Different ways to craft and use social media in crafting

References

• Abbott, M. L., & McKinney, J. (2013). Understanding and applying research design. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Arora, P. (2011). Online social sites as virtual parks: An investigation into leisure online and offline. The Information Society, 27(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.548702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, A., & Anthony, P. (2016). Social media communication in the artisan economy. International Journal of Mobile Computing and Multimedia Communications, 7(3), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMCMC.2016070103
   Google Scholar
• Best, S. J., & Harrison, C. H. (2009). Internet survey methods. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods. Chapter 13. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348858
   Google Scholar
• Bryan-Kinns, N., Liu, Y., Tan, H., Tan, Z., Zhang, D., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Digital platforms for craft; in the UK and China. Final Report. http://craftplatforms.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Digital-Platforms-for-Craft.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative data analysis with IBM SPSS 17, 18 & 19: A guide for social scientists. Routledge. https://ezproxy.uef.fi:2443/10.4324/9780203180990
   Google Scholar
• Budge, K. (2012). Art and design blogs: A socially-wise approach to creativity. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2012.01713.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court, K. (2020). Knitting two together (k2tog), “if you meet another knitter you always have a friend. Textile-The Journal of Cloth & Culture, 18(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759756.2019.1690838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. (2018). Research design : Qualitative, quantitative & mixed methods approaches. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dormer, P. (1994). The art of the maker. Thames and Hudson Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Eddington, S., & Jarvis, C. (2022). Expertise, knowledge, and resilience in #academic twitter: Enacting resilience‐craft in a community of practice. Media and Communication, 10(2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i2.5053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwistle, J., & Wissinger, E. (2023). Dress like a mum/mom: Instagram style mums and the fashionable ideal. Fashion Theory, 27(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2021.1934326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connecting: The social meaning of craftivity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and web 2.0. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney, F. (2013). Quiet activism and the new amateur. Design and Culture, 5(2), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470813X13638640370733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanen, T., Myllyniemi, S., & Salasuo, M. (2019). Oikeus liikkua - lasten ja nuorten vapaa-aikatutkimus 2018 [Right to move - children and youth leisure time research]. Valtion nuorisoneuvoston julkaisuja.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, K., Greenhill, A., & McLean, R. (2014). Creating communities: The use of technology in craft and DIY communities of practice. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 16(4), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-05-2013-0018
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, K., McLean, R., Green, G., & Delerue, H. (2012). Crafting a future online: A study of how independent craftspeople adopt social media and web technologies. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 14(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211232162
   Google Scholar
• Jakob, D. (2012). Crafting your way out of the recession? New craft entrepreneurs and the global economic downturn. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy & Society, 6(1), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rss022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M., & Delerue, H. (2012). Social media: Back to the roots and back to the future. Journal of Systems & Information Technology, 14(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287261211232126
   Google Scholar
• Kouhia, A. (2016). Unraveling the meaning of textile hobby craft. University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kouhia, A. (2020). On-line matters: Future vision of digital making and materiality in hobby crafting. Craft Research, 11(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00028_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouhia, A. (2021). From essential skill to productive capital: Perspectives on policies and practices of craft education in Finland. In D. Wood (Ed.), Craft is political (pp. 212–224). Bloomsbury visual arts.
   Google Scholar
• Luckman, S. (2015). Women’s micro-entrepreneurial homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(84), 146–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2015.1038117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckman, S., & Andrew, J. (2020). Creative craft and design microenterprise in the age of social media. In S. Luckman & J. Andrew (Eds.), Craftspeople and designer makers in the contemporary creative economy (pp. 207–238). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44979-7_8
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, A. (2016). Feeling lonely, feeling connected: Amateur knit and crochet makers online. Craft Research, 7(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.7.1.11_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayne, A. (2020). Make/Share: Textile making alone together in private and social media spaces. Journal of Arts and Communities, 10(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00008_1
   Google Scholar
• McFedries, P. (2007). Technically speaking: The hobbyist renaissance. IEEE Spectrum, 44(6), 88. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2007.369278
   Google Scholar
• Nastasi, B., Hitchcock, J., & Brown, L. (2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: Moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193
   Google Scholar
• Nimrod, G., & Adoni, H. (2012). Conceptualizing E-leisure. Loisir et Société/Society & Leisure, 35(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/07053436.2012.10707834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, C. (2023). ‘It’s just nice not to be on screens’: Exploring the relationship between pottery making, eudemonic wellbeing, and instagram. Leisure Studies, 43(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2023.2218600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton-Johnson, K. (2014). Knit, purl and upload: New technologies, digital mediations and the experience of leisure. Leisure Studies, 33(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2012.723730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pera, R., Quinton, S., & Baima, G. (2020). I am who I am: Sharing photos on social media by older consumers and its influence on subjective well‐being. Psychology & Marketing, 37(6), 782–795. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöllänen, S. (2015). Elements of crafts that enhance well-being. Journal of Leisure Research, 47(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2015.11950351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöllänen, S., & Voutilainen, L. (2017). Crafting well-being: Meanings and intentions of stay-at-home mothers’ craft-based leisure activity. Leisure Sciences, 40(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2017.1325801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risatti, H. (2007). Theory of craft: Function and aesthetic expression. University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., & Willson, V. (2017). Basic and advanced statistical tests : Writing results sections and creating tables and figures. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, G., & Bernard, H. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769–802). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, B. (2015). The work behind the scenes: The new intermediaries of the indie crafts business. Regional Studies, 49(3), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.770597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Castellan, J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, B., & Porko-Hudd, M. (2019). Life tangled in yarns –leisure knitting for well-being. Techne Series A, 26(2), 49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2021, October 10). More time spent in front of screens in 2021 than ever before. https://stat.fi/en/publication/cl8ipicxx123r0bw2oxe42g8i
   Google Scholar
• Stehlik-Barry, K., & Babinec, A. (2017). Data analysis with IBM SPSS statistics : Implementing data modeling, descriptive statistics and ANOVA. Packt.
   Google Scholar
• SVT - Suomen virallinen tilasto. (2018). Vapaa-ajan osallistuminen [Free time participation]. Tilastokeskus. https://www.stat.fi/til/vpa/
   Google Scholar
• Torrey, C., Churchill, E., & McDonald, D. (2009). Learning how: The search for craft knowledge on the internet. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1371–1380. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518908
   Google Scholar
• Väänänen, N., & Vilhunen, K. (2024). Exploratory factor analysis of sustainable craft theory among Finnish craft hobbyists. Craft Research, 15(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00117_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilhunen, K. (2018). Neuleblogi osana käsitöitä: neulebloggaajien kokemuksia blogin ja käsitöiden yhdistämisestä [Knitting Blog as Part of Craft]. Itä-Suomen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Vilhunen, K., Pöllänen, S., & Pitkäniemi, H. (2021). Reasons for knitting blogging and its importance for crafting. Techne Series, 28(3), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.7577/TechneA.4185
   Google Scholar
• Weber, R. (1990). Basic content analysis. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. (2006). Analysis of variance and functional measurement : A practical guide. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, J., & Hannam, K. (2015). Creativity, self expression and leisure. Leisure Studies, 34(3), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2014.923494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yair, K. (2012). How makers and craft organisations are using social media effectively. Crafts Council. https://www.craftscouncil.org.uk/documents/874/How_makers_and_craft_organisations_are_using_social_media_2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yarrow, T., & Jones, S. (2014). ‘Stone is stone’: Engagement and detachment in the craft of conservation masonry. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 20(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar