Sciences, 22, 259–280.10.1080/01490409950202294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis, S. L., & Smale, B. J. A. (2000). Bittersweet journeys: Meanings of leisure in the institution-based caregiving context. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 303–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (1988). Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. Sociological Theory, 6, 103–109. doi:10.2307/20191810.2307/201918
   Google Scholar
• Glancy, M., & Little, S. L. (1995). Studying the social aspects of leisure: Development of the multiple method field investigation model (MMFI). Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). Awareness of dying. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). Time for dying. New York, NY: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974/1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, P. (2003). A good night out? Multiplex cinemas as sites of embodied leisure. Leisure Studies, 22, 255–272.10.1080/026143603200075461
   Google Scholar
• Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1983). Towards a social psychology of recreational travel. Leisure Studies, 2, 45–56.10.1080/02614368300390041
   Google Scholar
• Iso-Ahola, S. E., & Allen, J. R. (1982). The dynamics of leisure motivation: The effects of outcome on leisure needs. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport, 53, 141–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iso-Ahola, S. E., Allen, J. R., & Buttimer, K. J. (1982). Experience related factors as determinants of leisure satisfaction. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 141–146. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1982.tb00424.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R. (1981). Leisure interaction and the social dialectic. Social Forces, 60, 304–322.10.1093/sf/60.2.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R. (1994). The symbolic interaction metaphor and leisure: critical challenges. Leisure Studies, 13, 81–96.10.1080/02614369400390061
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R. (1996). Leisure. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. R., & Kelly, J. R. (1994). Multiple dimensions of meaning in the domains of work, family, and leisure. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 250–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivel, D., Johnson, C., & Scraton, S. (2009). (Re)Theorizing leisure, experience and race. Journal of Leisure Research, 41, 473–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, D., Shamp, A. S., & Johnson, F. K. (1991). Video movies at home: Are they viewed like film or like television? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 68, 120–130.10.1177/107769909106800113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U. (2007). MAXQDA 2007 reference manual for Windows 2000 and XP (J. Poppe, Trans.). Marburg: Verbi Software.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C. (2001). The VCR, home video culture, and new technologies. In J. Bryant & A. Bryant (Eds.), Television and the American family (pp. 91–110). Mahgawh, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2003). The changing nature of audiences: From the mass audience to the interactive media user. In A. Valdivia (Ed.), A companion to media studies (pp. 337–359). London: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470999066
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2006). Drawing conclusions from new media research: Reflections and puzzles regarding children’s experience of the internet. The Information Society, 22, 219–230. doi:10.1080/01972240600791358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2007a). From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. In E. Devereux (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 302–321). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2007b). On the material and the symbolic: Silverstone’s double articulation of research traditions in new media studies. New Media Society, 9, 16–24.10.1177/1461444807075200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1962). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neulinger, J. (1974). The psychology of leisure. Springfield, IL: C. C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Neulinger, J., & Breit, M. (1969). Attitude dimensions of leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 1, 255–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, S., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Consuming with others: Social influences on moment-to-moment and retrospective evaluations of an experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 506–524.10.1086/520074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, N., Chua, S., & Wee, L. K. (2001). Going to the movies: Cinema development in Singapore. Leisure Studies, 20, 215–232.10.1080/02614360127118
   Google Scholar
• Samdahl, D. (1988). A symbolic interactionist model of leisure: Theory and empirical support. Leisure Sciences, 10, 27–39.10.1080/01490408809512174
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, S. M. (1985). The meaning of leisure in everyday life. Leisure Sciences, 7(1), 1–24.10.1080/01490408509512105
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, L. (2002). The active audience: Spectatorship, social relations and the experience of cinema in India. Media, Culture and Society, 24, 155–173.10.1177/016344370202400201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511557842
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Unger, L. S., & Kernan, J. (1983). On the meaning of leisure: An investigation of some determinants of the subjective experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 382–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1899). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, M., & Bond, C. (2007). Ways of experiencing leisure. Leisure Sciences, 29, 287–307.10.1080/01490400701259985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, C., Strauss, A., Fagerhaugh, S., & Suczek, B. (1979). Trajectories, biographies and the evolving medical technology scene: Labor and delivery and the intensive care nursery. Sociology of Health & Illness, 1, 261–283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.1979.tb00189.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, D. R., Roggenbuck, J. W., Patterson, M. E., & Watson, A. E. (1992). The variability of user-based social impact standards for wilderness management. Forest Science, 38, 738–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar