The role of voluntary sport organisations in leveraging the London 2012 sport participation legacy

References

• Bocarro, J., Byers, T., & Carter, C. (2018). Legacy of sporting and non-sporting mega event research. In I. Brittain, J. Bocarro, T. Byers, & K. Swart (Eds.), Legacies and mega-events: Facts or fairy tales? (pp. 7–24). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bretherton, P., Piggin, J., & Bodet, G. (2016). Olympic sport and physical activity promotion: The rise and fall of the London 2012 pre-event mass participation ‘legacy’. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(4), 609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain, I., Bocarro, J., Byers, T., & Swart, K. (Eds.). (2018). Legacies and mega events: Fact or fairy tales? Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., & Pappous, A. (2018). “The legacy element … It just felt more woolly”: Exploring the reasons for the decline in people with disabilities’ sport participation in England 5 years after the London 2012 paralympic games. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 42(5), 343–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byers, T., Hayday, E., & Pappous, A. S. (2019). A new conceptualization of mega sports event legacy delivery: Wicked problems and critical realist solution. Sport Management Review. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalip, L. (2017). Event bidding, legacy, and leverage. In R. Hoye & M. M. Parent (Eds.), The sage handbook of sport management (pp. 401–421). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L. (2018). Trading legacy for leverage. In I. Brittain, J. Bocarro, T. Byers, & K. Swart (Eds.), Legacies and mega events: Fact or fairy tales? Oxon: Routlegde, pp.25-41.
   Google Scholar
• Chalip, L., Green, B. C., Taks, M., & Misener, L. (2017). Creating sport participation from sport events: Making it happen. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(2), pp. 257–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corfe, E. (2014). ‘Voluntary sector sees “revolving door” of staff, says report’ [nline] Retrieved from http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/governance/news/content/18400/voluntary_sector_sees_revolving_door_of_staff
   Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• DCMS. (2012). Creating a sporting habit for life. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte & Touche. (2003). Investing in change- high level review of the modernisation programme for national governing bodies of sport. London: UK Sport.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (1979). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94(4), 601–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewalt, J. A. G., & Jennings, E. T. (2004). Administration, governance, and policy tools in welfare policy implementation. Public Administration Review, 64(4), 449–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, S., & Guala, C. (2017). Mega-events and their legacy: Image and tourism in Genoa, Turin and Milan. Leisure Studies, 36(1), 119–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girginov, V. (2011). Goverance of the London 2012 Olympic Games legacy.International Review for the sociology of sport. 47(5), pp.543-558.
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V., & Hills, L. (2008). A sustainable sports legacy: Creating a link between the London Olympics and sports participation. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 2091–2116.
   Google Scholar
• Girginov, V., Peshin, N., & Belousov, L. (2017). Leveraging mega events for capacity building in voluntary sport organisations. VOLUNTAS, 28(5), 2081–2102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester, J. P., & O’Toole, L. J. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., & Grix, J. (2011). Bringing structures back in: The ‘governance narrative’, the ‘decentred approach’ and ‘asymmetrical network governance’ in the education and sport policy communities. Public Administration, 89(2), 537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, C., & Jones, I. (2004). Research methods for sports studies. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J., Brannagan, M., Wood, H., & Wynne, C. (2017). State strategies for leveraging sports megaevents: Unpacking the concept of ‘legacy’. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(2), 203–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gursoy, D., & Kendall, K. W. (2006). Hosting mega events: Modeling locals’ support. Annals of Tourism Research, 33(3), 603–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayday, E. J., Pappous, A., & Koutrou, N. (2017). Leveraging the sport participation legacy of the London 2012 Olympics: Senior managers’ perceptions. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(2), 349–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, I., & Theodoraki, E. (2000). Management, organizations and theory in the governance of sport. In J. Coakley & E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of sports studies. pp.490-504. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2009). Implementing public policy (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hindson, A., Gidlow, B., & Peebles, C. (1994). The ‘trickle-down’ effect of top-level sport: Myth or reality? A case-study of the olympics. Australian Journal of Leisure and Recreation, 4(1), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hjern, B., & Hull, C. (1982). Implementation research as empirical constitutionalism. European Journal of Political Research, 10(2), 105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Lords (2013) Keeping the flame alive: The olympic and paralympic legacy. Select Committee on Olympic and Paralympic Legacy. Report of session 2013-14. London: the stationery Office Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, K. (2013) Sport mega-event and a legacy of increased sport participation: An Olympic promise or an Olympic dream? PhD Thesis, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK, pp.1–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplanidou, K., & Karadakis, K. (2010). Understanding the legacies of a host olympic city: The case of the 2010 Vancouver olympic games. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 19(2), 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, T. (1996) Just do it? Turning sport policy into sports practice. Managing Leisure 1(4), pp.233-247.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellberg,F., & Reitan, M. (1995). Studiet av offentlig politikk [The study of public policy]. Oslo: Tano
   Google Scholar
• Kokolakakis, T., Lera-López, F., & Ramchandani, G. (2018). Did London 2012 deliver a sports participation legacy? Sport Management Review. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2018.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lovett, E., & Bloyce, D. (2017). What happened to the legacy from London 2012? A sociological analysis of the processes involved in preparing for a grassroots sporting legacy from London 2012 outside of the host city. Sport in Society, 20(11), 1625–1643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae, E. H. (2017). Delivering sports participation legacies at the grassroots level: The voluntary sports clubs of glasgow 2014. Journal of Sport Management, 31(1), 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Smith, M. (2001). There is more than one way to do political science: On different ways to study policy networks. Political Studies, 49, 528–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5, 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• May, T., Harris, S., & Collins, M. (2013). Implementing community sport policy: Understanding the variety of voluntary club types and their attitudes to policy. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(3), 397–419.
   Google Scholar
• O’Gorman, J. (2011). Where is the implementation in sport policy and programme analysis? The english football association’s charter standard as an illustration. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(1), 85–108.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual (6th ed.). UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pappous, A., & Hayday, E. J. (2016). A case study investigating the impact of the London 2012 olympic and paralymic games on participation in two non-traditional English sports, Judo and Fencing. Leisure Studies, 35, 668–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potwarka, L. R., & Leatherdale, S. T. (2016). The Vancouver 2010 Olympics and leisure-time physical activity rates among youth in Canada: Any evidence of a trickle-down effect? Leisure Studies, 35(2), 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss, H. (2007). The conceptualisation and measurement of mega sport event legacies. Journal of Sport and Tourism, 12, 207–228.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss, H. (2014). Legacy revisited. In J. Grix (Ed.), Leveraging legacies for sports megaevents: Concepts and cases (pp. 24–38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss, H. (2015). A framework for identifying the legacies of a mega sport event. Leisure Studies, 34(6), 643–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preuss, H. (2018). Foreword, legacy research in the 21st Century. In Brittain, I, Boccaro, J, Byers, T, and Swart, K. (eds.) Legacies and mega events: Fact or fairy tales? (pp. 20–24). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchandani, G., Coleman, R., & Christy, E. (2017). The sport participation legacy of major events in the UK. Health Promotion International, 34(1), 82–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, A. C., Frawley, S., Hodgetts, D., Thomson, A., & Hughes, K. (2017). Sport participation legacy and the olympic games: The case of Sydney 2000, London 2012, and Rio 2016. Event Management, 21(2), 139–158.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, B. W., Shipway, R., & Cleeve, B. (2009). Resident perceptions of mega-sporting events: A non-host city perspective of the 2012 London Olympic Games. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 14(2–3), 143–167.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha, C. M. (2015). Support of politicians for the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro. Leisure Studies, 35(4), 487–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, M. (2017). Mega-events and social change: Spectacle, legacy and public culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1983). Policy implementation. In Stuart, N. (eds.) Encyclopedia of policy sciences. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Skille, E. Å. (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers: A theoretical framework for the analysis of the implementation of central sport policy through local and voluntary sport organizations. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(2), 181–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2008). ‘Sport England Strategy 2008-11ʹ. London: Author. [ Online]. Retrieved from http://www.lsersa.org/sse/sportstrategies/SportEnglandStrategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sport England. (2016a). National governing body 2013/17 whole sport plan and investment guidance. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sport England (2016b) Sport England: Towards an active nation strategy 2017-2021 [Online] Available at: https://www.sportengland.org/media/10629/sport-england-towards-an-active-nation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. P. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Taks, M., Chalip, L., & Green, B. C. (2015). Impacts and strategic outcomes from non-mega sport events for local communities. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taks, M., Green, B. C., Misener, L., & Chalip, L. (2018). Sport participation from sport events: Why it doesn’t happen? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(2), 185–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A., Cuskelly, G., Toohey, K., Kennelly, M., Burton, P., & Fredline, L. (2018). Sport event legacy: A systematic quantitative review of literature. Sport Management Review, 22(3), 295-321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process a conceptual framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 445–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed, M. (2018). Sports participation legacies of mega sporting events. In I. Brittain, J. Bocarro, T. Byers, & K. Swart (Eds.), pp.79-97. Legacies and mega events: Fact or fairy tales? Oxon: Routlegde.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, M., Coren, E., Fiore, J., Wellard, I., Chatziefstathiou, D., Mansfield, L., & Dowse, S. (2015). The Olympic Games and raising sport participation: A systematic review of evidence and an interrogation of policy for a demonstration effect. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15(2), 195–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C. (2007). Implementation perspectives, status and reconsideration. In B. Guy Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The handbook of public administration, Concise paperback edition (pp. 131–141). New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar