References
- Adams, M., & Guy, S. (2007). Editorial: Senses and the city. Senses & Society, 2(2), 133–136.
- Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Amar, P. (2018). Military capitalism. NACLA Report on the Americas, 50(1), 82–89.
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytical tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
- Bates, C., & Rhys-Taylor, A. (2017). Finding our feet. In C. Bates & A. Rhys-Taylor (Eds.), Walking through social research. London: Routledge.
- Braathen, E., Mascarenha, G., & Sorboe, C. M. (2016). A ‘city of exception?’ Rio de Janeiro and the disputed social legacy of the 2014 and 2016 sports mega-events. In V. Viehoff & G. Poynter (Eds.), Mega event cities: Urban legacies of global sport events (pp. 261–270). London: Routledge.
- Broudehoux, A.-M., & Sanchez, F. (2015). The politics of mega event planning in Rio de Janeiro: Contesting the Olympic city of exception. In V. Viehoff & G. Poynter (Eds.), Mega event cities: Urban legacies of global sport events (pp. 109–123). London: Routledge.
- Cade, N., Everett, S., & Duignan, M. B. (2019). Leveraging digital and physical spaces to ‘de-risk’ and access Rio’s favela communities. Tourism Geographies, 1. doi:10.1080/14616688.2019.1571099
- Coaffee, J. (2015). The uneven geographies of the Olympic carceral: From exceptionalism to normalisation. The Geographical Journal, 181(3), 199–211.
- Dansero, E., Mela, A., & Rossignolo, C. (2015). Legacies of Turin 2006 eight years on: Theories on territorialization in the aftermath of the Olympic Games. In V. Viehoff & G. Poynter (Eds.), Mega event cities: Urban legacies of global sport events (pp. 99–107). London: Routledge.
- de Almeida, B.S., Bolsmann, C., Júnior, W.M., & de Souza, J. (2015). Rationales, rhetoricand realities: FIFA’s World Cup in South Africa 2010 and brazil 2014. International Review for The Sociology Of Sport, 50(3), 265–282
- De Lisio, A., Hubbard, P., & Silk, M. (2018). Economies of (Alleged) deviance: Sex work and the sport mega-event. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. doi:10.1007/s13178-018-0319-z
- Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
- Duignan, M. B. (2019). London’s local Olympic legacy: Small business displacement, ‘Clone Town’ effect and the production of ‘Urban blandscapes’. Journal of Place Management and Development. doi:10.1108/JPMD-05-2018-0033)
- Duignan, M. B., & McGillivray, D. (2019). Walking methodologies, digital platforms and the interrogation of Olympic Spaces the ‘#RioZones-Approach’. Tourism Geographies. doi:10.1080/14616688.2019.1586988
- Duignan, M. B., & Pappalepore, I. (2019). Visitor (im)mobility, leisure consumption and mega event impact: The territorialisation of Greenwich and small business exclusion at the London 2012 Olympics. Leisure Studies, 38(2), 160–174.
- Duignan, M. B., Pappalepore, I., & Everett, S. (2019). The ‘Summer of discontent’ - Exclusion and communal resistance at the London 2012 Olympics. Tourism Management, 70, 355–367.
- Edensor, T. (1998). The culture of the Indian street. In N. Fyfe (Ed.), Images of the street: Planning, identity and control in public space. (pp. 205–217) London: Routledge.
- Frew, M., & McGillivray, D. (2008). Exploring hyper-experiences: Performing the fan at Germany 2006. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 13(3), 181–198.
- Gaffney, C. (2015). Gentrifications in pre-Olympic Rio de Janeiro. Urban Geography, 37(8), 1132–1153.
- Giulianotti, R., Armstrong, G., Hales, G., & Hobbs, D. (2015). Global sport mega-events and the politics of mobility: The case of the London 2012 Olympics. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(4), 118–140.
- Gruneau, R., & Horne, J. (eds). (2015). Mega-events and globalization: Capital and spectacle in a changing world order. London: Routledge.
- Hall, C. M. (2006). Urban entrepreneurship, corporate interests and sports mega-events: The thin policies of competitiveness within the hard outcomes of neoliberalism. Sociological Review, 54, 59–70.
- Ingold, T., & Vergunst, J. L. (2008). Ways of walking: Ethnography and practice on foot. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Jakob, D. (2013). The eventification of place: Urban development and experience consumption in Berlin and New York City. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(4), 447–459.
- Jennings, W. (2010). Governing the Games in an age of uncertainty: The Olympics and organisational responses to risk. In A. Richards, P. Fussey, & A. Silke (Eds.), Terrorism and the Olympics: Major event security and lessons for the future (pp. 135–162). London: Routledge.
- Kirby, S. I., Duignan, M. B., & McGillivray, D. (2018). Mega-sport events, micro and small business leveraging: Introducing the “MSE-MSE leverage model”. Event Management, 22(6), 917–931.
- Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485.
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. London: Sage.
- Marrero-Guillamón, I. (2013). Olympic state of exception. In H. Powell & I. Marrero- Guillamón (Eds.), The art of dissent: Adventures in London’s Olympic state (pp. 1–13). London: Marshgate.
- Marshall, C., & Rossman Gretchen, B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- McGillivray, D., Duignan, M. B., & Mielke, E. (2019). Mega sport events and spatial management: Zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city. Annals of Leisure Research. doi:10.1080/11745398.2019.1607509
- McGillivray, D., & Frew, M. (2015). From fan parks to live sites: Mega events and the territorialisation of urban space. Urban Studies, 52(14), 2649–2663.
- Muller, M. (2015). The mega-event syndrome: Why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(1), 6–17.
- Pappalepore, I., & Duignan, M. B. (2016). The London 2012 cultural programme: A consideration of Olympic impacts and legacies for small creative organisations in East London. Tourism Management, 54(3), 344–355.
- Paton, K., Mooney, G., & McKee, K. (2012). Class, citizenship and regeneration: Glasgow and the Commonwealth Games 2014. Antipode, 44(4), 1470–1489.
- Pavoni, A. (2015). Resistant legacies. Annals of Leisure Research, 18(4), 470–490.
- Pavoni, A. (2017). Controlling Urban events. London: Routledge.
- Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2015). Ethnography in a digital world, digital ethnography: Principles and practice. London: Sage.
- Raco, M., & Tunney, E. (2010). Visibilities and invisibilities in urban development: Small business communities and the London Olympics 2012. Urban Studies, 47(10), 2069–2091.
- Rio 2016. (2009) Candidature documentation [Vol. 1]. Retrieved from https://www.rio2016.com/transparencia/en/documents
- Silk, M., & Amis, J. (2006). Bursting the Tourist Bubble: Sport and the spectacularization of Urban space. In H. Gibson (Ed.), Sport tourism: Paradigms and theories (pp. 148–169). London: Frank Cass.
- Silk, M. (2014). The London 2012 Olympics: The cultural politics of urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 1(2), 273–294.
- Smith, A. (2016). Events in the city: Using public spaces as event venues. London: Routledge.
- Stewart, A., & Rayner, S. (2016). Planning mega-event legacies: Uncomfortable knowledge for host cities. Planning Perspectives, 31(2), 157–179.
- The Wall Street Journal. (2016) No-show volunteers, food shortages add to Brazil’s problems at Rio Games. Retrieved from https://www.wsj.com/articles/brazil-earns-mixed-scores-for-rio-games-1470934919
- Vainer, C. B. (2015). Mega-events and the city of exception: Theoretical explanations of the Brazilian experience. In R. Gruneau & J. Horne (Eds.), Mega-events and Globalization: Capital and spectacle in a changing world order (pp. 97–112). London: Routledge.
- VisitRio (2016, August 13) Live site marvelous port: An overview. Retrieved from http://visit.rio/en/editorial/livesitemarvelousport/
- Zimbalist, A. (2015). Circus maximus: The economic gamble behind hosting the olympics and the world cup. Washington: Brookings.