Publication Cover
Social Work Education
The International Journal
Volume 33, 2014 - Issue 7
505
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Graduate Social Work Students’ Approaches and Ways of Thinking in Child Protection Assessment: Case Vignette Reflections from Estonia

REFERENCES

  • Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research. Social Research Update, 25, 1–4.
  • Berg, I. K., & Kelly, S. (2000). Building solutions in child protective services. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
  • Bisman, C. D. (1999). Social work assessment: Case theory construction. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80, 240–246.
  • Blundo, R. (2006). Shifting our habits of mind: Learning to practice from a strengths perspective. In D.Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 25–45). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Butler, I., & Roberts, G. (2004). Social work with children and families: Getting into practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Press.
  • Cadell, S., Fletcher, M., Makkappallil-Knowles, E., Caldwell, S., Wong, L., Bodurtha, D., & … Shoblom, W. (2005). The use of the arts and the strengths perspective: The example of a course assignment. Social Work Education, 24, 137–146.
  • Caro, F. G., Yee, C., Levien, S., Gottlieb, A. S., Winter, J., McFadden, D. L., & Ho, T. H. (2012). Choosing among residential options: Results of a vignette experiment. Research on Aging, 34, 3–33.
  • Cash, S. J., & Berry, M. (2002). Family characteristics and child welfare services: Does the assessment drive service provision?Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 83, 499–507.
  • Casstevens, W. J. (2010). Social work education on mental health: Postmodern discourse and the medical model. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 30, 385–398.
  • Cederbaum, J., & Klusaritz, H. A. (2009). Clinical instruction: Using the strengths-based approach with nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 48, 423–424.
  • Cohen, B. Z. (1999). Intervention and supervision in strengths-based social work practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 80, 460–466.
  • Cowger, C. D. (1994). Assessing client strengths: Clinical assessment for client empowerment. Social Work, 39, 262–268.
  • Darlington, Y., Healy, K., & Feeney, J. A. (2010). Approaches to assessment and intervention across four types of child and family welfare services. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 356–364.
  • Dybicz, P. (2012). The hero(ine) on a journey: A postmodern conceptual framework for social work practice. Journal of Social Work Education, 48, 267–283.
  • Early, T. J., & GlenMaye, L. F. (2000). Valuing families: Social work practice with families from a strengths perspective. Social Work, 45, 118–130.
  • Ellis, R. A., Dulmus, C. N., & Wodarski, J. S. (2003). Essentials of child welfare. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Everson, M. D., & Sandoval, J. M. (2011). Forensic child sexual abuse evaluations: Assessing subjectivity and bias in professional judgements. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35, 287–298.
  • Forrester, D., Westlake, D., & Glynn, G. (2012). Parental resistance and social worker skills: Towards a theory of motivational social work. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 118–129.
  • Gardner, M., & Toope, D. (2011). A social justice perspective on strengths-based approaches: Exploring educators' perspectives and practices. Canadian Journal of Education, 34, 86–102.
  • Germain, C. B., & Gitterman, A. (1980). The life model of social work practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Gray, J. I., & Kabadaki, K. (2005). A strengths perspective for assessing older adults: Curriculum enrichment in a human behavior course. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, Special Issue on Gerontology. Retrieved from http://www.learningace.com/doc/775480/6d9f6910faa1e054e7e3e3c40dc4be32/gray-kabadaki-2005-a-strengths-perspecitve-for-assessing-older-adults-curriculum-enrichment-in-a-human-behavior-course.
  • Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 82, 233–242.
  • Hayes, D., & Spratt, T. (2012). Child welfare as child protection then and now: What social workers did and continue to do. British Journal of Social Work, 1–21. 10.1093/bjsw/bcs161.
  • Hetherington, R. (1998). Issues in European child protection research. European Journal of Social Work, 1, 71–82.
  • Hewitt, M. B. (2005). The importance of taking a strength-based perspective. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 14, 23–36.
  • Hughes, R. (1998). Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 381–400.
  • Hughes, R., & Huby, M. (2002). The application of vignettes in social and nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37, 382–386.
  • Jenkins, N., Bloor, M., Fischer, J., Berney, L., & Neale, J. (2010). Putting it in context: The use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10, 175–198.
  • Jent, J. F., Eaton, C. K., Knickerbocker, L., Lambert, W. F., Merrick, M. T., & Dandes, S. K. (2011). Multidisciplinary child protection decision making about physical abuse: Determining substantiation thresholds and biases. Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 1673–1682.
  • Karoll, B. R. (2010). Applying social work approaches, harm reduction, and practice wisdom to better serve those with alcohol and drug use disorders. Journal of Social Work, 10, 263–281.
  • Kessler, M. L., Gira, E., & Poertner, J. (2005). Moving best practice to evidence-based practice in child welfare. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 86, 244–250.
  • Kisthardt, W. E. (2006). The opportunities and challenges of strengths-based, person-centered practice. Purpose, principles, and applications in a climate of system's integration. In D.Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 171–196). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Lai, K. (2009). The contextual demands of children and families in contemporary Estonia: Toward policy reformation. In P.Isley, J.Karing, & M.Kerulis (Eds.), Research, planning and policy: Emerging trends in Baltic and Nordic lifelong learning (pp. 41–52). Tampere: Juvenes Print.
  • LeBlanc, V. R., Regehr, C., Shlonsky, A., & Bogo, M. (2012). Stress responses and decision making in child protection workers faced with high conflict situations. Child Abuse & Neglect, 36, 404–412. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.01.003.
  • Léveillé, S., & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a general model for child welfare and protection services: A meta-evaluation of international experiences regarding the adoption of the framework for the assessment of children in need and their families (FACNF). Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 929–944.
  • Lietz, C. A. (2011). Theoretical adherence to family centered practice: Are strengths-based principles illustrated in families' descriptions of child welfare services?Children and Youth Services Review, 33, 888–893.
  • Manthey, T. J., Knowles, B., Asher, D., & Wahab, S. (2011). Strengths-based practice and motivational interviewing. Advances in Social Work, 12, 126–151.
  • McDonald, G. W. (1979). Family well-being and quality of life: Humanistic concerns of the family impact analyst. The Family Coordinator, 28, 313–320.
  • McMillen, J. C., Morris, L., & Sherraden, M. (2004). Ending social work's grudge match: Problems versus strengths. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85, 317–325.
  • McQualde, S., & Ehrenreich, J. H. (1997). Assessing client strengths. Families in Society. March/April 201-212. Retrieved from http://preventchildabusenj.org/documents/fop_admin/9407122511.pdf.
  • Milner, J., & O'Byrne, P. (2009). Assessment in social work. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Min, T. (2011). The client-centered integrative strengths-based approach: Ending longstanding conflict between social work values and practice. Canadian Social Science, 7, 15–22.
  • Morris, K., & Connolly, M. (2012). Family decision making in child welfare: Challenges in developing a knowledge base for practice. Child Abuse Review, 21, 41–52.
  • Murphy, D., Duggan, M., & Joseph, S. (2012). Relationship-based social work and its compatibility with the person-centred approach: Principled versus instrumental perspectives. British Journal of Social Work, 43, 703–719. 10.1093/bjsw/bcs003.
  • Noble, D. N., Perkins, K., & Fatout, M. (2000). On being a strength coach: Child welfare and the strengths model. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17, 141–153.
  • Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
  • Paquin, G. (2006). Including narrative concepts in social work practice classes. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 26, 127–145.
  • Parton, N., & O'Byrne, P. (2000). Constructive social work: Towards a new practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Patterson, G. R. (1983). Stress: A change agent for family process. In N.Garmezy & M.Rutter (Eds.), Stress, coping, and development in children (pp. 235–264). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  • Platt, D. (2006). Threshold decisions: How social workers prioritize referrals of child concern. Child Abuse Review, 15, 4–18.
  • Platt, D. (2012). Understanding parental engagement with child welfare services: An integrated model. Child and Family Social Work, 17(2), 138–148, 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00828.x.
  • Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2008). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Thomson, Brooks/Cole.
  • Saleebey, D. (2006a). Introduction: Power in the people. In D.Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 1–24). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Saleebey, D. (2006b). The strengths perspective: Possibilities and problems. In D.Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 279–303). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Saleebey, D. (2006c). The strengths approach to practice. In D.Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 77–92). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • Saleebey, D. (2008). Commentary on the strengths perspective and potential applications in school counseling. Professional School Counseling, 12, 68–75.
  • Scerra, N. (2011). Strengths-based practice: The evidence. A discussion paper. UnitingCare. Retrieved from http://www.childrenyoungpeopleandfamilies.org.au/info/social_justice/submissions/research_papers_and_briefs//?a = 6240.
  • Sousa, L., Ribeiro, C., & Rodrigues, S. (2006). Intervention with multi-problem poor clients: Towards a strengths-focused perspective. Journal of Social Work Practice, 20, 189–204.
  • Statistics Estonia. (2013). Children without parental care in need of assistance. Retrieved from http://pub.stat.ee/px-web.2001/Database/Sotsiaalelu/databasetree.asp.
  • The Republic of Estonia Child Protection Act. (1992). RT I, 21.03.2011, 50.
  • Toros, K. (2011). Assessment of child well-being: Child protection practice in Estonia. Tallinn: Tallinn University.
  • Toros, K. (2012). Child protection assessment practices in Estonia. Social Policy and Social Work in Transition, 3, 25–49.
  • Toros, K., Tiko, A., & Saia, K. (2013). Child-centered approach in the context of the assessment of children in need: Reflections of child protection workers' in Estonia. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1015–1022.
  • Trevithick, P. (2005). Social work skills: A practice handbook. New York, NY: Open University Press.
  • Tulva, T. (1998). Estonian welfare in transition. In B.Munday & G.Lane (Eds.), The old and the new: Changes in social care in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 113–127). Canterbury: University of Kent.
  • Turney, D. (2012). A relationship-based approach to engaging involuntary clients: The contribution of recognition theory. Child and Family Social Work, 17, 149–159.
  • Turney, D., Platt, D., Selwyn, J., & Farmer, E. (2011). Social work assessment of children in need: What do we know? Messages from research. Retrieved from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DFE-RBX-10-08.pdf.
  • Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases—why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child Abuse Review, 21, 7–23.
  • Walsh, T. C. (2002). Structured process recording: A comprehensive model that incorporates the strengths perspective. Social Work Education, 21, 23–34.
  • Weick, A., Rapp, C., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, W. (1989). A strengths perspective for social work practice. Social Work, 34, 350–354.
  • Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative Social Work, 3, 78–87.
  • Yip, K. S. (2003). A strengths perspective in working with an adolescent with dual diagnosis. Clinical Social Work Journal, 31, 189–203.
  • Yip, K. S. (2006). A strengths perspective in working with an adolescent with self-cutting behaviors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 23, 134–146.
  • Zimmermann Wilson, S. (2006). Field education: Linking self-efficacy theory and the strengths perspective. The Journal of Baccalaureate Social Work, 12, 261–274.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.