A predator in the park: mixed methods analysis of user preference for coyotes in urban parks

References

• Alexander, S. M., & Quinn, M. S. (2011). Coyote (Canis latrans) interactions with humans and pets reported in the Canadian print media (1995–2010). Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 16(5), 345–359.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, S. M., & Quinn, M. S. (2012). Portrayal of interactions between humans and coyotes (Canis latrans): Content analysis of Canadian print media (1998–2010). Cities and the Environment (CATE), 4(1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Arechar, A., Kraft-Todd, G. T., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Turking overtime: How participant characteristics and behavior vary over time and day on Amazon mechanical turk. Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2836946
   Google Scholar
• Atwood, T. C., Weeks, H. P., Gehring, T. M., & White, J. (2004). Spatial ecology of coyotes along a suburban-to-rural gradient. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68(4), 1000–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. O., & Timm, R. M. (1998). Management of conflicts between urban coyotes and humans in southern California. Hopland Research & Extension Center.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R. O., & Timm, R. M. (2017). Coyote attacks on humans, 1970–2015: Implications for reducing the risks. Human-Wildlife Interactions, 11(2), 120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barmann, J. (2016, January 12). Wild coyotes now roaming Haight, Panhandle. Retrieved from http://sfist.com/2016/01/12/wild_coyotes_now_roaming_haight_pan.php
   Google Scholar
• Batey, E. (2014, June 27). How much of a threat are San Francisco coyote’s? Retrieved from http://sfist.com/2014/06/27/stay_frosty_san_franciscos_populati.php
   Google Scholar
• Batey, E. (2016, March 18). Fatal attacks spur city hall meeting on SF’s coyote response plan. Retrieved from http://sfist.com/2016/03/18/are_coyote_attacks_on_the.php
   Google Scholar
• Bekoff, M., & Gese, E. M. (2003). Coyote (Canis latrans). In G. A. Feldhamer, B. C. Thompson, & J. A. Chapman (Eds.), Wild mammals of North America: Biology, management, and conservation (2nd ed., pp. 467–481). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bounds, D. L., & Shaw, W. W. (1994). Managing coyotes in US National Parks: Human-coyote interactions. Natural Areas Journal, 14(4), 280–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and semi-structured. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 277–299). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carbyn, L. N. (1989). Coyote attacks on children in western North America. Wildlife Society Bulletin (1973–2006), 17(4), 444–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999). Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature, 400(6744), 563–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedriani, J. M., Fuller, T. K., & Sauvajot, R. M. (2001). Does availability of anthropogenic food enhance densities of omnivorous mammals? An example with coyotes in southern California. Ecography, 24(3), 325–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimrite, P. (2015, September 17). S.F. neighborhood on edge after coyote pack moves in, kills cats. SF Chronicle. Retrieved from http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/S-F-neighborhood-on-edge-after-coyote-pack-moves-6512264.php
   Google Scholar
• Galante, G., (photographer). (2018). Urban coyote
   Google Scholar
• Gehrt, S. D. (2004). Ecology and management of striped skunks, raccoons, and coyotes in urban landscapes. In N. Fascione, A. Delach, & M. Smith (Eds.), People and predators: From conflict to coexistence (pp. 81–104). Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrt, S. D., Anchor, C., & White, L. A. (2009). Home range and landscape use of coyotes in a metropolitan landscape: Conflict or coexistence? Journal of Mammalogy, 90(5), 1045–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrt, S. D., Wilson, E. C., Brown, J. L., & Anchor, C. (2013). Population ecology of free-roaming cats and interference competition by coyotes in urban parks. PloS one, 8(9), 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, S. L., & Crooks, K. R. (2006). Recreation and large mammal activity in an urban nature reserve. Biological Conservation, 133(1), 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilchrist, J., Gotsch, K., Annest, J. L., & Ryan, G. (2003). Nonfatal dog bite: Related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments-United States 2001. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 56(26), 605–610.
   Google Scholar
• Gompper, M. E. (2002). Top carnivores in the suburbs? Ecological and conservation issues raised by colonization of North eastern North America by coyotes. BioScience, 52(2), 185–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinder, M. I., & Krausman, P. R. (2001). Home range, habitat use, and nocturnal activity of coyotes in an urban environment. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 65(4), 887–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, S. E., & Krausman, P. R. (2009a). Observations of coyote–Cat interactions. Journal of Wildlife Management, 73(5), 683–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubbs, S. E., & Krausman, P. R. (2009b). Use of urban landscape by coyotes. Southwestern Naturalist, 54(1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, R. G. (1982). The urban coyote problem in Los Angeles County. Paper presented at the Tenth Vertebrate Pest Conference, Davis, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Jerolmack, C. (2008). How pigeons became rats: The cultural-spatial logic of problem animals. Social Problems, 55(1), 72–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellert, S. R. (1985). Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote. Biological Conservation, 31(2), 167–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenaga, B. A., Krebs, R. A., & Clapham Jr, W. B. (2013). Coyote land use inside and outside urban parks. American Midland Naturalist, 170(2), 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, J. (2016). Coyote yipps: A blog about San Francisco coyotes. Retrieved from https://coyoteyipps.com/
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14(1–2), 171–196.
   Google Scholar
• Loring, K. (2015, February 23). In San Francisco, coyotes are your wildest neighbors. KALW Local Public Radio. Retrieved from http://kalw.org/post/san-francisco-coyotes-are-your-wildest-neighbors
   Google Scholar
• Moll, R. J., Cepek, J. D., Lorch, P. D., Dennis, P. M., Robison, T., Millspaugh, J. J., & Montgomery, R. A. (2018). Humans and urban development mediate the sympatry of competing carnivores. Urban Ecosystems, 21, 765–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, P. S., Gese, E. M., & Gehrt, S. (2007). Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area. American Midland Naturalist, 158(1), 147–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. A., Drake, D., & Allen, M. L. (2018). Coexistence of coyotes (Canis latrans) and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in an urban landscape. PloS one, 13(1), e0190971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presser, S., Couper, M. P., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., & Singer, E. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. D. (1998). The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3), 352–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. (1997). Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. E., & Merenlender, A. M. (2011). Effects of management of domestic dogs and recreation on carnivores in protected areas in northern California. Conservation Biology, 25(3), 504–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J. (2017). Cleansing public nature: Landscapes of homelessness, health, and displacement. Journal of Political Ecology, 24, 11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, J., & Wilson, J. (in press). Assembling homelessness: A posthumanist political ecology approach to urban parks, nature, wildlife, and actor-networks. Leisure Sciences. doi:10.1080/02614367.2019.1586979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford, S. (2018). The Anthropocene’s animal? Coywolves as feral cotravelers. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1–2), 206–223.
   Google Scholar
• Shargo, E. S. (1988). Home range, movements, andactivity patterns of coyotes (Canis latrans) in LosAngeles suburbs ( Ph.D. Dissertation). UCLA, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Stienstra, T. (2014, March 27). Coyotes seemingly thrive in San Francisco. Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/outdoors/article/Coyotes-seemingly-thrive-in-San-Francisco-5045034.php
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. E. (1999). Central Park as a model for social control: Urban parks, social class and leisure behavior in nineteenth-century America. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(4), 420–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, R. M. (2006). Coyotes nipping at our heels: A new suburban dilemma. Paper presented at the Triennial Naiotnal Wildlife & Fisheries Extension Specialists Conference, Big Sky, MT.
   Google Scholar
• Timm, R. M., & Baker, R. O. (2007). A history of urban coyote problems. Paper presented at the Wildlife Damage Management Conferences, Corpus Christi, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Vaske, J. J., & Needham, M. D. (2007). Segmenting public beliefs about conflict with coyotes in an urban recreation setting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 25(4), 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. C. (2007). Missing cats, stray coyotes: One citizen’s perspective. Paper presented at the Wildlife Damage Management Conferences, Corpus Christi, TX.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. A., & Gehrt, S. D. (2009). Coyote attacks on humans in the United States and Canada. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 14(6), 419–432.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. D., Yoshino, A., & Latkova, P. (2018). Off-leash recreation in an urban national recreation area: Conflict between domesticated dogs, wildlife, and semi-domesticated humans. In J. Young & N. Carr (Eds.), Domestic animals, humans, and leisure (pp. 63–81). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wolch, J. (2002). Anima urbis. Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), 721–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar