Influence of National Qualifications Frameworks in Conceptualising Feedback to Students

References

• Allais, S. M. (2007). Why the South African NQF failed: Lessons for countries wanting to introduce national qualifications frameworks. European Journal of Education, 42, 523–547. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00326.x.
   Google Scholar
• Allais, S. M. (2011). The impact and implementation of national qualifications frameworks: A comparison of 16 countries. Journal of Education and Work, 24, 233–258. 10.1080/13639080.2011.584685.
   Google Scholar
• Birtwistle, T. (2009). Towards 2010 (and then beyond) - the context of the Bologna Process, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1, 55–63. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/09695940802704088.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy Practice, 5, 7–74. 10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmur, D. (2004). A critique of the concept of a national qualifications framework. Quality in Higher Education, 10, 267–284. 10.1080/1353832042000299559.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151–167. 10.1080/713695728.
   Google Scholar
• Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual bases and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 57–66. 10.1080/14703290601081332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, J. (2011). Evaluating social work education: A review of outcomes, measures, research designs and practicalities. Social Work Education, 30, 122–140. 10.1080/02615479.2011.540375.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, M., & Gordon, J. (nd). Benchmarking the standards in social work education against the Scottish credit and qualifications framework: Six case studies. Scotland: Scottish Social Services Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cort, P. (2010). Stating the obvious: The European qualifications framework is not a neutral evidence-based policy tool. European Educational Research Journal, 9, 304–316. 10.2304/eerj.2010.9.3.304.
   Google Scholar
• Heron. (2011). Examining principles of formative and summative feedback. British Journal of Social Work, 41, 276–295. 10.1093/bjsw/bcq049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanic, R., Clark, R., & Rimmershaw, R. (2000). What am I supposed to make of this? The messages conveyed to students by tutors’ written comments. In M. R.Lea & B.Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education, New Contexts. Buckingham: SHRE/Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karseth, B., & Solbrekke, T. D. (2010). Qualifications frameworks: The avenue towards the convergence of European higher education?European Journal of Education, 45, 563–576. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2010.01449.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, V., & Keevy, J. (2010). Is the national qualifications framework a broken promise? A dialogue. Journal of Educational Change, 11, 193–203. 10.1007/s10833-010-9131-0.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G. (2011). Historical and documentary research in education. In L.Cohen, L.Manion, & K.Morrison (Eds.), Research methods in education (pp. 248–254). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, R., & Duncan, D. (2008). New degree, New Standards? A project investigating the alignment of the Standards in Social Work Education (SiSWE) to the Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework (SCQF). Dundee: Institute for Research and Innovation in Social Services.
   Google Scholar
• O'Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2008). Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 205–217. 10.1080/13562510801923344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raffe, D., Howieson, C., & Tinklin, T. (2007). The impact of a unified curriculum and qualifications system: The higher still reform of post-16 education in Scotland. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 479–508. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauhvargers, A. (2009). Recognition and qualifications frameworks. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 16, 111–125. 10.1080/09695940802704161.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144. 10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework. (2009). SCQF handbook: User guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Credit and Qualifications Framework Partnership.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish credit and qualifications framework. (2011). Review of the SCQF Level Descriptors. Retrieved from www.scqf.org.uk/News/&action = fullnews&id = 17.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. (2008). Beyond social constructivist perspectives on assessment: The centring of knowledge. Teaching in Higher Education, 13, 595–605. 10.1080/13562510802334970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2008). Trafficking in facts: Writing practices in social work. Qualitative Social Work, 7, 25–42. 10.1177/1473325007086414.
   Google Scholar
• Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogical practice. Higher Education, 45, 477–501. org/10.1023/A:1023967026413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. F. D. (2003). National qualifications frameworks as a global phenomenon: A comparative perspective. Journal of Education and Work, 16, 223–237. 10.1080/1363908032000099412.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. (2007). Qualifications frameworks: Some conceptual issues. European Journal of Education, 42, 445–457. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00323.x.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M., & Gordon, J. (2007). Editorial. European Journal of Education, 42, 439–444. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00324.x.
   Google Scholar