10,285
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Becoming horseboy(s) – human-horse relations and intersectionality in equiscapes

Pages 408-421 | Received 28 Sep 2018, Accepted 13 Feb 2019, Published online: 26 Feb 2019

References

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of wow matter comes to matter. Signs, 28a(3), 801–831.
  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Barker-Ruchti, N. (2008). ”They must be working hard”: An (Auto-)ethnographic account of women´s artistic gymnastics. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 8, 372–380.
  • Berbary, L., & Johnson, C. (2012). The American sorority girl recast: An ethnographic screenplay of leisure in context. Leisure/Loisir, 36(4), 243–268.
  • Berggren, K. (2013). Degrees of intersectionality: Male rap artists in Sweden negotiating class, race and gender. Culture Unbound, 5, 189–211.
  • Birke, L., & Brandt, K. (2009). Mutual corporeality: Gender and human/horse relationships. Womens Studies International Forum, 32, 331–347.
  • Birke, L., Bryld, M., & Lykke, N. (2004). Animal performances. An exploration of intersections between feminist science studies and studies of human/animal relationships. Feminist Theory, 5(2), 167–183.
  • Brandt, K. (2004). A language of their own: An interactionist approach to human-horse communication. Society & Animals, 12(4), 299–316.
  • Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge & Malden: Polity Press.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins. Intersectionality identity politics and violence against women of colour. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
  • Dahl, U. (2012). The road to writing. An ethno(bio)graphic memoir. In M. Livholts (Ed.), Emergent writing methodologies in feminist studies (pp. 148–165)). New York: Routledge.
  • Dashper, K. (2016). Strong, active women: (Re)doing rural femininity through equestrian sport and leisure. Ethnography, 17(3), 350–368.
  • Dashper, K. (2017). Human-animal relationships in equestrian sport and leisure. New York: Routledge.
  • Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as a buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
  • Dowling, F., Garrett, R., Lisahunter,, & Wrench, A. (2015). Narrative inquiery in physical education research: The story so far and its future promise. Sport, Education & Society
  • Finkel, R., & Danby, P. (2018). Legitimizing leisure experiences as emotional work: A post humanist approach to gendered equine encounters. Gender Work & Organization, 1–15.
  • Game, A. (2001). Riding: Embodying the centaur. Body & Society, 7(4), 1–12.
  • Giardina, M. (2017). (Post?)Qualitative inquiry in sport, exercise, and health: Notes on a methodologically contested present. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(2), 258–270.
  • Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
  • Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hedenborg, S., & Hedenborg White, M. (2012). Changes and variations in patterns of gender relations in equestrian sports during the second half of the twentieth century. Sport in Society, 15(3), 302–319.
  • Ken, I. (2007). Race-class-gender theory: An image(ry) problem. Gender Issues, 24(2), 1–20.
  • Kuby, C. R., Aguayo, R. C., Holloway, N., Mulligan, J., Shear, S. B., & Ward, A. (2015). Teaching, troubling, transgressing: Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(2), 140–148.
  • Kuchinkas, S. (2009). Chemistry of connection: How the oxytocin response can help you find trust, intimacy, and love. Oakland: New Harbinger Publications.
  • Linghede, E., Larsson, H., & Redelius, K. (2015). (Re)presenting equestrian histories – Storytelling as a method of inquiry. Sport, Education and Society, 21, 82–95.
  • Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg: Crossing Press.
  • Lykke, N. (2010). Feminist studies: A guide to intersectional theory, methodology and writing. New York: Routledge.
  • Maurstad, A., & Davis, D. (Eds). (2016). The meaning of horses: Biosocial encounters. London: Routledge.
  • Messner, M. (1995). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Mohanty, C. (1988). Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30, 61–88.
  • Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1983). This bridge called my back. Writings by radical women of colour. New York: Kitchen Table.
  • Plymoth, B. (2012). Gender in equestrian sports: An issue of difference and equality. Sport in Society, 15(3), 335–348.
  • Pyyhtinen, O. (2016). More-than-human sociology: A new sociological imagination. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Richardson, L., & Adams St. Pierre, E. (2005). Writing. A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 959–978). London: Sage Publications.
  • Richardsson, L. (1992). The consequenses of poetic representation: Writing on the other, rewriting the self. In C. Ellis & M. Flathery (Eds.), Windows on lived experience (pp. 125–140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Sparkes, A. (1997). Ethnographic fiction and representing the absent other. Sport, Education and Society, 2, 25–40.
  • Sparkes, A., Nilges, L., Swan, P., & Dowling, F. (2003). Poetic representations in sport and physical education: Insider perspectives 1. Sport, Education and Society, 8, 153–177.
  • Watson, B., & Scraton, S. (2013). Leisure studies and intersectionality. Leisure Studies, 32(1), 35–47.
  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. Hampshire: Aschgate.